Ethridge (George) v. Kennedy (Mark), Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A., Genesis Inv. Grp., Inc, 983 F.2d 1050 (3rd Cir. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Ethridge (George) v. Kennedy (Mark), Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A., Genesis Inv. Grp., Inc, 983 F.2d 1050 (3rd Cir. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“a showing of malice ... requires more than mere conclusory allegations; it cannot be asserted without corroborating factual specificity.”
36 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Rachael Boseman v. Upper Providence Township (ca3, 2017-02-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Rachael Boseman v. Upper Providence Township
3rd Cir. · 2017 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
a showing of malice ... requires more than mere conclusory allegations; it cannot be asserted without corroborating factual specificity.
cited Cited "see" Coote v. Doe(s) 1 and 2
M.D. Penn. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. (quoting Montanez v. Thompson, 603 F.3d 243 , 252 (3d Cir. 2010)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ethridge (George)
v.
Kennedy (Mark), Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A., Genesis Investment Group, Inc
92-7261.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Dec 23, 1992.
983 F.2d 1050
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 76%
Citer courts: Third Circuit (1)

983 F.2d 1050

Ethridge (George)
v.
Kennedy (Mark), Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A., Genesis
Investment Group, Inc.

NO. 92-7261

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

Dec 23, 1992

1

Appeal From: D.V.I.

2

AFFIRMED.