green
Positive treatment
1.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Saldin Securities, Inc. v. Snohomish County
Pierce County Sheriff, 98 Wn.2d at 695 (quoting State v. Rowe, 93 Wn.2d 277, 284 , 609 P.2d 1348 (1980)); see also Heinmiller v. Department of Health, 127 Wn.2d 595, 609 , 903 P.2d 433 (1995), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1006 , 116 S. Ct. 2526 , 135 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Saldin Securities, Inc. v. Snohomish County
Pierce County Sheriff, 98 Wash.2d at 695 , 658 P.2d 648 (quoting State v. Rowe, 93 Wash.2d 277, 284 , 609 P.2d 1348 (1980)); see also Heinmiller v. Department of Health, 127 Wash.2d 595, 609 , 903 P.2d 433 (1995), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 116 S.Ct. 2526 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1051 (1996); King County v. Boundary Review Bd., 122 Wash.2d 648, 680 , 860 P.2d 1024 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Doucette
v.
Superior Court of California, County of San Diego (San Diego Unified Port District, Real Party in Interest)
v.
Superior Court of California, County of San Diego (San Diego Unified Port District, Real Party in Interest)
No. 95-1786.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1996.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Cer-tiorari denied.