green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Oyathelemi v. LJ Ross and Associates
See Azar v. Hayter, 874 F.Supp. 1314, 1317 (N.D.Fla.), aff’d, 66 F.3d 342 (11th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1048 , 116 S.Ct. 712 , 133 L.Ed.2d 666 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Cook v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC
See Azar v. Hayter, 874 F.Supp. 1314, 1317 (N.D.Fla.), aff'd, 66 F.3d 342 (11th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1048 , 116 S.Ct. 712 , 133 L.Ed.2d 666 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Roban v. Marinosci Law Group
See Azar v. Hayter, 874 F.Supp. 1314, 1317 (N.D.Fla.1995), aff'd, 66 F.3d 342 (11th Cir.1995); Hart v. Clayton-Parker & Assoc’s, 869 F.Supp. 774, 777 (D.C.Ariz.1994) (“FDCPA claim and the claim on the underlying debt raise different legal and factual issues governed by different bodies of law.”).
cited
Cited "see"
Camille Haddad v. Alexander, Zelmanski, Danner & Fioritto
See Azar v. Hayter, 874 F.Supp. 1314, 1317 (N.D.Fla.), aff'd, 66 F.3d 342 (11th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1048 [ 116 S.Ct. 712 , 133 L.Ed.2d 666 ] (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Mohammad H. Chaudhry Diana M. Chaudhry v. Michael G. Gallerizzo Gebhardt & Smith, James E. Kiley, Jr., Mohammad H. Chaudhry Diana M. Chaudhry v. Michael G. Gallerizzo Gebhardt & Smith
See Azar v. Hayter, 874 F.Supp. 1314, 1317 (N.D.Fla.), aff'd, 66 F.3d 342 (11th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1048 , 116 S.Ct. 712 , 133 L.Ed.2d 666 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Chaudhry v. Gallerizzo
See Azar v. Hayter, 874 F.Supp. 1314, 1317 (N.D.Fla.), aff'd, 66 F.3d 342 (11th Cir.1995), ce rt. denied, 516 U.S. 1048, 116 S.Ct. 712 , 133 L.Ed.2d 666 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael G. Schroyer Gail R. Schroyer v. Kenneth P. Frankel Gerald M. Smith Company, L.P.A., D/B/A Smith & Smith
Additionally, we note that the FDCPA holds “debt collectors liable for various ‘abusive, deceptive, and unfair debt collection practices’ regardless of whether the debt is valid.” McCartney v. First City Bank, 970 F.2d 45, 47 (5th Cir.1992) (quoting 15 U.S.C. § 1692a); see also Azar v. Hayter, 874 F.Supp. 1314, 1317 (N.D.Fla.), aff'd, 66 F.3d 342 (11th Cir.1995) (holding that FDCPA claims have “nothing to do with whether the underlying debt is valid” and instead concern “the method of collecting the debt”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Wells
v.
Wells
94-8076.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Aug 28, 1995.
Published
U.S.
v.
Wells***
NO. 94-8076
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
Aug 28, 1995
Appeal From: M.D.Ga., No. 93-00015-CR-MAC
1
AFFIRMED.
*
Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 11th Cir.R. 34-3
**
Local Rule 36 case