green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gila Valley Irrigation District State of Arizona v. Gila River Indian Community San Carlos Apache Tribe San Carlos Irrigation District, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees
See United States v. Ahtanum Irrigation Dist., 236 F.2d 321, 340 (9th Cir.1956) (holding that agreement between Secretary of the Interior on behalf of the Indians and white settlers, "as other agreements relating to Indian rights, is to be construed most strongly in favor of the Indians"), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 988 , 77 S.Ct. 386 , 1 L.Ed.2d 367 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gila Valley Irrigation District
See United States v. Ahtanum Irrigation Dist., 236 F.2d 321, 340 (9th Cir.1956) (holding that agreement between Secretary of the Interior on behalf of the Indians and white settlers, “as other agreements relating to Indian rights, is to be construed most strongly in favor of the Indians”), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 988 , 77 S.Ct. 386 , 1 L.Ed.2d 367 (1957).
cited
Cited "see"
Hooker v. Edes Home
See Mount Vernon Mortgage Corp. v. United States, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 429 , 430, 236 F.2d 724, 725 (1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 988 , 77 S.Ct. 386 , 1 L.Ed.2d 367 (1957). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Ahtanum Irrigation District, 236 F.2d 321 (9th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 988 , 77 S.Ct. 386 , 1 L.Ed.2d 367 (1957); American Indian Policy at 147, 158-66. (4) Federal or State Concern.
discussed
Cited "see"
The Oneida Indian Nation of New York State, A/K/A the Oneida Indian Nation of New York, A/K/A the Oneida Indians of New York the Oneida Indian Nation of Wisconsin, A/K/A the Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin, Inc. And the Oneida of the Thames Band Council, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. The County of Oneida, New York and the County of Madison, New York, Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. State of New York, Third Party
See United States v. Ahtanum Irrigation District, 236 F.2d 321 (9th Cir.1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 988 , 77 S.Ct. 386 , 1 L.Ed.2d 367 (1957); American Indian Policy at 147, 158-66. 55 (4) Federal or State Concern. 56 As stated above the Indians have a federal common law possessory cause of action.
discussed
Cited "see"
Oneida Indian Nation of New York State v. Oneida
“It has long been held that adverse possession under a state statute of limitations cannot run against Indians if the land is not alienable by them, so long as such restrictions exist.” United States v. Schwarz, 460 F.2d 1365, 1371 (7th Cir. 1972); see United States v. Ahtanum Irrigation District, 236 F.2d 321 (9th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 988 , 77 S.Ct. 386 , 1 L.Ed.2d 367 (1957).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, and Spokane Tribe of Indians, Plaintiff-In-Intervention-Appellant v. Barbara J. Anderson, James M. Anderson
See also United States v. Ahtanum Irrigation District, 236 F.2d 321, 342 (9th Cir.1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 988 , 77 S.Ct. 386 , 1 L.Ed.2d 367 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stern v. Lucy Webb Hayes National Training School for Deaconesses & Missionaries
See, e.g., United States v. Mount Vernon Mortgage Corp., 128 F.Supp. 629 (D.D.C. 1954), aff’d, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 429 , 236 F.2d 724 (1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 988 , 77 S. Ct. 386 , 1 L.Ed.2d 367 (1957) ; Gilbert v. McLeod Infirmary, 219 S.C. 174 , 64 S.E.2d 524 (1951); Fowle Mem.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Retail Clerks International Association, Local No. 560
v.
J. J. Newberry Co.
v.
J. J. Newberry Co.
No. 597.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 28, 1957.
S. G. Lippman, Joseph E. Finley and Clarence M. Beck for appellants. Lemuel Skidmore for appellee.
Cited by 12 opinions | Published
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Idaho is reversed. Weber v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 348 U. S. 468; Garner v. Teamsters Union, 346 U. S. 485.