green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1954 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1954
1990
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Tennessee Gas Transmission Company v. Federal Power Commission, Manufacturers Light and Heat Company, Ohio Fuel Gas Company, and United Fuelgas Company v. Federal Power Commission
See State Corporation Comm. of Kansas v. ,F.P.C., 8 Cir., 206 F.2d 690 , certiorari denied 346 U.S. 922 , 74 S.Ct. 307 , 98 L.Ed. 416 , Columbia could be hurt in these circumstances only if Tennessee were to be permitted to withhold refunds to which Columbia might become entitled on the ground that it coul dnot recoup from zones 1, 5 and 6, and, therefore, it could not be required to refund excessive charges from zones 2, 3 and 4.
discussed
Cited "see"
Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. v. Federal Power Commission
See State Corporation Comm. of Kansas v. F. P. C., 8 Cir., 206 F.2d 690 , certiorari denied 346 U.S. 922 , 74 S.Ct. 307 , 98 L.Ed. 416 , Columbia could be hurt in these circumstances only if Tennessee were to be permitted to withhold refunds to which Columbia might become entitled on the ground that it could not recoup from zones 1, 5 and 6, and, therefore, it could not be required to refund excessive charges from zones 2, 3 and 4.
cited
Cited "see"
North Dakota v. Federal Power Commission
See State Corp. Commission of Kansas v. Federal Power Commission, 8 Cir., 1953, 206 F.2d 690, 707 , certiorari denied 346 U.S. 922 , 74 S.Ct. 307 , 98 L.Ed. 416 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State Of North Dakota v. Federal Power Commission
See State Corp. Commission of Kansas v. Federal Power Commission, 8 Cir., 1953, 206 F.2d 690, 707 , certiorari denipd 346 U.S. 922 , 74 S.Ct. 307 , 98 L.Ed. 416 . 19 That gas pipeline companies can be engaged in both intrastate as well as interstate business and have the intrastate portion not subject to FPC jurisdiction is illustrated by Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 1945, 324 U.S. 581, 585 , 65 S.Ct. 829 , 89 L.Ed. 1206 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State Corporation Commission of Kansas
v.
Federal Power Commission Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission and Federal Power Commission v. Northern Natural Gas Co.
v.
Federal Power Commission Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission and Federal Power Commission v. Northern Natural Gas Co.
No. 381; No. 382; No. 469.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 4, 1954.
Jay Kyle and Louis R. Gates for petitioner in No. 381. Richard J. Connor, Lawrence I. Shaw and F. Vinson Roach for the Northern Natural Gas Co. Acting Solicitor General Stern and Willard W. Gatchell for the Federal Power Commission in Nos. 381, 382 and 469. Also Assistant Attorney General Burger, Melvin Richter, Herman Marcuse and Reuben Goldberg for the Federal Power Commission in Nos. 381 and 382. Donald Evans for the Iowa Power & Light Co., Raymond A. Smith for the Council Bluffs Gas Co., George C. Pardee for the Metropolitan Utilities District of Omaha, Clarence H. Ross for the Central Electric & Gas Co., P. L. Farnand and G. T. Mullin for the Minneapolis Gas Co., Carl W. Cummins for the Northern States Power Co., Franklin M. Stone for the Western States Utilities Co., Norman H. Nitzkowski for the Minnesota Valley Natural Gas Co., George B. Sjoselius, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of Minnesota, and John F. Bonner for the City of Minneapolis, respondents in Nos. 381 and 382.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 206 F. 2d 690.