green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
5.5 score
“gte offers no separate analysis under the state constitution. accordingly, we assume, without deciding, that the analysis is the same under article i, section 18, of the oregon constitution, and the takings clause of the fifth amendment to the constitution of the united states.”
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Zoeller v. United States
when the facts alleged in the complaint reveal 'any possible basis on which the non-movant might prevail, the motion must be denied.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Freedom Socialist Party v. Bradbury
gte offers no separate analysis under the state constitution. accordingly, we assume, without deciding, that the analysis is the same under article i, section 18, of the oregon constitution, and the takings clause of the fifth amendment to the constitution of the united states.
discussed
Cited "see"
Georgeff v. United States
See Hamlet v. United States, 63 F.3d 1097, 1107 (Fed.Cir.1995), ce rt. denied, 517 U.S. 1155 , 116 S.Ct. 1542 , 134 L.Ed.2d 646 (1996); see also Crocker v. United States, 125 F.3d 1475, 1476 (Fed.Cir.1997); Collins v. United States, 67 F.3d 284, 288 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied (1995) (citing additional cases); LeBlanc v. United States, 50 F.3d at 1028 ; Mullenberg v. United States, 857 F.2d 770, 773 (Fed.Cir.1988); Murray v. United States, 817 F.2d 1580, 1583 (Fed.Cir.1987); United States v. Connolly, 716 F.2d 882, 886-87 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1065 , 104 S.Ct. 1414 , 79 L.Ed.2d…
discussed
Cited "see"
Sumter v. United States
See Hamlet v. United States, 63 F.3d 1097, 1107 (Fed.Cir.1995), ce rt. denied, 517 U.S. 1155 , 116 S.Ct. 1542 , 134 L.Ed.2d 646 (1996); see also Crock er v. United States, 125 F.3d 1475, 1476 (Fed.Cir.1997); LeBlanc v. United States, 50 F.3d 1025, 1028 (Fed.Cir.1995); Collins v. United States, 67 F.3d 284, 288 (Fed.Cir.1995) (citing additional cases); Mullenberg v. United States, 857 F.2d 770, 773 (Fed.Cir.1988); Murray v. United States, 817 F.2d 1580, 1583 (Fed.Cir.1987); United States v. Connolly, 716 F.2d 882, 886-87 (Fed.Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1065 , 104 S.Ct. 1414 , 79 L.Ed.2d…
cited
Cited "see"
Novell, Inc. v. United States
See Hamlet v. United States, 63 F.3d 1097, 1101 (Fed.Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1155 , 116 S.Ct. 1542 , 134 L.Ed.2d 646 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Hicks v. Humble Oil and Refining Co.
See Trahan v. Trahan, 894 S.W.2d 113, 118 (Tex.App.—Austin 1995, writ denied), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1155 , 116 S.Ct. 1542 , 134 L.Ed.2d 646 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dyck v. Albertelli Law
Corp. v. United States, 178 Ct.Cl. 599, 607 , 372 F.2d 1002, 1009 (1967)); see also Hamlet v. United States, 63 F.3d 1097, 1107 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied, en banc suggestion declined (Fed.Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1155 , 116 S.Ct. 1542 , 134 L.Ed.2d 646 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Waltner v. United States
Corp. v. United States, 178 Ct.Cl. 599, 607 , 372 F.2d 1002, 1009 (1967)); see also Hamlet v. United States, 63 F.3d 1097, 1107 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied, en banc suggestion declined (Fed.Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1155 , 116 S.Ct. 1542 , 134 L.Ed.2d 646 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hernandez v. United States
Corp. v. United States, 178 Ct.Cl. 599, 607 , 372 F.2d 1002, 1009 (1967)); see also Hamlet v. United States, 63 F.3d 1097, 1107 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied, en banc suggestion declined (Fed.Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1155 , 116 S.Ct. 1542 , 134 L.Ed.2d 646 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Moore v. United States
To prove that a statute or regulation is money mandating, plaintiff must demonstrate that an independent source of substantive law relied upon “can fairly be interpreted as mandating compensation by the Federal Government for the damages sustained.” United States v. Mitchell, 463 U.S. at 217, 103 S.Ct. 2961 (quoting United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. at 400 , 96 S.Ct. 948 and Eastport Steamship Corp. v. United States, 178 Ct.Cl. 599, 607 , 372 F.2d 1002, 1009 (1967)); see also Hamlet v. United States, 63 F.3d 1097, 1107 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied, en banc suggestion declined (Fed.Cir.1995),…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Akinro v. United States
To prove that a statute or regulation is money mandating, plaintiff must demonstrate that an independent source of substantive law relied upon “can fairly be interpreted as mandating compensation by the Feder-al Government for the damages sustained.” United States v. Mitchell, 463 U.S. at 217, 103 S.Ct. 2961 (quoting United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. at 400 , 96 S.Ct. 948 and Eastport Steamship Corp. v. United States, 178 Ct.Cl. 599, 607 , 372 F.2d 1002, 1009 (1967)); see also Hamlet v. United States, 63 F.3d 1097, 1107 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied, en banc suggestion declined (Fed.Cir.1995)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Modena v. Neff
To prove that a statute or regulation is money mandating, plaintiff must demonstrate that an independent source of substantive law relied upon “can fairly be interpreted as mandating compensation by the Federal Government for the damages sustained.” United States v. Mitchell, 463 U.S. at 217, 103 S.Ct. 2961 (quoting United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. at 400 , 96 S.Ct. 948 and Eastport Steamship Corp. v. United States, 178 Ct.Cl. 599, 607 , 372 F.2d 1002, 1009 (1967)); see also Hamlet v. United States, 63 F.3d 1097, 1107 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied, en banc suggestion declined (Fed.Cir.1995),…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. United States
Corp. v. United States, 178 Ct.Cl. 599, 607 , 372 F.2d 1002, 1009 (1967)); see also Hamlet v. United States, 63 F.3d 1097, 1107 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied, en banc suggestion declined (Fed.Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1155 , 116 S.Ct. 1542 , 134 L.Ed.2d 646 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Young v. United States
To prove that a statute or regulation is money mandating, plaintiff must demonstrate that an independent source of substantive law relied upon “can fairly be interpreted as mandating compensation by the Federal Government for the damages sustained.” United States v. Mitchell, 463 U.S. at 217, 103 S.Ct. 2961 (quoting United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. at 400 , 96 S.Ct. 948 and Eastport Steamship Corp. v. United States, 178 Ct.Cl. at 607, 372 F.2d at 1009); see also Hamlet v. United States, 63 F.3d 1097, 1107 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied, en banc suggestion declined (Fed.Cir.1995), cert. denied…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. United States
To prove that a statute or regulation is money mandating, plaintiff must demonstrate that an independent source of substantive law relied upon “can fairly be interpreted as mandating compensation by the Federal Government for the damages sustained.” United States v. Mitchell, 463 U.S. at 217, 103 S.Ct. 2961 (quoting United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. at 400 , 96 S.Ct. 948 and Eastport Steamship Corp. v. United States, 178 Ct.Cl. at 607 , 372 F.2d at 1009 ); see also Hamlet v. United States, 63 F.3d 1097, 1107 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied, en banc suggestion declined (Fed.Cir.1995), cert. deni…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sageman v. United States
To prove that a statute or regulation is money mandating, plaintiff must demonstrate that an independent source of substantive law relied upon “can fairly be interpreted as mandating compensation by the Federal Government for the damages sustained.” United States v. Mitchell, 463 U.S. at 217, 103 S.Ct. 2961 (quoting United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. at 400 , 96 S.Ct. 948 and Eastport Steamship Corp. v. United States, 178 Ct.Cl. at 607 , 372 F.2d 1002 , 372 F.2d at 1009 ); see also Hamlet v. United States, 63 F.3d 1097, 1107 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied, en banc suggestion declined (Fed.Cir.1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rutledge v. United States
See United States v. Connolly, 716 F.2d at 886-87 ; see also Hamlet v. United States, 63 F.3d 1097, 1107 (Fed.Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1155 , 116 S.Ct. 1542 , 134 L.Ed.2d 646 (1996); Featheringill v. United States, 217 Ct.Cl. 24, 33 , 1978 WL 5755 (1978); Rosano v. United States, 9 Cl.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tinsley v. United States
See United States v. Connolly, 716 F.2d at 886-87 ; see also Hamlet v. United States, 63 F.3d 1097, 1107 (Fed.Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1155 , 116 S.Ct. 1542 , 134 L.Ed.2d 646 (1996); Featheringill v. United States, 217 Ct.Cl. 24, 33 , 1978 WL 5755 (1978); Rosano v. United States, 9 Cl.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nalette v. States
See United States v. Connolly, 716 F.2d at 886-87 ; see also Hamlet v. United States, 63 F.3d 1097, 1107 (Fed.Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1155 , 116 S.Ct. 1542 , 134 L.Ed.2d 646 (1996); Featheringill ¶.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Beach v. United States
See United States v. Connolly, 716 F.2d at 886-87 ; see also Hamlet v. United States, 63 F.3d 1097, 1107 (Fed.Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1155 , 116 S.Ct. 1542 , 134 L.Ed.2d 646 (1996); Featheringill v. United States, 217 Ct.Cl. 24, 33 , 1978 WL 5755 (1978); Rosano v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 137, 142 (1985), aff'd, 800 F.2d 1126 (Fed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ogden v. United States
See United States v. Connolly, 716 F.2d 882, 886-87 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1065 , 104 S.Ct. 1414 , 79 L.Ed.2d 740 (1984); see also Hamlet v. United States, 63 F.3d 1097, 1107 (Fed.Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1155 , 116 S.Ct. 1542 , 134 L.Ed.2d 646 (1996); Featheringill v. United States, 217 Ct.Cl. 24, 33 , 1978 WL 5755 (1978); Rosano v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 137, 142 (1985), aff'd, 800 F.2d 1126 (Fed.Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 907 , 107 S.Ct. 1350 , 94 L.Ed.2d 521 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cleveland
See Scott, 436 U.S. at 140 , 98 S.Ct. at 1724 ; see also, London, 66 F.3d at 1236 (1st Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1542 , 134 L.Ed.2d 646 (1996); United States v. Ozar, 50 F.3d 1440, 1447 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 193 , 133 L.Ed.2d 128 (1995); United States v. Earls, 42 F.3d 1321, 1325 (10th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1085 , 115 S.Ct. 1800 , 131 L.Ed.2d 727 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
London
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 95-1156.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 22, 1996.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Oregon (1) · Federal Claims (1)
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.