Walter L. Green v. Officer Holmes Sergeant Ellis, 972 F.2d 339 (4th Cir. 1992). · Go Syfert
Walter L. Green v. Officer Holmes Sergeant Ellis, 972 F.2d 339 (4th Cir. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
48 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hancock v. United States (vawd, 2023-12-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Hancock v. United States
W.D. Va. · 2023 · confidence medium
Harms v. United States, 972 F.2d 339 at *5 (4th Cir. 1992) (unpublished) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" Sierra Club v. National Marine Fisheries Service
D. Maryland · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harms v. United States, 972 F.2d 339 , 1992 WL 203942 , at *7—8 (4th Cir. Aug. 24, 1992) (unpublished table decision).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Duell v. Heidenrich
4th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See Egan v. Duell, 972 F.2d 339 (4th Cir.1992) (Table) (per curiam) (dismissing the appeal).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Walter L. Green
v.
Officer Holmes Sergeant Ellis
92-6467.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Aug 4, 1992.
972 F.2d 339
Unpublished

972 F.2d 339

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Walter L. GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Officer HOLMES; Sergeant Ellis, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-6467.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 20, 1992
Decided: August 4, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. B. Waugh Crigler, Magistrate Judge. (CA-91-535-R)

Walter L. Green, Appellant Pro Se.

William Rundahl Coleman, Office of The Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

Dismissed.

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Walter L. Green noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), and failed to move for an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5). The time periods established by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED