Ellingsworth v. Reynolds, 513 U.S. 1102 (1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Ellingsworth v. Reynolds, 513 U.S. 1102 (1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Wiggins v. State (md, 1999-02-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Wiggins v. State (2×)
Md. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See, for example, Hill v. Lockhart, 28 F.3d 832 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1102 , 115 S.Ct. 778 , 130 L.Ed.2d 673 (1995) (no investigation of significant psychiatric history, including positive reaction to anti-psychotic medication); Austin v. Bell, 126 F.3d 843 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 (1998) (no mitigation evidence presented; no investigation made of mitigating circumstances); Hendricks v. Calderon, 70 F.3d 1032 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1111 , 116 S.Ct. 1335 , 134 L.Ed.2d 485 (1996) (no investigation into any mitigati…
cited Cited "see" State v. Sylvester Smith
Tenn. Crim. App. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hill v. Lockhart, 28 F.3d 832 (8th Cir. 1994), reh’g denied, (1995), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1102 , 115 S.Ct. 778 (1995).
discussed Cited "see" Andre Brown v. Robert Kuhlmann, Superintendent of Sullivan Correctional Facility
2d Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Vidal v. Williams, 31 F.3d 67, 69 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1102 , 115 S.Ct. 778 , 130 L.Ed.2d 672 (1995) (holding that without more, the fact that audience members live in the same borough where an undercover officer works does not justify closure on the basis of concerns for the officer’s cover).
discussed Cited "see" Pruett v. Norris
E.D. Ark. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586, 604 , 98 S.Ct. 2954, 2964-65 , 57 L.Ed.2d 973 (sentencer should “not be precluded from considering, os a mitigating factor, any aspect of a defendant’s character or rec-ord____”) “ ‘Given the severity of the potential sentence and the reality that the life of [the defendant’] was at stake, “we believe that it was [counsel’s] duty ... to collect as much information as possible about [the defendant] for use at the penalty phase of his state trial.” Hill v. Lockhart, 28 F.3d 832, 845 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1102 , 115 S.Ct. 778 ,…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Morales v. Coyle
N.D. Ohio · 2000 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Hill v. Lockhart, 28 F.3d 832 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1102 , 115 S.Ct. 778 , 130 L.Ed.2d 673 (U.S.1995): Kenley v. Armontrout, 937 F.2d 1298 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 964 , 112 S.Ct. 431 , 116 L.Ed.2d 450 (1991); Thomas v. Lockhart, 738 F.2d 304 (8th Cir.1984).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Mason v. Schriver
S.D.N.Y. · 1998 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Vidal v. Williams, 31 F.3d 67, 69 (2d Cir.1994), [ce rt. denied, 513 U.S. 1102 , 115 *329 S.Ct. 778, 130 L.Ed.2d 672 (1995) ].
Ellingsworth, Warden
v.
Reynolds
No. 94-438.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1995.
513 U.S. 1102
Published

C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.