green
Positive treatment
6.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1949 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1949
1987
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Celanese Corp. & Consolidated Subsidiaries v. United States
See Coffman v. Federal Laboratories, Inc., 171 F.2d 94, 98 (3d Cir. 1948), cert. denied, 336 U.S. 913 , 69 S.Ct. 603 , 93 L.Ed. 1076 (1949); E.I.
discussed
Cited "see"
Major v. Benton
See Coffman v. Federal Laboratories, Inc., 171 F.2d 94 (3d Cir. 1948), cert. denied, 336 U.S. 913 , 69 S.Ct. 603 , 93 L.Ed. 1076 (1949); 6 Moore’s Federal Practice 156.20[3.-4] at 56-1228-29 (2d ed. 1948).
discussed
Cited "see"
Major v. Benton
See Coffman v. Federal Laboratories, Inc., 171 F.2d 94 (3d Cir. 1948), cert. denied, 336 U.S. 913 , 69 S.Ct. 603 , 93 L.Ed. 1076 (1949); 6 Moore's Federal Practice P 56.20(3.-4) at 56-1228-29 (2d ed. 1948).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cook v. Cook
See Coffman v. Federal Laboratories, Inc., 171 F.2d 94, 98 (3rd Cir. 1948), cert. denied 336 U.S. 913 , 69 S.Ct. 603 , 93 L.Ed. 1076 (1949); Gerstle v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc., 298 F.Supp. 66 *168 (E.D.N.Y.1969); Wright and Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure, Civil § 2737, pp. 680-81.
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Lomprez, Jr., and Joseph William Smith
(3×)
See Meyers v. United States, 84 U.S.App.D.C. 101 , 171 F.2d 800 (1948), cert. denied, 336 U.S. 912 , 69 S.Ct. 602 , 93 L.Ed. 1076 (1949).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul R. Jones and Leo B. Mittelman
(3×)
See Meyers v. United States, 84 U.S.App.D.C. 101 , 171 F.2d 800, 806-807 (1948), cert, denied 336 U.S. 912 , 69 S.Ct. 602 , 93 L.Ed. 1076 (1949).
examined
Cited "see"
Gendelman v. United States
(3×)
See Barcott v. United States, 9 Cir., 1948, 169 F.2d 929, 930 , certiorari denied, 336 U.S. 912 , 69 S.Ct. 602 , 93 L.Ed. 1076 .
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Howard Edwin Reinecke
(3×)
See, e. g., Meyers v. United States, 84 U.S.App.D.C. 101, 112 , 171 F.2d 800, 811 (1948), cert. denied, 336 U.S. 912 , 69 S.Ct. 602 , 93 L.Ed. 1076 (1949); Standing Rules of the Senate, Rule V, fl 2, S.Doc. 92-1, 92d Cong., 1st Sess., 4 (1971); S. Robert.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
R. S. Willard Co. v. Columbia Van Lines Moving & Storage Co.
(3×)
See also Herzig v. Swift & Co., 146 F.2d 444 (2nd Cir. 1945), cited with approval in Meyers v. United States, 84 U.S.App.D.C. 101 , 171 F.2d 800 , 11 A.L.R.2d 1 (1948), cert. denied, 336 U.S. 912 , 69 S.Ct. 602 , 93 L.Ed. 1076 (1949). 8 .
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ernest Franklin Alexander
(3×)
See, e. g., Meyers v. United States, 84 U.S.App.D.C. 101 , 171 F.2d 800 (1948), cert, denied, 336 U.S. 912 , 69 S.Ct. 602 , 93 L.Ed. 1076 (1949); Herzig v. Swift & Co., 146 F.2d 444 (2d Cir. 1945) ; McCormick, Evidence § 195, at 409 (1954); IV Wigmore, Evidence § 1181 (3d ed. 1940).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Barcott
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 468.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 14, 1949.
Anthony M. Ursich for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Caudle, James M. Mclnerney and Ellis N. Slack for the United States.
Published
[*912] C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.