U. S. For Use of Duo Metal & Iron Works, Inc. v. S. T. C. Const. Co., Inc, 688 F.2d 827 (3rd Cir. 1982). · Go Syfert
U. S. For Use of Duo Metal & Iron Works, Inc. v. S. T. C. Const. Co., Inc, 688 F.2d 827 (3rd Cir. 1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
106 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 42 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jackson v. State (del, 1994-07-15) · Strongest negative: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Hinkson (ca3, 1988-06-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Hinkson
3rd Cir. · 1988 · signal: but cf. · confidence high
But cf. United States v. Kurtz, 525 F.Supp. 734 (E.D.Pa.1981) (Becker, J.), aff'd without opinion, 688 F.2d 827 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 991 , 103 S.Ct. 347 , 74 L.Ed.2d 387 (1982); FDIC v. Barrera, 595 F.Supp. 894 (D.P.R.1984). 16 Section 2415(a) means what it says--a contract suit by the government must be filed within six years of accrual.
discussed Cited "but see" Federal Deposit Insurance v. Hinkson
3rd Cir. · 1988 · signal: but cf. · confidence high
But cf. United States v. Kurtz, 525 F.Supp. 734 (E.D.Pa.1981) (Becker, J.), aff'd without opinion, 688 F.2d 827 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 991 , 103 S.Ct. 347 , 74 L.Ed.2d 387 (1982); FDIC v. Barrera, 595 F.Supp. 894 (D.P.R.1984).
cited Cited "see" Jackson v. State
Del. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sickles, D.Del., 524 F.Supp. 506, 511 (1981), aff'd, 3d Cir., 688 F.2d 827 (1982).
cited Cited "see" United States Ex Rel. Small Business Administration v. LaFrance
D. Del. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Kurtz, 525 F.Supp. 734, 740 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd, 688 F.2d 827 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 991 , 103 S.Ct. 347 , 74 L.Ed.2d 387 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Copper
N.D. Iowa · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Kurtz, 525 F.Supp. 734, 740 (E.D.Pa.1981), aff'd, 688 F.2d 827 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 991 , 103 S.Ct. 347 , 74 L.Ed.2d 387 (1982) (an action to enforce a guarantee on a defaulted SBA loan is an action for money damages governed by 28 U.S.C. § 2415 (a)).
discussed Cited "see" Harold Nadler v. Baybank Merrimack Valley, N.A. (2×)
1st Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Kurtz, E.D.Pa., 1981, 525 F.Supp. 734, 748 , aff'd, 688 F.2d 827 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 991 , 103 S.Ct. 347 , 74 L.Ed.2d 387 ; Credit Alliance Corp. v. Cornelius & Rush Coal Co., N.D.Ala., 1980, 508 F.Supp. 63, 68 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bank of Nova Scotia v. Pemberton
D.V.I. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
A court can, in its discretion, "fashion some other arrangement for substitute security . . . which would furnish equal protection to the judgment creditor." Poplar Grove Planting & Refining Co. v. Bache Halsey Stuart, Inc., 600 F.2d 1189, 1191 (5th Cir.1979) (emphasis added); see also, U.S. v. Kurtz, 528 F. Supp. 1113, 1114 (E.D.Pa. 1981), aff'd, 688 F.2d 827 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 991 , 74 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Endress + Hauser, Inc. v. Hawk Measurement Systems Pty. Ltd.
S.D. Ind. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
We can, in our discretion, “fashion some other arrangement for substitute security ... which would furnish equal protection to the judgment creditor.” Poplar Grove Planting & Refining Co. v. Bache Halsey Stuart, Inc., 600 F.2d 1189, 1191 (5th Cir.1979) (emphasis added); see also, U.S. v. Kurtz, 528 F.Supp. 1113, 1114 (E.D.Penn.1981), aff’d, 688 F.2d 827 (3rd Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 991 , 103 S.Ct. 347 , 74 L.Ed.2d 387 (1982) (Rule 62(d) “plainly dictates that in the ordinary case execution on a judgment for money should not be stayed unless the party that prevailed in the dis…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Fr. Winkler Kg v. Gene Stoller v. Helmut Winkler, Martha Winkler Fuhst, Kurt Maier, Walter Schnee, and Franz Remensberger. Appeal of Gene Stoller
3rd Cir. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Kurtz, 525 F.Supp. 734, 742 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd, 688 F.2d 827 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 991 , 103 S.Ct. 347 , 74 L.Ed.2d 387 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
U. S. For Use of Duo Metal and Iron Works, Inc.
v.
S. T. C. Const. Co., Inc
81-2968.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Jun 30, 1982.
688 F.2d 827
Published

688 F.2d 827

U. S. For Use of Duo Metal and Iron Works, Inc.
v.
S. T. C. Const. Co., Inc.

81-2968, 81-2969

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit

6/30/82

1

E.D.Pa.

APPEAL DISMISSED