green
Positive treatment
2.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert C. Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.
(2×)
See Wesley College v. Pitts, 974 F.Supp. 375, 386 (D.Del.1997), aff'd, 172 F.3d 861 (3d Cir.1998) (affirmed by the Third Circuit in an unpublished disposition, which therefore has no precedential value); United States v. Reyes, 922 F.Supp. 818, 836 (S.D.N.Y.1996); Bohach v. City of Reno, 932 F.Supp. 1232, 1236-37 (D.Nev. 1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David v. Government of the Virgin Islands
See, e.g., United States v. Pungitore, 910 F.2d 1084, 1127 (3d Cir. 1990) (holding that the prosecutor’s reference to defendants as “cold-blooded murderer[s]” and “mob killers” during summation was not improper because it was a fair comment on evidence), aff’d, 172 F.3d 861 (3d Cir. 1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fraser v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.
See United States v. Steiger, 318 F.3d 1039, 1048-49 (11th Cir.2003); Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., 302 F.3d 868 (9th Cir.2002); Steve Jackson Games, Inc. v. U.S. Secret Serv., 36 F.3d 457 (5th Cir.1994); see also Wesley College v. Pitts, 974 F.Supp. 375 (D.Del.1997), summarily aff'd, 172 F.3d 861 (3d Cir.1998). 20 The first case to do so, Steve Jackson Games, noted that "intercept" was defined as contemporaneous in the context of an aural communication under the old Wiretap Act, 7 see United States v. Turk, 526 F.2d 654 (5th Cir.1976), and that when Congress amended the Wiretap Act in 198…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fraser v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
See United States v. Steiger, 318 F.3d 1039, 1048-49 (11th Cir.2003); Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., 302 F.3d 868 (9th Cir.2002); Steve Jackson Games, Inc. v. U.S. Secret Serv., 36 F.3d 457 (5th Cir.1994); see also Wesley College v. Pitts, 974 F.Supp. 375 (D.Del.1997), summarily aff'd, 172 F.3d 861 (3d Cir.1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In Re Anthony Williams
98-1876.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Nov 17, 1998.
Published
In re Anthony Williams
NO. 98-1876
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
November 17, 1998
Appeal From: E.D.Pa.
1
Mandamus Denied.