green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S v. Ocean Express Miami
See All Pacific Trading, Inc. v. Vessel M/V HANJIN YOSU, 7 F.3d 1427, 1432 (9th Cir.1993) (“At the very least, Plaintiffs initiation of this suit constituted acceptance of the terms of the Hanjin bills of lading.”) cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1194 , 114 S.Ct. 1301 , 127 L.Ed.2d 653 (1994); Mitsui & Co. (USA), Inc. v. MIRA M/V, 111 F.3d 33, 36 (5th Cir.1997) (“the district court did not err in determining that, by filing a lawsuit for damages under the bill of lading, [the shipper] has accepted the terms of the bill of lading, including the unnegotiated forum selection clause”); F.D.
cited
Cited "see"
United States ex rel. Schumer v. Hughes Aircraft Co.
See All Pacific Trading, Inc. v. Vessel M/V Hanjin Yosu, 7 F.3d 1427, 1434 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1301 , 127 L.Ed.2d 653 (1994). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hughes Aircraft Company
See All Pacific Trading, Inc. v. Vessel M/V Hanjin Yosu, 7 F.3d 1427, 1434 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1301 , 127 L.Ed.2d 653 (1994) 5 The only requirements regarding direct and indirect costs explicitly stated in the cited section of the regulations are that contractors must (1) file disclosure statements that set forth their accounting practices and the bases upon which they have made classifications of costs as direct or indirect; (2) treat costs consistently as either direct or indirect across contracts; and (3) amend the disclosure statement if they make any cha…
cited
Cited "see"
Destination Ventures, Ltd. v. Federal Communications Commission
See All Pacific Trading, Inc. v. Vessel M/V Hanjin Yosu, 7 F.3d 1427, 1434 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1301 , 127 L.Ed.2d 653 (1994). 15 AFFIRMED.
cited
Cited "see"
Destination Ventures, Ltd. v. Federal Communications Commission
See All Pacific Trading, Inc. v. Vessel M/V Hanjin Yosu, 7 F.3d 1427, 1434 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1301 , 127 L.Ed.2d 653 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chugach Timber Corp. v. Northern Stevedoring & Handling Corp. (In re Chugach Forest Products, Inc.)
See All Pacific Trading, Inc. v. Vessel M/V Hanjin Yosu, 7 F.3d 1427, 1431 (9th Cir.1993) (“Generally, a vessel is viewed as a juristic person, responsible in rem for the acts and omissions of her personnel, separate and distinct from her owner.... [In an in rem action,] [t]he owner of a vessel is an interested party, but not a necessary one.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1301 , 127 L.Ed.2d 653 (1994); Alyeska Pipeline Serv.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Chugach Forest Products, Inc.
See All Pacific Trading, Inc. v. Vessel M/V Hanjin Yosu, 7 F.3d 1427, 1431 (9th Cir.1993) ("Generally, a vessel is viewed as a juristic person, responsible in rem for the acts and omissions of her personnel, separate and distinct from her owner.... [In an in rem action,] [t]he owner of a vessel is an interested party, but not a necessary one."), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1301 , 127 L.Ed.2d 653 (1994); Alyeska Pipeline Serv.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hanjin Container Lines, Inc.
v.
Tokio Fire & Marine Ins. Co., Ltd.
v.
Tokio Fire & Marine Ins. Co., Ltd.
93-1189.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 21, 1994.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Hanjin Container Lines, Inc.
v.
Tokio Fire & Marine Ins. Co., Ltd., et al.
No. 93-1189.
Supreme Court of United States.
March 21, 1994.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 9th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 7 F. 3d 1427.