green
Positive treatment
1.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1954 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1954
1990
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Simpkins v. Southwestern Idaho Painters District Council No. 57
See also Building Trades Council v. Kinard Construction Co., 346 U.S. 933 , 74 S.Ct. 373 , 98 L.Ed. 423 (1954), reversing per curiam 258 Ala. 500 , 64 So.2d 400 (1953). . 346 U.S. at 500, 74 S.Ct. at 171.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schwegmann Bros. Giant Super Markets v. Louisiana Milk Commission
(2×)
See e.g., Huron Portland Cement Co. v. [City of] Detroit, 362 U.S. 440 , 4 L.Ed.2nd 852, 80 S.Ct. 813 , 78 ALR2d 1294, supra.’ “The contention that Congress had, by the enactment of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, pre-empted the field so as to exclude regulation of milk prices by the State of Virginia, was one of the contentions rejected by the Court in the County Board of Arlington County case [County Board of Arlington County, Virginia v. State Milk Commission (1954) 346 U.S. 932 , 74 S.Ct. 374 , 98 L.Ed. 423 ].
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
NORTHERN IMPROVEMENT COMPANY v. St. Peter
See also Building & Const. Trades Council v. Kinard Construction Company, 346 U.S. 933 , 74 S.Ct. 373 , 98 L.Ed. 423 ; Weber v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 348 U.S. 468 , 75 S.Ct. 480 , 99 L.Ed. 54 -6.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
County Board of Arlington County
v.
State Milk Commission
v.
State Milk Commission
No. 128.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 18, 1954.
Malcolm D. Miller argued the cause and filed a brief for appellants. Roger J. Whitejord argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief were J. Lindsay Almond, Jr., Attorney General of Virginia, and Thomas M. Miller, Assistant Attorney General.
Black.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia.
Per Curiam:The judgment is affirmed. Milk Control Board v. Eisenberg Farm Products, 306 U. S. 346.
Mr. Justice Black dissents.