green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Cathryn E. Hinshaw v. LOPFI
See Barnard v. Jackson County, Mo., 43 F.3d 1218, 1224 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 808 , 116 S.Ct. 53 , 133 L.Ed.2d 17 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hinshaw v. Smith
See Barnard v. Jackson County, Mo., 43 F.3d 1218, 1224 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 808 , 116 S.Ct. 53 , 133 L.Ed.2d 17 (1995). 26 The Board's interests as Hinshaw's employer clearly outweighed Hinshaw's interests in speaking out as a private citizen, and Hinshaw's speech was not protected by the First Amendment.
discussed
Cited "see"
Graves v. Arkansas Department of Finance & Administration
See Barnard v. Jackson County, Mo., 43 F.3d 1218, 1226 (8th Cir.) (finding that issue of whether protected speech played substantial role in public employee’s termination is ordinarily issue of fact for jury), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 808 , 116 S.Ct. 53 , 133 L.Ed.2d 17 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
R. Scott Sexton v. Ronald Martin
See Barnard v. Jackson County, Mo., 43 F.3d 1218, 1225 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 808 , 116 S.Ct. 53 , 133 L.Ed.2d 17 (1995); Brockell v. Norton, 732 F.2d 664, 668 (8th Cir.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Doyas Ingram Mark Barbaree v. Dave Johnson, Individually and in His Official Capacity Donald Webb, Individually and in His Official Capacity
See Barnard v. Jackson County, Mo., 43 F.3d 1218, 1225 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 808 , 116 S.Ct. 53 , 133 L.Ed.2d 17 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith Barney Inc. v. Vogele
(2×)
See PaineWebber Inc. v. Allen, 888 F.Supp. 53 (E.D.Va.1993), aff'd, 45 F.3d 427 (4th Cir.) (unpublished), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 52 , 133 L.Ed.2d 17 (1995). .
cited
Cited "see"
Bullock v. SC Ventures Inc
See Trinity Indus., Inc. v. Myers & Assocs., Ltd., 41 F.3d 229, 230 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 52 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pyle v. Hatley
(2×)
“Out-of-state legal representation does not establish purposeful availment of the privilege of conducting activities in the forum state, where the law firm is solicited in its home state and takes no affirmative actions to promote business within the forum state.” Sher v. Johnson, 911 F.2d 1357, 1363 (9th Cir.1990); see also Trinity Indus., Inc. v. Myers & Assoc., Ltd., 41 F.3d 229, 230 (5th Cir.) (“The bare existence of an attorney-client relationship is not sufficient” to establish the requisite minimum contacts necessary for personal jurisdiction), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 807 , 116 S…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Albert Burnham v. Lawrence Ianni
See, e.g., Barnard v. Jackson County, Missouri, 43 F.3d 1218, 1224 (8th Cir.) (stating pertinent considerations for Pickering balancing test are “whether the employee’s speech has a detrimental impact on working relationships where personal loyalty or confidence is necessary, and whether the speech impedes the efficient operation of the governmental entity’s function”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 53 , 133 L.Ed.2d 17 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Burnham v. Ianni
See, e.g., Barnard v. Jackson County, Missouri, 43 F.3d 1218, 1224 (8th Cir.) (stating pertinent considerations for Pickering balancing test are "whether the employee's speech has a detrimental impact on working relationships where personal loyalty or confidence is necessary, and whether the speech impedes the efficient operation of the governmental entity's function"), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 53 , 133 L.Ed.2d 17 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Myers & Associates, Ltd.
v.
Trinity Industries, Inc.
v.
Trinity Industries, Inc.
No. 94-1842.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1995.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.