green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.6 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2005 · 2 courts ·
…burden-shifting model applies to pretrial proceedings, not to the jury's evaluation of evidence at trial
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Zive v. Stanley Roberts, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
burden-shifting model applies to pretrial proceedings, not to the jury's evaluation of evidence at trial
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Baker v. National State Bank
burden-shifting model applies to pretrial proceedings, not to the jury's evaluation of evidence at trial
cited
Cited "see"
Wesley v. Palace Rehabilitation & Care Center, L.L.C.
See Red v. Potter, 211 Fed.Appx. 82, 83 (3d Cir.2006) (citing Sempier v. Johnson & Higgins, 45 F.3d 724, 729 (3d Cir.1995)), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1159 , 115 S.Ct. 2611 , 132 L.Ed.2d 854 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Peregrine Systems, Inc.
See Sempier v. Johnson & Higgins, 45 F.3d 724, 729 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1159 , 115 S.Ct. 2611 , 132 L.Ed.2d 854 *806 (1995)(to establish a prima facie case plaintiff may point to “sufficient age difference between himself and his replacement such that a fact-finder can reasonably conclude that the employment decision was made on the basis of age” but no particular age difference must be shown).
cited
Cited "see"
Miller v. Berry Metal Co.
See Sempier v. Johnson & Higgins, 45 F.3d 724, 728 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1159 , 115 S.Ct. 2611 , 132 L.Ed.2d 854 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Neiderlander v. American Video Glass Co.
See Sempier v. Johnson & Higgins, 45 F.3d 724, 728 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1159 , 115 S.Ct. 2611 , 132 L.Ed.2d 854 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert W. SHANK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KELLY-SPRINGFIELD TIRE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant
Mary’s Honor Ctr. v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502, 511 , 113 S.Ct. 2742, 2749 , 125 L.Ed.2d 407 (1993)); see Gehring v. Case Corp., 43 F.3d 340, 343 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1159 , 115 S.Ct. 2612 , 132 L.Ed.2d 855 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matthew King v. Hendricks County Commissioner
Maravilla v. United States, 60 F.3d 1230 , 1233–34 (7th Cir. 1995); see also Scott v. Henrich, 39 F.3d 912, 915 (9th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1159 (1995) (“In other words, the court may not simply accept what may be a self-serving account by the police officer.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matthew King v. Hendricks County Commissioner
Maravilla v. United States, 60 F.3d 1230 , 1233–34 (7th Cir. 1995); see also Scott v. Henrich, 39 F.3d 912, 915 (9th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1159 (1995) (“In other words, the court may not simply accept what may be a self-serving account by the police officer.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McGrath v. Tavares
See Abraham v. Raso, 183 F.3d 279, 294 (3 Cir., 1999); see also Scott v. Henrich, 39 F.3d 912, 915 (9 Cir., 1994), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1159 , 115 S.Ct. 2612 , 132 L.Ed.2d 855 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. Nissan North America, Inc.
See, e.g., Gehring v. Case Corp., 43 F.3d 340, 342-43 (7th Cir.1994) (privacy interests was proper basis upon which to disallow counsel from “root[ing] through the personnel files.”), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1159 , 115 S.Ct. 2612 , 132 L.Ed.2d 855 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clifford Michael Johnson v. Nissan North America, Inc.
See, e.g., Gehring v. Case Corp., 43 F.3d 340 , 342- 43 (7th Cir.1994) (privacy interests was proper basis upon which to disallow counsel from "root[ing] through the personnel files."), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1159 , 115 S.Ct. 2612 , 132 L.Ed.2d 855 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
O'Bert v. Vargo
See, e.g., Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1, 3, 11 , 105 S.Ct. 1694 , 85 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985); see also Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 230-32 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983) (existence of probable cause is to be determined on the basis of the totality of the circumstances). 26 Where officers attempting to make an arrest used deadly force, the objective reasonableness inquiry, for purposes of either Fourth Amendment liability or qualified immunity, "depends only upon the officer's knowledge of circumstances immediately prior to and at the moment that he made the split-second decision to e…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
O'Bert ex rel. Estate of O'Bert v. Vargo
Where officers attempting to make an arrest used deadly force, the objective reasonableness inquiry, for pur poses of either Fourth Amendment liability or qualified immunity, “depends only upon the officer’s knowledge of circumstances immediately prior to and at the moment that he made the split-second decision to employ.deadly force,” Salim v. Proulx, 93 F.3d at 92 (qualified immunity); see Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. at 396 , 109 S.Ct. 1865 (“With respect to a claim of excessive force” during arrest, in violation of the Fourth Amendment, the standard is the “reasonableness [of the…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rayl v. Fort Wayne Community Schools
Baron, 195 F.3d at 338 ; Visser v. Packer Eng’g Assocs., Inc., 924 F.2d 655, 657 (7th Cir.1991) (en banc); Konowitz v. Schnadig Corp., 965 F.2d 230, 232 (7th Cir.1992); Oxman v. WLS-TV, 846 F.2d 448, 452 (7th Cir.1988) (Oxman I); see also Gehring v. Case Corp., 43 F.3d 340, 344 (7th Cir.1994), cert, denied, 515 U.S. 1159 , 115 S.Ct. 2612 , 132 L.Ed.2d 855 (1995)..
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Boyle v. County of Allegheny
Accordingly, “the appellate court is required to apply the same test the district court should have utilized.” Chipollini v. Spencer Gifts, Inc., 814 F.2d 893, 896 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. dismissed, 483 U.S. 1052 , 108 S.Ct. 26 , 97 L.Ed.2d 815 (1987); see also Sempier v. Johnson & Higgins, 45 F.3d 724, 727 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1159 , 115 S.Ct. 2611 , 132 L.Ed.2d 854 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Boyle v. County Of Allegheny Pennsylvania
Accordingly, "the appellate court is required to apply the same test the district court should have utilized." Chipollini v. Spencer Gifts, Inc., 814 F.2d 893, 896 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. dismissed, 483 U.S. 1052 , 108 S.Ct. 26 , 97 L.Ed.2d 815 (1987); see also Sempier v. Johnson & Higgins, 45 F.3d 724, 727 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1159 , 115 S.Ct. 2611 , 132 L.Ed.2d 854 (1995). 67 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c), a motion for summary judgment will be granted 68 if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the af…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Onwuka v. Federal Express Corp.
See, e.g., Gehring v. Case Corp., 43 F.3d 340, 342-43 (7th Cir. 1994) (privacy interests was proper basis upon which to disallow counsel from “root[ing] through the personnel files.”), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1159 , 115 S.Ct. 2612 , 132 L.Ed.2d 855 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The Mill
v.
Colorado Department of Health
v.
Colorado Department of Health
No. 94-1706.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 26, 1995.
515 U.S. 1159
Sup. Ct. Colo. Certiorari denied.