green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
In re Johnson
See In re Jones, 63 F.3d 411, 412 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1167 , 116 S.Ct. 1566 , 134 L.Ed.2d 666 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
MARBURY LAW GROUP, PLLC v. Carl
See Int’l Ambassador Programs, Inc. v. Archexpo, 68 F.3d 387, 341 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1167 , 116 S.Ct. 1567 , 134 L.Ed.2d 666 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ford v. Loftin (In Re Ford)
Bank (In re Glendenning), 243 B.R. 629 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.2000); In re Samaniego, 224 B.R. 154, 163 , (Bankr.E.D.Wash.1998); Smith v. London (In re Smith), 224 B.R. 44 (Bankr.E.D.Mich.1998); New Orleans Airport Motel Assocs., Ltd. v. Lee (In re Servico, Inc), 144 B.R. 933 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.1992); see Jones v. Garcia (In re Jones), 63 F.3d 411 , 413 n. 6 (5th Cir.1995), ce rt. denied, 517 U.S. 1167 , 116 S.Ct. 1566 , 134 L.Ed.2d 666 (1996); Venn v. Bazzel (In re Lambert), 273 B.R. 663 (Bankr.N.D.Fla.2002) (§ 549(a) is inapplicable where postpetition tax sale is void as violation of § 362(a)). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Biagro Western Sales, Inc. v. Helena Chemical Co.
See Quantum Corp. v. Rodime, PLC, 65 F.3d 1577, 1580 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1167 , 116 S.Ct. 1567 , 134 L.Ed.2d 666 (1996); Vitronics, 90 F.3d at 1582 ; Intellicall, Inc. v. Phonometrics, Inc., 952 F.2d 1384, 1387 (Fed.Cir.1992); Envirotech Corp. v. Al George, Inc., 730 F.2d 753, 759 (Fed.Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Caterpillar Inc. v. Detroit Diesel Corp.
Id. (citing Intellicall, Inc. v. Phonometrics, Inc., 952 F.2d 1384, 1388 (Fed.Cir.1992)); see Quantum Corp. v. Rodime, PLC, 65 F.3d 1577, 1580 (Fed.Cir.1995) (“[T]he words of a claim will be given their ordinary meaning to one of skill in the art unless the inventor appeared to use them differently.”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 1567 , 134 L.Ed.2d 666 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Texas Instruments Incorporated v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Lsi Logic Corporation, and Vlsi Technology, Inc.
See Quantum Corp. v. Rodime, PLC, 65 F.3d 1577, 1580 , 36 USPQ2d 1162, 1165 (Fed.Cir.1995) (“[T]he words of a claim will be given their ordinary meaning to one of skill in the art unless the inventor appeared to use them differently.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1567 , 134 L.Ed.2d 666 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cleanox Environmental Services, Inc. v. Hudson Environmental Services, Inc.
See Cybor Corp., 138 F.3d at 1466-67 (Mayer, C.J.concurring); Vitronics, 90 F.3d at 1582 ; see also Quantum Corp. v. *608 Rodime, PLC, 65 F.3d 1577, 1580 (Fed.Cir.1995), ce rt. denied, 517 U.S. 1167 , 116 S.Ct. 1567 , 134 L.Ed.2d 666 (1996); Markman, 52 F.3d at 979 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Portola Packaging, Inc.
See 35 U.S.C. § 305 (1994) (“No proposed amendment or new claim enlarging the scope of a claim of a patent will be permitted in a reexamination proceeding under this chapter.”); 37 C.F.R. § 1.552 (b) (1996) (“Amended or new claims presented during a reexamination proceeding must not enlarge the scope of the claims of the patent____”); see also Quantum Corp. v. Rodime, PLC, 65 F.3d 1577, 1584 , 36 USPQ2d 1162, 1168 (Fed.Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1567 , 134 L.Ed.2d 666 (1996) (holding claims invalid because their scope was enlarged during reexamination).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Archexpo Commerce & Industry Centre
v.
International Ambassador Programs, Inc.
v.
International Ambassador Programs, Inc.
No. 95-1365.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 29, 1996.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.