green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1994 ·
…the effect of in this case is solely to prevent a particular remedy ... does not deprive plaintiffs, if wronged, of any other remedy that would not 'restrain or affect' the exercise of the receiver's or conservator's powers or functions
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 39 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States v. Federal Deposit Insurance
the effect of in this case is solely to prevent a particular remedy ... does not deprive plaintiffs, if wronged, of any other remedy that would not 'restrain or affect' the exercise of the receiver's or conservator's powers or functions
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
National Trust For Historic Preservation In The United States v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
the effect of in this case is solely to prevent a particular remedy ... does not deprive plaintiffs, if wronged, of any other remedy that would not 'restrain or affect' the exercise of the receiver's or conservator's powers or functions
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
de la Llana-Castellon v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Id. at 705.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Llana-Castellon v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Id. at 705.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Carlos B. Garcia v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Jamal Barghouti v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath, 339 U.S. 33, 49-50 , 70 S.Ct. 445, 454 , 94 L.Ed. 616 (1950); Kaczmarczyk v. INS, 933 F.2d 588, 595-96 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 5.Ct. 583, 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Trice v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
See Rosa v. Resolution Trust Corp., 938 F.2d 383 , 391–92 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 981 , 112 S. Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shubert v. Lucent Technologies Inc. (In Re Winstar Communications, Inc.)
See Rosa v. Resolution Trust Corp., 938 F.2d 383 , 392 n. 12 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 981 , 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991); see also F. Alderete General Contractors, Inc. v. United States, 715 F.2d 1476, 1480 (Fed.Cir.1983) (observing in government contracts action that “the decision below is at variance with the longstanding rule in the Federal courts that jurisdiction is determined at the time the suit is filed and, after vesting, cannot be ousted by subsequent events, including action by the parties”).
discussed
Cited "see"
New Rock Asset Partners, L.P. v. Preferred Entity Advancements, Inc.
See Rosa v. Resolution Trust Corp., 938 F.2d 383 , 392 n. 12 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 981 , 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991); see also F. Alderete General Contractors, Inc. v. United States, 715 F.2d 1476, 1480 (Fed.Cir.1983) (observing in government contracts action that "the decision below is at variance with the long-standing rule in the Federal courts that jurisdiction is determined at the time the suit is filed and, after vesting, cannot be ousted by subsequent events, including action by the parties").
discussed
Cited "see"
New Rock Asset Partners, L.P. v. Preferred Entity Advancements, Inc.
See Rosa v. Resolution Trust Corp., 938 F.2d 383 , 392 n. 12 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 981 , 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991); see also F. Alderete General Contractors, Inc. v. United States, 715 F.2d 1476, 1480 (Fed.Cir.1983) (observing in government contracts action that “the decision below is at variance with the ■ long-standing rule in the Federal courts that jurisdiction is determined at the time the suit is filed and, after vesting, cannot be ousted by subsequent events, including action by -the parties”).
cited
Cited "see"
Feigel v. Federal Deposit Insurance
See Rosa v. Resolution Trust Corp., 938 F.2d 383, 393-94 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 981 , 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991). .
cited
Cited "see"
Tri-State Hotels, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
See Rosa v. RTC, 938 F.2d 383, 392 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 981 , 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Tri-State Hotels, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
See Rosa v. RTC, 938 F.2d 383, 392 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 981 , 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Ramsey v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
See Kaczmarczyk v. I.N.S., 933 F.2d 588, 593 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 981 , 112 S.Ct. 583 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ramsey v. INS
See Kaczmarczyk v. I.N.S., 933 F.2d 588, 593 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 981 , 112 S.Ct. 583 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991). 8 Second, Ramsey contends that the BIA erred in denying Ramsey's application for relief from deportation pursuant to INA Sec. 212(c).
cited
Cited "see"
Clyde C. Freeman and Nancy F. Freeman v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Madison National Bank
See Rosa v. Resolution Trust Corp., 938 F.2d 383, 391-92 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 981 , 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Raymond Sekula and L. Kathleen Sekula v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Resolution Trust Corporation, Raymond F. Sekula and L. Kathleen Sekula
See Rosa v. Resolution Trust Corp., 938 F.2d 383 , 388 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991); 1 Gregory Pulles, et al., Firrea, Introduction (Supp. 1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Homeland Stores, Inc. v. Resolution Trust Corporation, and Bob's Super Saver, Inc.
See Rosa v. RTC, 938 F.2d 383, 392 (3d Cir.) (holding that FIR-REA’s jurisdictional bar does encompass a claim arising from post receivership actions of the RTC), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Charles House Condominium Ass'n
See Rosa v. RTC, 938 F.2d 388, 398 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Emeterio Rodriguez-Rivera v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See Kaczmarczyk v. INS, 933 F.2d 588, 595 (7th Cir.) (BIA “is entitled to a presumption of regularity,” and petitioner has burden to prove “BIA gave short shrift” to evidence presented), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 583 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael Alley v. Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver for the Federal Asset Disposition Association. Margaret Elizabeth Aristeguieta v. Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver for the Federal Asset Disposition Association
See 12 U.S.C. § 1821 (d)(6)(A) 8 Plaintiffs do not dispute that the various rules of state law upon which they based their suits "relate to" employee benefit plans 9 Corroboratively, FADA's Personnel Policy Manual stated that the retention benefits were designed to assure employees "a reasonable period of opportunity, with income, to pursue other gainful employment." Policy No. 820 (Addendum), Employee Retention Plan § I (dated Sept. 29, 1988), reprinted in Alley Stipulated Appendix at 202 10 The case the Aristeguieta plaintiffs cite on this issue, Rosa v. Resolution Trust Corp., 938 F.2d 38…
cited
Cited "see"
Hill v. Imperial Savings
See Rosa v. RTC, 938 F.2d 383 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jay M. Gross, as Trustee for Bell Savings Holdings, Inc. Money Purchase Pension Plan and Bell Savings Holdings, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan v. Bell Savings Bank Pa Sa, in Receivership, Resolution Trust Corporation as Receiver Bell Federal Savings Bank, in Conservatorship, Resolution Trust Corporation as Conservator Resolution Trust Corporation as Receiver for Bell Savings Bank Pasa (\Rtc-Receiver\") and Resolution Trust Corporation as Conservator for Bell Federal Bank (\"Rtc-Conservator\"). In No. 92-1196 Resolution Trust Corporation
See Rosa v. RTC, 938 F.2d 383, 388 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991). 13 Initially, we must determine whether a federal court has the power to enjoin the RTC's behavior.
cited
Cited "see"
Gross v. Bell Savings Bank PaSA
See Rosa v. RTC, 938 F.2d 383, 388 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Andrzej Osuch, Jan Sobol, Kazimierz Pajdo, Piotr Surowka and Jadwiga Surowka v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(2×)
See Kaczmarczyk v. INS, 933 F.2d 588 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 583 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991) (BIA can take notice that members of Solidarity are no longer being persecuted by Polish government.); Skalak v. INS, 944 F.2d 364 (7th Cir.1991) (BIA did not err in concluding that Polish national's fears of persecution were not well-founded in light of fact that past persecution resulted from Solidarity activities, Communist government had been overthrown, and Solidarity leader is now President of Poland.). 2 None of the petitioners have alleged facts sufficient to place them …
discussed
Cited "see"
Bender v. CenTrust Mortgage Corp.
See Rosa v. Resolution Trust Corp., 938 F.2d 383 , 391 n. 10 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991). 2 . 12 U.S.C. § 1821 (e)(7) provides as follows: (7) Provisions applicable to service contracts (A) Services performed before appointment In the case of any contract for services between any person and any insured depository institution for which the Corporation has been appointed conservator or receiver, any claim of such person for services performed before the appointment of the conservator or the receiver shall be— (i) a claim to be paid in accordance w…
discussed
Cited "see"
Telematics International, Inc. v. Nemlc Leasing Corporation
See Rosa v. Resolution Trust Corp., 938 F.2d 383, 397-98 (3d Cir.), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991); 281-300 Joint Venture v. Onion, 938 F.2d 35, 39 (5th Cir.1991), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 933 , 117 L.Ed.2d 105 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Serge Marquis v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Liquidating Agent of Hillsborough Bank & Trust Company, Eltrex International Corporation v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Liquidating Agent of Hillsborough Bank & Trust Company, Michael M. Mills v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Nashua Trust Company, James P. Goodrich v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Dartmouth Bank
See Rosa v. RTC, 938 F.2d 383, 393 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Marquis v. Federal Deposit Insurance
See Rosa v. RTC, 938 F.2d 383, 393 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
James B. WHATLEY, et al v. RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION as Receiver for Continental Savings, a Federal Savings and Loan Association
See Rosa v. Resolution Trust Corp., 938 F.2d 383 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991); see also Praxis Properties, Inc. v. Colonial Sav.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kosicki v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Co. v. City Sav., F.S.B., 28 F.3d 376, 383 (3d Cir.1994); see also Rosa v. RTC, 938 F.2d 383, 391-92 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 981 , 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991) (noting that the “statutory exhaustion requirement is indicated by the language ‘except as otherwise provided in this subsection.’ Subsection (d) of § 1821 provides for de novo district court jurisdiction only after the filing of a claim with, and the initial processing of that claim ____”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Julius Klausner
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Chesson, 933 F.2d 298, 304 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 981 , 112 S.Ct. 583 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991); United States v. Calles, 482 F.2d 1155, 1160 (5th Cir.1973).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Aljaf Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Federal Deposit Insurance
See, e.g., Rosa v. Resolution Trust Corp., 938 F.2d 383, 396 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 981 , 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Modular Homes, Inc.
“Although FIRREA does not explicitly mandate exhaustion of administrative remedies before judicial intervention, the language of the statute and indicated congressional intent make clear that such is required.” Meliezer v. RTC, 952 F.2d 879, 882 (5th Cir.1992); see also Rosa v. RTC, 938 F.2d 383, 391 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Tesfaye Aberra Gebremichael v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See, e.g., Kaczmarczyk v. INS, 933 F.2d 588, 593 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 583 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991); see generally 3 Kenneth C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Committee Disbursing Agent v. Resolution Trust Corp. (In re Valley Forge Plaza Associates)
See also Rosa v. Resolution Trust Corp., 938 F.2d 383, 391 (3d Cir.1991) [ cert. denied, [— U.S. -,] 112 S.Ct. 582 [, 116 L.Ed.2d 608 ] (1991)]; Resolution Trust Corp. v. Elman, 761 F.Supp. 245 (S.D.N.Y.1991); Re First City Nat’l Bank & Trust Co., 759 F.Supp. 1048, 1050 (S.D.N.Y.1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
National Trust For Historic Preservation In The United States v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
See, e.g., Rosa v. Resolution Trust Corp., 938 F.2d 383, 395 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States v. Federal Deposit Insurance
See, e.g., Rosa v. Resolution Trust Corp., 938 F.2d 383, 395 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Resolution Trust Corp. v. BEAUCHAMP CONST. CO.
Corp. v. Shain, Schaffer & Rafanello, 944 F.2d 129, 132 (3d Cir.1991) (emphasis added); see also Rosa v. Resolution Trust Corp., 938 F.2d 383, 391 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Barbara Ronda Meliezer, Wife Of/and Karl A. Loetzerich v. Resolution Trust Company, as Receiver for Home Savings and Loan Association
See e.g., Rosa v. Resolution Trust Corp., 938 F.2d 383 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 582 , 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991); Circle Indus.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tampam, Inc.
v.
Ogle County Board of Review
v.
Ogle County Board of Review
No. 91-371.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 2, 1991.
Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (2)
App. Ct. Ill., 2d Diet. Certiorari denied.