green
Positive treatment
6.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Engineered Products Co. v. Donaldson Co., Inc.
See John Morrell & Co. v. Local Union 304A of the United Food and Commercial Workers, AFL-CIO, 913 F.2d 544, 556 (8th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 500 U.S. 905 , 111 S.Ct. 1683 , 114 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Buckner
See *914 Ewing v. U.S., 914 F.2d 499, 502-03 (4th Cir.1990) (rejecting argument that prior to assessment taxpayer had no tax liability and therefore no “payment of’ taxes was due) (cert. denied, 500 U.S. 905 , 111 S.Ct. 1683 , 114 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991)).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum
(2×)
Accord John Morrell & Co. v. Local Union 304A, 913 F.2d 544 , 555-56 (8th Cir.1990) (recognizing and sustaining "joint defense" privilege as to an internal memorandum written by corporate general counsel that was shared with codefendants in another case), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 905 , 111 S.Ct. 1683 , 114 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991) (citations omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. United States
See Ewing v. United States, 914 F.2d 499, 503-04 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 905 , 111 S.Ct. 1683 , 114 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991); Ameel v. United States, 426 F.2d 1270, 1273 (6th Cir.1970); Lewyt Corp. v. Comm’r of I.R.S., 215 F.2d 518, 522 (2d Cir.1954), aff'd in part and rev’d in part on other grounds, 349 U.S. 237 , 75 S.Ct. 736 , 99 L.Ed. 1029 (1955); Blatt v. United States, 830 F.Supp. 882, 886-87 (D.S.C. 1993), aff'd, 34 F.3d 252 (4th Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Slovacek v. United States
See Alexander v. United States, 44 F.3d 328, 332-33 (5th Cir.1995) (citing Ewing v. United States, 914 F.2d 499, 505 (4th Cir.1990) (holding that § 7121 closing agreement does not bar refund claim based on statute of limitations), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 905 , 111 S.Ct. 1683 , 114 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991)).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re In-Store Advertising Securities Litigation
See John Morrell & Co. v. Local Union 304A, United Food and Commercial Workers, 913 F.2d 544, 556 (8th Cir.1990) (protection “cannot be waived without the consent of all parties to the defense”), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 905 , 111 S.Ct. 1683 , 114 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991); In re Sealed Case, 676 F.2d 793, 809 (D.C.Cir.1982) (protection is “not automatically waived by any disclosure to a third party”). 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
Delgado v. Shell Oil Co.
Accord, Joleewu, Ltd. v. City of Austin, 916 F.2d 250, 252-53 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 1683 , 114 L.Ed.2d 78 vacated in part on unrelated grounds, 934 F.2d 621 (5th Cir.1991) (“Under Texas law, one party may be estopped to assert a legal position against another if that position is inconsistent with a previous one.... [However, e]quitable estoppel bars the taking of inconsistent positions in judicial proceedings only if two other elements — reliance and injury of the opposing party — are also established.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Y & A Group Securities Litigation
See John Morrell & Co. v. Local Union 304A, 913 F.2d 544 , 562 (8th Cir.1990) (citing to other instances where court proceedings concluded before arbitration did), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 905 , 111 S.Ct. 1683 , 114 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ewart v. Y & A Group, Inc.
See John Morrell & Co. v. Local Union 304A, 913 F.2d 544 , 562 (8th Cir.1990) (citing to other instances where court proceedings concluded before arbitration did), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 905 , 111 S.Ct. 1683 , 114 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Solomon Blatt, Jr., as of the Estate of Solomon Blatt v. United States
See Ewing v. United States, 914 F.2d 499 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 905 , 111 S.Ct. 1683 , 114 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Executive Life Insurance v. Alexander Insurance
See id. § 10(d). “[W]e review de novo the district court’s decision to vacate the award.” John Morrell & Co. v. Local Union 304A of the United Food & Commercial Workers, 913 F.2d 544, 559 (8th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, — U.S. — —, 111 S.Ct. 1683 , 114 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Matter of the Arbitration Between: Executive Life Insurance Company of New York Executive Life Insurance Company of California v. Alexander Insurance Limited, Alexander Insurance Limited v. Executive Life Insurance Company of New York Executive Life Insurance Company of California
See id. § 10(d). "[W]e review de novo the district court's decision to vacate the award." John Morrell & Co. v. Local Union 304A of the United Food & Commercial Workers, 913 F.2d 544, 559 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 1683 , 114 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991). 6 Executive Life contends the district court committed error in concluding the arbitrators exceeded their authority in awarding a refund under the contracts.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Ellington
See Joleewu, Ltd. v. City of Austin, 916 F.2d 250, 252 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1683 , 114 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991). 15 *97 The doctrine “arises from the positive rules of procedure based on justice and sound public policy.” See Long v. Knox, 155 Tex. 581 , 291 S.W.2d 292, 295 (1956).
discussed
Cited "see"
Keller v. Blinder (In Re Blinder, Robinson & Co.)
See John Morrell & Co. v. Local Union 304A, 913 F.2d 544 , 555-56 (8th Cir.1990) (documents inadvertently provided to adversary by one party signatory to a joint defense agreement shielded for use against other signatory party by attorney-client privilege), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1683 , 114 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Durward Seals, A/K/A James Durwood Seals
See United States v. Russell, 913 F.2d 1288 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 59 U.S.L.W. 3741 (U.S.1991); United States v. Burns, 894 F.2d 334 (9th Cir.1990).
cited
Cited "see"
John Morrell & Company, Administrative Office of the United States, Intervenor v. Local Union 304a of the United Food and Commercial Workers, Afl-Cio and Clc United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio, and Clc, Rick Standing, Mark Anderson, Morris E. Buchholz, Leslie A. Sundermann, Jerone E. Nelson, Duane Skyberg, Robert B. Vanderwoude, Ray Handel, Frank Petheram, Debra L. Olson. John Morrell & Company, Administrative Office of the United States, Intervenor v. Local Union 304a of the United Food and Commercial Workers, Afl-Cio and Clc United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio, and Clc
See John Morrell & Co. v. Local Union 304A, 913 F.2d 544 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 1683 , 114 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
John Morrell & Co. v. Local Union 304A of the United Food & Commercial Workers
See John Morrell & Co. v. Local Union 304A, 913 F.2d 544 (8th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1683 , 114 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Siemens Medical Systems, Inc. v. Nuclear Cardiology Systems, Inc.
See, e.g., John Morrell & Co. v. Local Union 304A, 913 F.2d 544 , 563 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 905 , 111 S.Ct. 1683 , 114 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991); Dyndul v. *1434 Dyndul, 620 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir.1980) (“Finality for issue preclusion purposes is a more ‘pliant’ concept than it would be in other contexts..... [Finality] may mean little more than that the litigation of a particular issue has reached such a point that a court sees no really good reason for permitting it to be litigated again.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Interfaith Housing Delaware, Inc. v. Town of Georgetown
See, e.g., John Morrell & Co. v. Local Union SOkA of United Food and Commercial Workers, AFL-CIO, 913 F.2d 544, 556 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1683 , 114 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991) (co-defendant could not waive appellee’s attorney-client privilege); Metro Wastewater Reclamation Dist: v. Continental Casualty Co., 142 F.R.D. 471, 478 (D.Colo.1992) (applying Colorado law in an environmental coverage dispute, the court ruled that for documents subject to a joint defense privilege, “a waiver *1401 of the privilege requires the consent of all parties participating in the joint de…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jaan Karl Laaman, Richard C. Williams Barbara Jean Curzi v. United States
See, e.g., John Morrell & Co. v. Local Union 304A of the United Food & Commercial Workers, 913 F.2d 544 , 562 n. 16 (8th Cir.1990), cert. de nied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 1683 , 114 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991); In re Lewisville Properties, Inc. (Gray v. Cauble), 849 F.2d 946, 949 (5th Cir.1988); Kunzelman v. Thompson, 799 F.2d 1172, 1176 (7th Cir.1986); Gelb v. Royal Globe Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Philadelphia & Reading Corporation v. United States
(2×)
See generally 26 U.S.C.A. § 6214 (West 1989) (limiting jurisdiction of Tax Court so that it may only redetermine deficiency from particular single taxable year of dispute before it); see also Ewing v. United States, 914 F.2d 499, 504-05 (4th Cir.1990) (allowing IRS to retain overpayments for particular years since additional tax was actually due for those years, but ordering IRS to refund illegally assessed "overpayments" for other years), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 1683 , 114 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991). 72 Neither Lewis nor Ewing applies in our case since the taxpayer did not overpay and …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harrell et ux.
v.
Uniroyal-Goodrich Tire Co.
v.
Uniroyal-Goodrich Tire Co.
No. 90-1395.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 29, 1991.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.