green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
O'CONNELL v. Gorski
See Finkelstein v. Barthelemy, supra, at 1260 fn. 37 (noting a number of cases where Courts have upheld the political firings of government attorneys); but see Tavano v. County of Niagara, New York, 621 F.Supp. 345 (W.D.N.Y.1985), aff'd 800 F.2d 1128 (2d Cir.1986) (unpublished opinion) (finding that an Assistant County Attorney, whose sole duties were assisting persons in Family Court, was not a policymaker, but nonetheless upholding the dismissal for legitimate apolitical reasons).
discussed
Cited "see"
Booze v. Shawmut Bank, Connecticut
See Toliver v. Community Action Commission, 613 F.Supp. 1070, 1074 (S.D.N.Y.1985), aff'd, 800 F.2d 1128 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 863 , 107 S.Ct. 217 , 93 L.Ed.2d 146 (noting that because some of the decision makers were members of the same protected class as plaintiff, inference of discrimination becomes attenuated).
cited
Cited "see"
Pfizer, Inc. v. Perrigo Co.
See Metro Kane Imports, Ltd. v. Federated Dep't Stores Inc., 625 F.Supp. 313, 318 (S.D.N.Y.1985), aff'd without op., 800 F.2d 1128 (2d Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Marlow v. Office of Court Administration of New York
See Toliver v. Community Action, 613 F.Supp. 1070, 1074 (S.D.N.Y.1985), aff'd, 800 F.2d 1128 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 863 , 107 S.Ct. 217 , 93 L.Ed.2d 146 (1986) (if decisionmaker is in same protected class as plaintiff, claims of discrimination become less plausible).
cited
Cited "see"
McKinney v. State of Ill.
See Park South Associates v. Fischbein, 626 *709 F.Supp. 1108, 1113 (S.D.N.Y.) (rejecting application of section 1512 to state court or state agency proceedings), aff'd, 800 F.2d 1128 (2d Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brandir International, Inc. v. Cascade Pacific Lumber Co.
See Metro Kane Imports, Ltd. v. Rowoco, Inc., 618 F.Supp. 273, 275-76 (S.D.N.Y.1985), aff'd mem., 800 F.2d 1128 (2d Cir.1986) (finding high-tech design of orange juice squeezer not dictated by function to be performed as there was no evidence that design permitted juicer to be manufactured at lower price or with altered performance).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brandir International, Inc. v. Cascade Pacific Lumber Co.
See Metro Kane Imports, Ltd. v. Rowoco, Inc., 618 F.Supp. 273, 275-76 (S.D.N.Y.1985), aff'd mem., 800 F.2d 1128 (2d Cir.1986) (finding high-tech design of orange juice squeezer not dictated by function to be performed as there was no evidence that design permitted juicer to be manufactured at lower price or with altered performance).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Curtis & Associates, P.C. v. Law Offices of Bushman
See, e.g., Daddona, 156 F.Supp.2d at 162 (“Attempts to characterize abuse of process or malicious prosecution claims as mail and wire fraud violations for RICO purposes have been scrutinized by the courts, and have been rejected where the only allegedly fraudulent conduct relates to the filing of documents in litigation.”); see also Park South Assocs. v. Fischbein, 626 F.Supp. 1108, 1114 (S.D.N.Y.1986), aff'd, 800 F.2d 1128 (2d Cir.1986) (rejecting plaintiffs’ RICO claims on various grounds including that plaintiff “has not pled” a RICO predicate act although “[plaintiffs’ allega…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Drummond v. IPC International, Inc.
See, e.g., Toliver v. Community Action Comm’n to Help the Economy, Inc., CACHE, 613 F.Supp. 1070, 1074 (S.D.N.Y.1985) (stating that if decision maker is in same protected class as plaintiff, claims of discrimination become less plausible), aff'd, 800 F.2d 1128 (2d Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
PaF Srl v. Lisa Lighting Co., Ltd.
See, e.g., Metro Kane Imports, Ltd. v. Rowoco, Inc., 595 F.Supp. 702, 707 (S.D.N.Y.1984) (Metro I) (citing Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co., 376 U.S. 225, 231 , 84 S.Ct. 784, 789 , 11 L.Ed.2d 661 (1964)), aff'd mem., 800 F.2d 1128 (2d Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jolly Good Industries, Inc. v. Elegra Inc.
See, e.g., Metro Kane, 625 F.Supp. 313, 316-17 (S.D.N.Y.1985), aff'd sub nom., 800 F.2d 1128 (2d Cir.1986); National Lampoon, Inc. v. American Broadcasting Cos., Inc., 376 F.Supp. 733, 747 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 497 F.2d 1343, 1343 (2d Cir.1974) (“[T]he judge justifiably found that the defendant ... had deliberately attempted to exploit [plaintiff’s] well-known name and reputation.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Levine v. Arabian American Oil Co.
See, e.g., Levine, supra, at 1; Reply Memorandum at 23 (Aramco did not even move for summary judgment on the Levine claims when it did so with respect to the remaining plaintiffs because of the "complex factual situation”); cf. Sun Refining & Marketing Co. v. D'Arpino, 112 F.R.D. 668 (S.D.N.Y.1986) (Carter, J.) (sanctions warranted for obviously frivolous removal petition in a simple case).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Simina
v.
MacY
v.
MacY
86-7087.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Apr 17, 1986.
Published
Simina
v.
Macy's
86-7087
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
4/17/86
1
S.D.N.Y.
AFFIRMED