John A. Ewen & Howard C., Welborn, Jr., Junior Party v. Walter Kaminsky Heinrich Hahnsen, Klaus Kulper & Rudiger Woldt, Senior Party, 914 F.2d 271 (Fed. Cir. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
John A. Ewen & Howard C., Welborn, Jr., Junior Party v. Walter Kaminsky Heinrich Hahnsen, Klaus Kulper & Rudiger Woldt, Senior Party, 914 F.2d 271 (Fed. Cir. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
107 citation events (55 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Myers Investigative & Security Services, Inc. v. United States (uscfc, 2000-09-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Myers Investigative & Security Services, Inc. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
Electro-Methods, Inc. v. United States, 7 Cl.Ct. 755, 762 (1985); see RADVA Corp. v. United States, 17 Cl.Ct. 812, 818 (1989), aff'd without op., 914 F.2d 271 (Fed.Cir.1990).
cited Cited "see" Antarctic Support Associates v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Synetics, 45 Fed.Cl. at 5 , RADVA Corp. v. United States, 17 Cl.Ct. 812, 818 (1989), aff'd without op., 914 F.2d 271 (Fed.Cir.1990).
cited Cited "see" ITT Federal Services Corp. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
Electro-Methods, Inc. v. United States, 7 Cl.Ct. 755, 762 (1985); see RADVA Corp. v. United States, 17 Cl.Ct. 812, 818 (1989), aff'd without op., 914 F.2d 271 (Fed.Cir.1990).
cited Cited "see" Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Electro-Methods, Inc. v. United States, 7 Cl.Ct. 755, 762 (1985); see RADVA Corp. v. United States, 17 Cl.Ct. 812, 818 (1989), aff'd without op., 914 F.2d 271 (Fed.Cir.1990).
cited Cited "see" Marine Hydraulics International, Inc. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
Electro-Methods, Inc. v. United States, 7 Cl.Ct. 755, 762 (1985); see RADVA Corp. v. United States, 17 Cl.Ct. 812, 818 (1989), aff'd without op., 914 F.2d 271 , 1990 WL 122139 (Fed.Cir.1990).
cited Cited "see" DGS Contract Service, Inc. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
Electro-Methods, Inc. v. United States, 7 Cl.Ct. 755, 762 (1985); see RADVA Corp. v. United States, 17 Cl.Ct. 812, 818 (1989), aff'd without op., 914 F.2d 271 (Fed.Cir.1990).
cited Cited "see" Cincom Systems, Inc. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
Electro-Methods, Inc. v. United States, 7 Cl.Ct. 755, 762 (1985); see RADVA Corp. v. United States, 17 Cl.Ct. 812, 818 (1989), aff'd without op., 914 F.2d 271 (Fed.
cited Cited "see" Compubahn, Inc. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See RADVA Corp. v. United States, 17 Cl.Ct. 812, 818 (1989), aff'd, 914 F.2d 271 (Fed.Cir.1990).
cited Cited "see" Professional Building Concepts, Inc. v. City of Central Falls
1st Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See RADVA Corp. v. United States, 17 Cl.Ct. 812 (1989) (quoting 48 C.F.R. § 28.101-4 ), aff'd, 914 F.2d 271 (Fed.Cir.1990).
discussed Cited "see" Professional Building Concepts, Inc. v. The City of Central Falls, Professional Building Concepts, Inc. v. The City of Central Falls, Promac, Inc., Plaintiff-Intervenor
1st Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See RADVA Corp. v. United States, 17 Cl.Ct. 812 (1989) (quoting 48 C.F.R. § 28.101-4 ), aff'd, 914 F.2d 271 (Fed.Cir.1990). 13 No controlling cases have been called to our attention, and we have not located any interpreting FAR or HUD regulations with respect to the significance of a bid guarantee.
cited Cited "see" Professional Building Concepts, Inc. v. City of Central Falls Housing Authority
D.R.I. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See RADVA Corporation v. United States, 17 Cl.Ct. 812 (1989), aff'd, 914 F.2d 271 (Fed.Cir.1990) (quoting 48 C.F.R. 28.101-4).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Teets v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
A certified copy of the taxpayer’s “Certificate of Assessments and Payments” is “routinely used to prove that a tax assessment has in fact been made." Rocovich v. United States, 933 F.2d 991, 994 (Fed.Cir. 1991); see also Dougherty v. United States, 18 Cl.Ct. 335, 350 (1989), aff'd without op., 914 F.2d 271 (Fed.Cir.1990); Pototzky v. United States, 8 Cl.Ct. 308, 315 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
John A. Ewen and Howard C., Welborn, Jr., Junior Party
v.
Walter Kaminsky Heinrich Hahnsen, Klaus Kulper and Rudiger Woldt, Senior Party
90-1168.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Aug 27, 1990.
914 F.2d 271
Unpublished

914 F.2d 271

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
John A. EWEN and Howard C., Welborn, Jr., Junior Party, Appellants,
v.
Walter Kaminsky Heinrich HAHNSEN, Klaus Kulper and Rudiger
Woldt, Senior Party, Appellees.

No. 90-1168.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 27, 1990.

PER CURIAM.

1

Before NIES, Chief Judge, MICHEL, Circuit Judge, and COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge):

2

AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.

Judgment