Restoney Robinson v. James B. McMillan Clarence W. Burr, H.B. Griggs, Sgt., Aaron Johnson, S.E. Callahal, Sgt., 911 F.2d 724 (4th Cir. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
Restoney Robinson v. James B. McMillan Clarence W. Burr, H.B. Griggs, Sgt., Aaron Johnson, S.E. Callahal, Sgt., 911 F.2d 724 (4th Cir. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the district court has discretionary authority to deny a motion for summary judgment in response to the nonmoving party's plea for additional discovery”
43 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Breece v. NaturChem Inc (scd, 2022-05-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Breece v. NaturChem Inc
D.S.C. · 2022 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the district court has discretionary authority to deny a motion for summary judgment in response to the nonmoving party's plea for additional discovery
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Restoney Robinson
v.
James B. McMillan Clarence W. Burr, H.B. Griggs, Sgt., Aaron Johnson, S.E. Callahal, Sgt.
90-6338.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jul 20, 1990.
911 F.2d 724
Unpublished
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 68%
Citer courts: D. South Carolina (1)

911 F.2d 724
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Restoney ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James B. McMILLAN, Clarence W. Burr, H.B. Griggs, Sgt.,
Aaron Johnson, S.E. Callahal, Sgt., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-6338.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 9, 1990.
Decided July 20, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Chief District Judge. (C/A No. 89-350-P)

Restoney Robinson, appellant pro se.

W.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Restoney Robinson noted this appeal outside the 30-day appeal period established by Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1), and failed to move for an extension of the appeal period within the additional 30-day period provided by Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(5). The time periods established by Fed.R.App.P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.