U. S. A. Direct, Inc. v. North Am. Commc'ns, Inc., 513 U.S. 1152 (1995). · Go Syfert
Search
U. S. A. Direct, Inc. v. North Am. Commc'ns, Inc., 513 U.S. 1152 (1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“section 105(a) allows the bankruptcy courts to inject traditional equitable principles into the operation of the bankruptcy system to prevent abuse of the drafter's intent.”
22 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Raytech Corp. (ctb, 1998-07-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) In Re Raytech Corp.
Bankr. D. Conn. · 1998 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
section 105(a) allows the bankruptcy courts to inject traditional equitable principles into the operation of the bankruptcy system to prevent abuse of the drafter's intent.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
U. S. A. Direct, Inc.
v.
North American Communications, Inc.
No. 94-1116.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1995.
513 U.S. 1152
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 62%
Citer courts: D. Connecticut (1)

Ct. Common Pleas of Pa., York County. Certiorari denied.