green
Positive treatment
8.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. State
See United States v. De Sisto, 329 F.2d 929, 934 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S.Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 (1964).
cited
Cited "see"
Topa Equities (V.I.) Ltd. v. Bared Jewelers of the V.I., Inc.
See Smith v. Government of the Virgin Islands, 4 V.I. 496 , 329 F.2d 135 (3d Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S. Ct. 1886 , 12 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mejia-Valez
See United States v. De Sisto, 329 F.2d 929, 933 (2d Cir.) ("The rule limiting the use of prior statements by a witness subject to cross-examination to their effect on his credibility has been described by eminent scholars and judges as 'pious fraud,' 'artificial,' ‘basically misguided,’ [and] 'mere verbal ritual.' "), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S.Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 (1964); Quartararo v. Mantello, 715 F.Supp. 449, 461 (E.D.N.Y.1989) (although state-court trial judge instructed jury to consider defendant's statement only for impeachment purposes and not for "affirmative evidence…
discussed
Cited "see"
Shippen v. Parrott
(2×)
See United States v. DeSisto, 329 F.2d 929 (2d Cir.1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S.Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 (1964); R.S.S. at 750 (In a trial to the court in which admissible evidence supports the findings, additional evidence, though inadmissible, is nonprejudicial). *87 Furthermore, the bulk of the alleged improper testimony concerned matters beyond the two-year statutory period, not the causes of action occurring during 1987.
cited
Cited "see"
Nance v. State
See United States v. De Sisto, 329 F.2d 929, 934 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S.Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 (1964).
cited
Cited "see"
Apperson v. Fleet Carrier Corporation
See Lanigan v. Local Union No. 9, 327 F.2d 627, 628 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S.Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 (1964).
cited
Cited "see"
Apperson v. Fleet Carrier Corp.
See Lanigan v. Local Union No. 9, 327 F.2d 627, 628 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S.Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 (1964).
cited
Cited "see"
Duttle v. Bandler & Kass
See United States v. De Sisto, 329 F.2d 929, 934 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S.Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 (1964); Nash v. Heckler, 108 F.R.D. 376, 377 (W.D.N.Y.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
David Vogel v. Donald Percy
The due process considerations attendant to the admission of a witness’ prior inconsistent statement as evidence in a criminal case were addressed by the Supreme Court in California v. Green, supra. The Court cautioned that Bridges could not be read as “declaring that the Constitution is necessar-' ily violated by the admission of a witness’ prior inconsistent statement for the truth of the matter asserted.” Green, 399 U.S. at 163 n. 15, 90 S.Ct. at 1937 n. 15; accord United States v. DeSisto, 329 F.2d 929, 933 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S.Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 (196…
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. DeSisto, 329 F.2d 929, 933 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S.Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 (1964); Jett v. Commonwealth, 436 S.W.2d 788, 792 (Ky.1969); State v. Igoe, 206 N.W.2d 291, 297 (N.D.1973); Gel haar v. State, 41 Wis.2d 230 , 163 N.W.2d 609, 614 (1969), cert. denied, 399 U.S. 929 , 90 S.Ct. 2250 , 26 L.Ed.2d 797 (1970); Fed.R.Evid. 801(d). .
cited
Cited "see"
Charles Martin and Paul N. Hankish v. United States
See United States v. DeSisto, 329 F.2d 929 (1964), cert. den. 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S.Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 (1964), and its progeny.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sidney Clark and Julia Clark v. Universal Builders, Inc.
We find plaintiffs’ statistical evidence to have been sufficiently competent; see United States v. Certain Interests in Property, etc., 326 F.2d 109 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 978 , 84 S.Ct. 1884 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 (1964), and probative of plaintiffs’ claim that defendants sold houses to blacks on price terms different from those they sold to white buyers similarly situated.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas M. Fahey
See United States v. De Sisto, 329 F.2d 929, 932 (2 Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S.Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter Louis Allsup, A/K/A Walter Lewis Allsup
See United States v. De Sisto, 329 F.2d 929 , cert. denied, 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S.Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 ; United States v. Cunningham, 446 F.2d 194 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fred A. Cunningham and Rudolph J. Trumpler
(2×)
See United States v. DeSisto, 329 F.2d 929, 933 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S.Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rudolph Izzi
See United States v. DeSisto, 329 F.2d 929, 935 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S.Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 (1964); Boehm v. United States, 271 F. 454 (2d Cir. 1921) (gaps of four and nine months between theft and possession).
discussed
Cited "see"
Goldsmith v. Cheney
(2×)
See State v. Goldberg, 261 N.C. 181 , 134 S.E.2d 334, 348 , certiorari denied 377 U.S. 978 , 84 S.Ct. 1884 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles T. Bennett, Wilbert Haywood, Elmer Jessup, Henry Stanton and Farris Thomas
See United States v. De Sisto, 329 F.2d 929 (2 Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S.Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 (1964). 6 III.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Schwartz
See United States v. De Sisto, 329 F.2d 929 (2nd Cir. 1964), cert. den. 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S.Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 (1964), and authorities cited in that case at pp. 933-934. 8 In United States v. Allied Stevedoring Corp., 241 F.2d 925, 933 (2nd Cir.1957), the court said: “It is one thing to put in a statement of a person not before the jury: that is indeed hearsay bare and unredeemed.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nicholas Crowder
(2×)
See 3 Wigmore, Evidence, § 1018 (3d Ed.1940) and the Second Circuit’s relevant discussion in United States v. DeSisto, 329 F.2d 929, 932-34 (1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 979 , 85 S.Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 (1964).
cited
Cited "see"
Arthur Eugene Byrd v. United States
See United States v. DeSisto, 2 Cir., 329 F.2d 929 , cert. denied 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S.Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Beckham v. United States
See also United States v. DeSisto, 329 F.2d 929, 933-34 (2d Cir.) (Friendly, J.) (noting that prior testimony under oath is given "with the oath administered not in any perfunctory fashion but in a setting calculated to impress the witness with the gravity of the responsibilities assumed"), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S.Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 (1964); see also FED.R.EVID. 801(d)(1)(A). [14] In criminal jury trials, a standard instruction given the jury at the start of trial explains: "It is important that you keep an open mind and not decide any issue in the case until the entire case ha…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph L. Gallo
See, e. g., United States v. DeSisto, 329 F.2d 929, 935 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S.Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 (1964); United States v. Izzi, supra, 427 F.2d at 297. 475 F.2d at 280 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Ex Rel. Winfield v. Cascles
See also United States v. De Sis-to, 329 F.2d 929 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S.Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Harry Oliver Linard, an Underwriter at Lloyd's, and Vainqueur Corporation, and Cross-Claimant
See also United States v. De Sisto, 329 F.2d 929 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S.Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 (1964). ' We come then to the principal question on this appeal — does the underwriter have the burden of proving that there was a scuttling by the preponderance of the evidence, or does the shipowner have the burden of persuading the trier by a preponderance of the evidence that the loss was within the policy, which burden is not met when the underwriter adduces evidence, which is “in equipoise” with the shipowner’s evidence, that there was a scuttling by explosion ?
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard Albert Jenkins
See, e. g., United States v. Desisto, 329 F.2d 929, 932-934 (2d Cir. *69 1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S. Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 (1964); United States v. Cunningham, 446 F.2d 194, 197-198 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 950 , 92 S.Ct. 302 , 30 L.Ed.2d 266 (1971).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Herbert R. Jacobs
See, e. g., United States v. Desisto, 329 F.2d 929, 935 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S.Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 (1964); United States v. Izzi, supra, 427 F.2d at 297 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Zochowski
See, e. g., United States v. Lefkowitz, 284 F.2d 310, 313 (2d Cir. 1960). . 427 F.2d 293 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 399 U.S. 928 , 90 S.Ct. 2244 , 26 L.Ed.2d 794 (1970). . 424 F.2d 991, 993-94 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 399 U.S. 92S, 90 S.Ct. 2246 , 26 L.Ed.2d 795 (1970). . 395 U.S. 6 , 89 S.Ct. 1532 , 23 L.Ed.2d 57 (1969). . 396 U.S. 398 , 90 S.Ct. 642 , 24 L.Ed.2d 610 (1970). . 329 F.2d 929 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S.Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 (1964). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Louis Cramer and Minnie K. Cramer
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Desisto, 329 F.2d 929, 934 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S.Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 (1964) (conviction sustained in part on basis of witness’s prior sworn testimony before grand jury).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ray
(2×)
See also United States v. De Sisto, 329 F.2d 929 (CA 2d Cir.) (Friendly, J.), cert. denied 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S.Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 (1964); United States v. Block, 88 F.2d 618, 620 (CA 2d Cir.) (L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Chas. Pfizer & Co.
See United States v. Kahaner, 317 F.2d 459, 467-468 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, Keogh v. United States, 375 U.S. 836 , 84 S.Ct. 73 , 11 L.Ed.2d 65 (1963); United States v. Lefkowitz, 284 F.2d 310, 315 (2d Cir. 1960); see also United States v. DeSisto, 329 F.2d 929, 932 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 979 , 84 S.Ct. 1885 , 12 L.Ed.2d 747 (1964).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Certain Interests in Property in the Borough of Brooklyn, County of Kings, State of New York
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 1059.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 15, 1964.
Bernard L. Bermant, George B. Kenner and Herbert Monte Levy for petitioners., Solicitor General Cox, Roger P. Marquis and Edmund B. Clark for the United States.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.