Lori Sulolli v. Home Quarters Warehouse, Inc., 76 F.3d 380 (6th Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Lori Sulolli v. Home Quarters Warehouse, Inc., 76 F.3d 380 (6th Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
37 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Ira Littlejohn, Jr. (ca3, 2013-01-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Ira Littlejohn, Jr.
3rd Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lester, 76 F.3d 380 (6th Cir.1996).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Certain Land Situated in the City of Detroit
E.D. Mich. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See, United States v. Certain Land Situated in the City of Detroit, 873 F.Supp. 1050, 1054-1056 (E.D.Mich.1994), affirmed ("for the reasons stated by the [district] court"), 76 F.3d 380 , 1996 WL 26915 (1996) (unpublished opinion, text available on WESTLAW). 14 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lori Sulolli
v.
Home Quarters Warehouse, Inc.
95-1008.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Feb 7, 1996.
76 F.3d 380
Unpublished

76 F.3d 380

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Lori SULOLLI, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HOME QUARTERS WAREHOUSE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-1008.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 7, 1996.

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; CONTIE and BOGGS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

2

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.