Melvin P. Deutsch v. United States Dep't of Just. United States Marshals Serv., 85 F.3d 615 (4th Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Melvin P. Deutsch v. United States Dep't of Just. United States Marshals Serv., 85 F.3d 615 (4th Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases · …since strawbridge v. curtiss, 7 u.s. (3 cranch) 267 (1806), courts have interpreted section 1332 to require complete diversity between all parties. ⚠ not in text
56 citation events (28 in the last 25 years) across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jeffries v. Traverlers Property Casualty (mdd, 2022-04-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Jeffries v. Traverlers Property Casualty
D. Maryland · 2022 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
since strawbridge v. curtiss, 7 u.s. (3 cranch) 267 , 2 l.ed. 435 (1806), courts have interpreted section 1332 to require complete diversity between all parties.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Middel v. Middel
D. Maryland · 2020 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
since strawbridge v. curtiss, 7 u.s. (3 cranch) 267 (1806), courts have interpreted section 1332 to require complete diversity between all parties.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Middel v. Middel
D. Maryland · 2020 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
since strawbridge v. curtiss, 7 u.s. (3 cranch) 267 (1806), courts have interpreted section 1332 to require complete diversity between all parties.
cited Cited "see" Ayres v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
D. Maryland · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bianca Del Sempione v. Provident Bank of Maryland, 85 F.3d 615 (4th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (citing Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. (3 Cranch) 267 (1806)).
cited Cited "see" Knott v. Wexford Health Sources Inc.
D. Maryland · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Banca Del Sempione v. Provident Bank of Md., 85 F.3d 615 (4th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (citing Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. (3 Cranch) 267 (1806)).
cited Cited "see" Loya v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
D. Maryland · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Banca Del Sempione v. Provident Bank of Md., 85 F.3d 615 (4th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (citing Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. (3 Cranch) 267 (1806)).
cited Cited "see" Dillard v. BMW Financial Services NA, LLC
D. Maryland · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Banca Del Sempione v. Provident Bank of Maryland, 85 F.3d 615 (4th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (citing Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. (3 Cranch) 267 (1806)).
discussed Cited "see" Weir v. Paige (In Re Weir)
Bankr. E.D. Va. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ammirati v. Nellie Mae, Inc. (In re Ammirati), 187 B.R. 902, 905 (D.S.C.1995), aff'd, 85 F.3d 615 (4th Cir.1996) (noting courts in the Second, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and Eleventh Circuits have adopted the Brunner standard).
discussed Cited "see" Volvo Trademark Holding Aktiebolaget v. AIS Construction Equipment Corp.
W.D.N.C. · 2001 · signal: accord · confidence high
Co. v. MRF Ltd., Inc., 181 F.3d 759, 763 (6th Cir.1999); accord, Banca del Sempione v. Provident Bank of Maryland, 85 F.3d 615 (table), 1996 WL 181483 (4th Cir.1996) (citing Caperton v. Beatrice Pocahontas Coal Co., 585 F.2d 683 (4th Cir.1978)).
discussed Cited "see" Lohr v. Lubman (In Re Lohr)
Bankr. E.D. Va. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ammirati v. Nellie Mae, Inc. (In re Ammirati), 187 B.R. 902, 905 (D.S.C.1995), aff'd, 85 F.3d 615 (4th Cir.1996) (noting courts in the Second, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and Eleventh Circuits have adopted the Brunner standard).
discussed Cited "see" Hoyle v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency
Bankr. E.D. Pa. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ammirati v. Nellie Mae, Inc. (In re Ammirati), 187 B.R. 902, 906 (D.S.C.1995) (“minimal standard of living” is not co-extensive with living at poverty level), aff'd, 85 F.3d 615 (4th Cir.1996); Correll v. Union National Bank of Pittsburgh (In re Correll), 105 B.R. 302, 306 (W.D.Pa.1989) (discussed below).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Augustin v. U.S. Dep't of Educ. (In re Augustin)
Bankr. D. Md. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
Va. 2004) (citations omitted). *149 First Prong: Minimal Standard of Living Under the first prong of the Brunner test, a court must look at the debtor's current income and expenses and "examine the debtor's standard of living, 'with a view toward ascertaining whether the debtor has attempted to minimize the expenses of himself and his dependents.' " U.S. Dept. of Health & Human Serv's. v. Smitley, 347 F.3d 109 , 117 (4th Cir. 2003) (quoting Rice v. United States, 78 F.3d 1144 , 1149 (6th Cir. 1996) ); see also Ammirati v. Nellie Mae, Inc. (In re Ammirati) , 187 B.R. 902 , 907 (D.S.C. 1995) aff…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Mosley v. General Revenue Corp. (In Re Mosley)
Bankr. N.D. Ga. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also In re Ammirati, 187 B.R. 902, 907 (D.S.C.1995), aff'd, 85 F.3d 615 (4th Cir.1996); Ulm v. Educ.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re: Steven Lynn Hornsby Teresa Lynn Hornsby, Debtors. Tennessee Student Assistance Corporation v. Steven Lynn Hornsby Teresa Lynn Hornsby
6th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Ammirati v. Nellie Mae Inc. (In re Ammirati), 187 B.R. 902, 907 (D.S.C.1995) (discharging student loans of a debtor who, although having income significantly above the poverty guideline level, also had medical expenses and showed that he “had done everything possible to minimize expenses and maximize income”), aff'd, 85 F.3d 615 (4th Cir.1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Melvin P. Deutsch
v.
United States Department of Justice United States Marshals Service
95-7928.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Apr 29, 1996.
85 F.3d 615
Unpublished
2 passages pin-cited by 3 cases
Pinpoint authority: #23,223 of 633,719
Citer courts: D. Maryland (3)

85 F.3d 615

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Melvin P. DEUTSCH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; United States Marshals
Service, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7928.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 15, 1996.
Decided April 29, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-408-2)

Melvin P. Deutsch, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and appellant appealed. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. Deutsch v. United States Dep't of Justice, No. CA-95-408-2 (E.D.Va. Nov. 9, 1995) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.