In the Matter Of: Edward Richman Ilene H. Richman, Debtors. Edward Richman Ilene H. Richman v. Galland, Kharasch, Morse & Garfinkle, Pc, 103 F.3d 119 (4th Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
In the Matter Of: Edward Richman Ilene H. Richman, Debtors. Edward Richman Ilene H. Richman v. Galland, Kharasch, Morse & Garfinkle, Pc, 103 F.3d 119 (4th Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
45 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Powers v. American Express Financial Advisors, Inc. (mdd, 2000-01-24)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see, e.g." Powers v. American Express Financial Advisors, Inc.
D. Maryland · 2000 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Precon Corp. v. G & B Environmental, Inc., 103 F.3d 119 , 1996 WL 694440 (4th Cir.1996)(table) (citing Maryland authority).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sandow-Pajewski v. Busch Entertainment Corp.
E.D. Va. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Cannon v. Clarke, 209 Va. 708 , 167 S.E.2d 352, 355 (1969); see also Rodgers v. Food Lion, Inc., No. 95-2815, 1996 WL 673802, at *1 (4th Cir. Nov.22, 1996) (unpublished table opinion at 103 F.3d 119 ); Kellam v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 843 F.Supp. 1074, 1075 (E.D.Va.1994); Ashby v. Faison, 247 Va. 166 , 440 S.E.2d 603, 605 (1994); Grim v. Rahe, Inc., 246 Va. 239 , 434 S.E.2d 888, 889-90 (1993); Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Parker, 240 Va. 180 , 396 S.E.2d 649, 650 (1990).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Rock-Tenn Company v. United Paper Workers International Union, Afl-Cio
4th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
In such circumstances “there is no justification for drawing the inference that the arbitrator may have exceeded his authority.” Mobay, 755 F.2d at 1112 ; see also Owen-Williams v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 907 F.Supp. 134, 137 (D.Md.1995), aff'd, 103 F.3d 119 , 1996 WL 688219 (4th Cir.1996)(table); Nghiem v. NEC Electronic, Inc., 25 F.3d 1437, 1440 (9th Cir.1994); Jones Dairy Farm v. Local No. P-1236, United Food & Commercial Workers Int’l Union, 760 F.2d 173, 175-76 (7th Cir.1985); Piggly Wiggly Operators’ Warehouse, Inc. v. Piggly Wiggly Operators’ Warehouse Ind…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Norfolk Southern Ry. Co. v. Shulimson Bros. Co.
W.D.N.C. · 1998 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Norfolk Federation of Business Dist. v. H.U.D., 932 F.Supp. 730 , 736 (E.D.Va.1996) (‘‘[A] brief or memorandum submitted in support of a motion to dismiss is not considered to be outside of the pleadings_”), aff'd, 103 F.3d 119 (table), 1996 WL 671293 *1 (4th Cir.1996) ("In short, a court may consider matters of public record, items appearing in the record of the case, as well as exhibits attached to the complaint.”); accord, Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Schmoke, 63 F.3d 1305, 1312 (4th Cir.1995), vacated on other grounds, 517 U.S. 1206 , 116 S.Ct. 1821 , 134 L.Ed.2d 927 (1996), …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter Of: Edward Richman Ilene H. Richman, Debtors. Edward Richman Ilene H. Richman
v.
Galland, Kharasch, Morse & Garfinkle, Pc
95-3031.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Dec 13, 1996.
103 F.3d 119
Unpublished

103 F.3d 119

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
In the Matter of: Edward RICHMAN; Ilene H. Richman, Debtors.
Edward RICHMAN; Ilene H. Richman, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
GALLAND, KHARASCH, MORSE & GARFINKLE, PC, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-3031.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued Sept. 25, 1996.
Decided Dec. 13, 1996.

1

ARGUED: John G. Gill, Jr., GILL & SIPPEL, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellants. Helle Rung Weeke, GALLAND, KHARASCH, MORSE & GARFINKLE, P.C., Washington, D.C. for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Robert H. Morse, Robert D. Roseman, GALLAND, KHARASCH, MORSE & GARFINKLE, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

2

D.Md.

3

AFFIRMED.

4

Before ERVIN and HALL, Circuit Judges, and HALLANAN, United Stated District Judge for the Southern District of West Virginia, sitting by designation.

HALLANAN, District Judge:

5

Because in this case the district court sat as an appellate court in bankruptcy, our review of the district court's decision is plenary. In re Varat Enters., Inc., 81 F.3d 1310, 1316 (4th Cir.1996); In re Stanley, 66 F.3d 664, 667 (4th Cir.1995). With this in mind, after considering the record, the briefs submitted by the parties, and the oral argument of counsel, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. In re Richman, Civil Action No. AW-95-1854 (D. Md. filed October 23, 1995).

AFFIRMED