Janosik v. Brown, 114 S. Ct. 1303 (Vet. App. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Janosik v. Brown, 114 S. Ct. 1303 (Vet. App. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2011 · …district court may decline to award costs listed in the statute but may not award costs omitted from the list ⚠ not in text
91 citation events (28 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Baisden v. I'M READY PRODUCTIONS, INC. (txsd, 2011-06-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Baisden v. I'M READY PRODUCTIONS, INC. (2×)
S.D. Tex. · 2011 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
district court may decline to award costs listed in the statute but may not award costs omitted from the list
cited Cited "see" Rodriguez v. Rodriguez
Ind. Ct. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Indiana Bd. Of Public Welfare v. Tioga Pines, 622 N.E.2d 935, 939-940 (Ind.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1195 , 114 S.Ct. 1302 , 127 L.Ed.2d 654 (1994).
cited Cited "see" Jaehnen v. Booker
Ind. Ct. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Indiana Bd. Of Public Welfare v. Tioga Pines, 622 N.E.2d 935, 939-40 (Ind.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1195 , 114 S.Ct. 1302 , 127 L.Ed.2d 654 (1994).
cited Cited "see" Sizemore v. Erie Insurance Exchange
Ind. Ct. App. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Indiana Bd. Of Public Welfare v. Tioga Pines, 622 N.E.2d 935, 939-940 (Ind.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1195 , 114 S.Ct. 1302 , 127 L.Ed.2d 654 (1994).
cited Cited "see" Shelter Insurance Co. v. Woolems
Ind. Ct. App. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Indiana Bd. Of Public Welfare v. Tioga Pines, 622 N.E.2d 935, 939-940 (Ind.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. *1154 1195, 114 S.Ct. 1302 , 127 L.Ed.2d 654 (1994).
cited Cited "see" J.M. Corp. v. Roberson
Ind. Ct. App. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Indiana Bd. Of Public Welfare v. Tioga Pines, 622 N.E.2d 935, 939-940 (Ind.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1195 , 114 S.Ct. 1302 , 127 L.Ed.2d 654 (1994).
cited Cited "see" Pedraza v. City of East Chicago
Ind. Ct. App. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Indiana Bd. Of Public Welfare v. Tioga Pines, 622 N.E.2d 935, 939-940 (Ind.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1195 , 114 S.Ct. 1302 , 127 L.Ed.2d 654 (1994).
cited Cited "see" Welter v. F.A. Wilhelm Construction
Ind. Ct. App. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Indiana Bd. Of Public Welfare v. Tioga Pines, 622 N.E.2d 935, 939-940 (Ind.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1195 , 114 S.Ct. 1302 , 127 L.Ed.2d 654 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" Hoogenboom-Nofziger v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
Ind. T.C. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See State Bd. of Public Welfare v. Tioga Pines Living Ctr., 622 N.E.2d 935, 939 (Ind.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1195 , 114 S.Ct. 1302 , 127 L.Ed.2d 654 (1994); Matonovich v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 705 N.E.2d 1093, 1096 (Ind. Tax Ct.1999), review denied.
cited Cited "see" Res-Care, Inc. v. Indiana Family & Social Services Administration
Ind. Ct. App. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Indiana Bd. of Public Welfare v. Tioga Pines, 622 N.E.2d 935, 938 (Ind.1993), cert. denied 510 U.S. 1195 , 114 S.Ct. 1302 , 127 L.Ed.2d 654 (1994).
cited Cited "see" Chavis v. Patton
Ind. Ct. App. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Indiana Bd. of Public Welfare v. Tioga Pines Living Center, Inc., 622 N.E.2d 935, 946 (Ind.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1195 , 114 S.Ct. 1302 , 127 L.Ed.2d 654 .
discussed Cited "see" Garonzik v. Whitman Diner (2×)
D.N.J. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Coats v. Penrod Drilling Corp., 5 F.3d 877 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1303 , 127 L.Ed.2d 654 (1994); Echostar Satellite Corp. v. Advanced Communications Corp., 902 F.Supp. 213 (D.Colo. 1995); Fressell v. AT & T Technologies, Inc., 103 F.R.D. 111 (N.D.Ga.1984) (holding that expenses of videotaping and playback are limited to § 1821 witness fees).
cited Cited "see" Indiana State Board of Public Welfare v. Tioga Pines Living Center, Inc.
Ind. Ct. App. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Indiana State Board of Public Welfare v. Tioga Pines Living Center (1998), Ind., 622 N.E.2d 935 , cert. denied, —U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 1302 , 127 L.Ed.2d 654 .
discussed Cited "see" Horn v. Seacatcher Fisheries, Inc.
Or. Ct. App. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See n 1, supra. 4 The parties do not address the materiality of plaintiffs employment status to his unseaworthiness claim. 5 Cf. Coats v. Penrod Drilling Corp., 5 F3d 877 (5th Cir 1993), cert den_US-, 114 S Ct 1303 , reh’g en banc granted 20 F3d 614 (5th Cir 1994) (foreign corporation that recruited employees in Mississippi was subject to suit in Mississippi by Mississippi resident employee who was injured in the defendant’s service in foreign waters; in addition to recruiting activities in Mississippi, the defendant corporation had contracted to return the plaintiff to Mississippi once a …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Seghers v. El Bizri (2×)
N.D. Tex. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
A court must consider all factors when making the purposeful availment inquiry — “no single factor, particularly the number of contacts, is determinative.” Stuart v. Spademan, 772 F.2d 1185, 1192 (5th Cir.1985). “[WJhether the minimum contacts are sufficient to justify subjection of the non-resident to suit in the forum is determined not on a mechanical and quantitative test, but rather under the particular facts upon the quality and nature of the activity with relation to the forum state.” Mississippi Interstate Express, Inc. v. Transpo, Inc., 681 F.2d 1003, 1006 (5th Cir.1982); see…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Charles W. JANOSIK
v.
Jesse BROWN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
No. 93-1211.
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.
Mar 21, 1994.
114 S. Ct. 1303
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 72%
Citer courts: S.D. Texas (2)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.