green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mayes
See United States v. Camacho, 40 F.3d 349, 355 (11th Cir.1994) (“Generally, we do not consider claims of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal, because there usually has been insufficient opportunity to develop the record regarding the merits of these claims.”), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1090 , 115 S.Ct. 1810 , 131 L.Ed.2d 735 (1995). 7 .All of the appellants raise the double jeopardy issue on appeal except Baker, Moore and Nurur-din. 8 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bankston
See United States v. Camacho, 40 F.3d 349, 354 (11th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1090 , 115 S.Ct. 1810 , 131 L.Ed.2d 735 (1995). 4 a term exceeding one year, regardless of whether such offense is specifically designated as a felony and regardless of the actual sentence imposed.” U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2, comment. (n.3) (Nov. 1, 1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. McCord
See United States v. Howell, 37 F.3d 1197, 1202 (7th Cir.1994), mandate recalled, 37 F.3d 1207 (7th Cir.1994), reh and suggestion for reh en banc denied, (Dec. 21, 1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1810 , 131 L.Ed.2d 735 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Montgomery, Shelton Wade
Compare United States v. Camacho, 49 F.3d 349 (11th Cir. 1994) (court made specific findings of fact after an evidentiary hearing regarding defend- ant’s credibility), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1090 , 115 S.Ct. 1810 , 131 L.Ed.2d 735 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Montgomery, Shelton Wade
Compare United States v. Camacho, 49 F.3d 349 (11th Cir. 1994) (court made specific findings of fact after an evidentiary hearing regarding defend- ant’s credibility), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1090 , 115 S.Ct. 1810 , 131 L.Ed.2d 735 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ATTERBURY, CHARLES JOSEPH Jr.
Compare United States v. Camacho, 49 F.3d 349 (11th Cir. 1994) (court 4 made specific findings of fact after an evidentiary hearing regarding defendant’s credibility), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1090 , 115 S.Ct. 1810 , 131 L.Ed.2d 735 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gallego v. United States
(2×)
Compare United States v. Camacho, 40 F.3d 349 (11th Cir.1994)(court made specific findings of fact after an evidentiary hearing regarding defendant’s credibility), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1090 , 115 S.Ct. 1810 , 131 L.Ed.2d 735 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3958, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6451 United States of America v. Mary Peggy Moore, United States of America v. Lee Roy Wiley
(2×)
See also United States v. Howell, 37 F.3d 1197, 1202 (7th Cir.), mandate recalled for limited purpose of permitting appellants to file petitions for rehearing, 37 F.3d 1207 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 1810 , 131 L.Ed.2d 735 (1995); United States v. Straach, 987 F.2d 232, 239 (5th Cir.1993); United States v. Hern, 926 F.2d 764, 768 (8th Cir.1991); United States v. Lawrence, 680 F.2d 1126, 1128 (6th Cir.1982); and United States v. Brooks, 611 F.2d 614, 617 (5th Cir.1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Samuels
United States Sentencing Guidelines § IB 1.10; see also, United States v. Camacho, 40 F.3d 349, 353-54 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 1810 , 131 L.Ed.2d 735 (1995). 13 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Paris
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 94-8604.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 24, 1995.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.