green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.4 score
“jurisdie-tional history of disputed lands is an important factor because it reveals the traditional understanding of the act, which has created justifiable expectations that should not be upset by a strained reading of the act.”
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Greger
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
jurisdie-tional history of disputed lands is an important factor because it reveals the traditional understanding of the act, which has created justifiable expectations that should not be upset by a strained reading of the act.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Gregor
jurisdictional history of disputed lands is an important factor because it reveals the traditional understanding of the act, which has created justifiable expectations that should not be upset by a strained reading of the act.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Shafer
(2×)
See State v. Madsen, 772 S.W.2d 656, 662 (Mo. banc 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1046 , 110 S.Ct. 845 , 107 L.Ed.2d 840 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel Lamar Ford
See United States v. Grey Bear, 883 F.2d 1382, 1393 (8th Cir.1989) (court is not required to grant change of venue absent evidence of actual juror prejudice), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1047 , 110 S.Ct. 846 , 107 L.Ed.2d 840 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Mary Jane ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUGAR TREE PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellee
See Bowyer v. United States Dept. of Air Force, 875 F.2d 632, 635 (7th Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 493 U.S. 1046 , 110 S.Ct. 846 , 107 L.Ed.2d 840 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mangino v. Department of the Army
See Bowyer v. United States Dep’t of Air Force, 875 F.2d 632, 635 (7th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1046 , 110 S.Ct. 846 , 107 L.Ed.2d 840 (1990); Diliberti v. United States, 817 F.2d 1259, 1262 (7th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shannon v. General Electric Co.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See id. at 9-10 (citing Manuel v. Veterans Admin.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stephen Washington, United States of America v. Christopher Jones
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Van Hemelryck, 945 F.2d at 1502 (framing the relevant inquiry as whether anything “ ‘in the confession itself or the record as a whole ... would have directly linked’ ” the defendant with the neutral term used in the redacted confession (emphasis added) (quoting United States v. Vasquez, 874 F.2d 1515, 1518 (11th Cir.1989) (per curiam))), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1046 , 110 S.Ct. 845 , 107 L.Ed.2d 840 (1990); Briscoe, 896 F.2d at 1502 (looking to evidence outside the codefendant’s confession to conclude that the term “we” did not necessarily refer to the defendant).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Emmons
(2×)
See United States v. Grey Bear, 883 F.2d 1382, 1386 (8th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 846 , 107 L.Ed.2d 840 (1990); cf. United States v. Davis, 2 USCMA 505, 511-12 , 10 CMR 3, 9-10 (1953).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Luis Manuel Espinoza, Also Known as Daniel Mendoza, United States of America v. Alejandro Montoya
See, e.g., United States v. Grey Bear, 883 F.2d 1382, 1392 (8th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1047 , 110 S.Ct. 846 , 107 L.Ed.2d 840 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. LaBrunerie
See also United States v. Grey Bear, 863 F.2d 572, 573-578 (8th Cir.1988) (en banc) (statement of Lay, J.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1047 , 110 S.Ct. 846 , 107 L.Ed.2d 840 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Miller
See also State v. Madsen, 772 S.W.2d 656, 658-59 [2] (Mo. banc 1989), cert. denied 493 U.S. 1046 , 110 S.Ct. 845 , 107 L.Ed.2d 840 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Operative Plasterers & Cement Masons International Ass'n v. Benjamin
Kontos v. United States Dept. of Labor, 826 F.2d 573 (7th Cir.1987); see also Bowyer v. United States, 875 F.2d 632, 635 (7th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1046 , 110 S.Ct. 846 , 107 L.Ed.2d 840 (1990); Crawford v. *1363 United, States, 796 F.2d 924, 928-29 (7th Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alice Gong, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Ray F. Gong, Deceased v. Edward Hirsch, M.D.
Medical Center, 811 F.2d 18, 20, 24-25 (1st Cir.1987) (district court did not abuse its discretion in prohibiting plaintiffs medical expert from relying on consulting doctor's handwritten note in a medical chart that described accidental episode that arguably caused plaintiff's injury; consulting doctor did not have personal knowledge of the incident in question and could not recall specifically where he obtained the information he recorded in the note); see also United States v. Grey Bear, 883 F.2d 1382, 1392-93 (8th Cir.1989) (Rule 703 does not allow medical expert to "circumvent the rules o…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Grey Bear
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 89-5814.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 16, 1990.
Published
Citer courts: South Dakota Supreme Court (2)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.