John West v. Patricia Schupple, Assistant Warden Larry Allen, 861 F.2d 267 (4th Cir. 1988). · Go Syfert
Search
John West v. Patricia Schupple, Assistant Warden Larry Allen, 861 F.2d 267 (4th Cir. 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Keene v. Thompson (ncmd, 2002-08-26)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Keene v. Thompson (2×)
M.D.N.C. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., Ellis v. United States Postal Service, 784 F.2d 835 , 838 (7th Cir.1986); see also Williams v. Bolger, 861 F.2d 267 , No. 88-1534, 1988 WL 105284 (4th Cir. Sept.26, 1988) (unpublished opinion) (citing Ellis and stating that the district court “correctly held that the only proper defendant on [the] Title VII and ADEA claims was the Postmaster General”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
John West
v.
Patricia Schupple, Assistant Warden Larry Allen
87-7716.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Oct 7, 1988.
861 F.2d 267
Unpublished

861 F.2d 267
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
John WEST, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Patricia SCHUPPLE, Assistant Warden; Larry Allen,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-7716.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 16, 1988.
Decided: Oct. 7, 1988.

John West, appellant pro se.

Karen Stakem Hornig, Mark Disbrow McCurdy (Office of the Attorney General of Maryland), for appellees.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

John West appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. West v. Schupple, C/A No. 85-928-HM (D.Md. Sept. 2, 1987). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.