green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Hinkson
But cf. United States v. Kurtz, 525 F.Supp. 734 (E.D.Pa.1981) (Becker, J.), aff'd without opinion, 688 F.2d 827 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 991 , 103 S.Ct. 347 , 74 L.Ed.2d 387 (1982); FDIC v. Barrera, 595 F.Supp. 894 (D.P.R.1984). 16 Section 2415(a) means what it says--a contract suit by the government must be filed within six years of accrual.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Hinkson
But cf. United States v. Kurtz, 525 F.Supp. 734 (E.D.Pa.1981) (Becker, J.), aff'd without opinion, 688 F.2d 827 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 991 , 103 S.Ct. 347 , 74 L.Ed.2d 387 (1982); FDIC v. Barrera, 595 F.Supp. 894 (D.P.R.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Jackson v. State
See United States v. Sickles, D.Del., 524 F.Supp. 506, 511 (1981), aff'd, 3d Cir., 688 F.2d 827 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Small Business Administration v. LaFrance
See United States v. Kurtz, 525 F.Supp. 734, 740 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd, 688 F.2d 827 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 991 , 103 S.Ct. 347 , 74 L.Ed.2d 387 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Copper
See United States v. Kurtz, 525 F.Supp. 734, 740 (E.D.Pa.1981), aff'd, 688 F.2d 827 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 991 , 103 S.Ct. 347 , 74 L.Ed.2d 387 (1982) (an action to enforce a guarantee on a defaulted SBA loan is an action for money damages governed by 28 U.S.C. § 2415 (a)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harold Nadler v. Baybank Merrimack Valley, N.A.
(2×)
See United States v. Kurtz, E.D.Pa., 1981, 525 F.Supp. 734, 748 , aff'd, 688 F.2d 827 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 991 , 103 S.Ct. 347 , 74 L.Ed.2d 387 ; Credit Alliance Corp. v. Cornelius & Rush Coal Co., N.D.Ala., 1980, 508 F.Supp. 63, 68 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bank of Nova Scotia v. Pemberton
A court can, in its discretion, "fashion some other arrangement for substitute security . . . which would furnish equal protection to the judgment creditor." Poplar Grove Planting & Refining Co. v. Bache Halsey Stuart, Inc., 600 F.2d 1189, 1191 (5th Cir.1979) (emphasis added); see also, U.S. v. Kurtz, 528 F. Supp. 1113, 1114 (E.D.Pa. 1981), aff'd, 688 F.2d 827 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 991 , 74 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Endress + Hauser, Inc. v. Hawk Measurement Systems Pty. Ltd.
We can, in our discretion, “fashion some other arrangement for substitute security ... which would furnish equal protection to the judgment creditor.” Poplar Grove Planting & Refining Co. v. Bache Halsey Stuart, Inc., 600 F.2d 1189, 1191 (5th Cir.1979) (emphasis added); see also, U.S. v. Kurtz, 528 F.Supp. 1113, 1114 (E.D.Penn.1981), aff’d, 688 F.2d 827 (3rd Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 991 , 103 S.Ct. 347 , 74 L.Ed.2d 387 (1982) (Rule 62(d) “plainly dictates that in the ordinary case execution on a judgment for money should not be stayed unless the party that prevailed in the dis…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fr. Winkler Kg v. Gene Stoller v. Helmut Winkler, Martha Winkler Fuhst, Kurt Maier, Walter Schnee, and Franz Remensberger. Appeal of Gene Stoller
See also United States v. Kurtz, 525 F.Supp. 734, 742 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd, 688 F.2d 827 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 991 , 103 S.Ct. 347 , 74 L.Ed.2d 387 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
U. S. For Use of Duo Metal and Iron Works, Inc.
v.
S. T. C. Const. Co., Inc
v.
S. T. C. Const. Co., Inc
81-2968.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Jun 30, 1982.
688 F.2d 827
Published
U. S. For Use of Duo Metal and Iron Works, Inc.
v.
S. T. C. Const. Co., Inc.
81-2968, 81-2969
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit
6/30/82
1
E.D.Pa.
APPEAL DISMISSED