green
Positive treatment
5.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Connie E. Doyle v. Raley's Incorporated
But see, Austin v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc., 78 F.3d 875, 885 (4th Cir.1996) (holding that a collective bargaining agreement to arbitrate is binding upon individual employees even when dispute involves federal cause of action), ce rt. denied, -U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 432 , 136 L.Ed.2d 330 (1996).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Phillips v. CIGNA Investments, Inc.
Co., 147 F.3d 453 (5th Cir.1998) (upholding a pre-dispute, mandatory arbitration clause in the Title VII context); Seus v. John Nuveen & Co., 146 F.3d 175, 183 (3d Cir.1998) (disagreeing with Duffield); Austin v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc., 78 F.3d 875 (4th Cir.) (upholding an anticipatory agreement to arbitrate Title VII and ADA claims), cert. de *350 nied, — U.S. -, 117, S. Ct. 432, 136 L.Ed.2d 330 (1996).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Araiza v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Co.
S. Ct. 432, 136 L.Ed.2d 330 (1996), is the minority view on this issue.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Two Parcels of Real Property Located at 101 North Liberty Street & 105 Liberty Street in Clanton
See San Pedro v. United States, 79 F.3d 1065 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 980 , 117 S.Ct. 431 , 136 L.Ed.2d 330 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Smallwood v. Gibson
See Smallwood v. Oklahoma, 519 U.S. 980 , 117 S.Ct. 431 , 136 L.Ed.2d 330 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Miller v. State
(2×)
See Smallwood v. State, 1995 OK CR 60, ¶ 62 , 907 P.2d 217, 233 , cert. denied, — U.S. —, 117 S.Ct. 431 , 136 L.Ed.2d 330 (1996). 177 Finally, the trial court did not err by denying an instruction to the jury on the presumption of life.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sheila Warnock SEUS, Appellant, v. JOHN NUVEEN & CO., INC.
See Austin v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc., 78 F.3d 875, 881-82 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 432 , 136 L.Ed.2d 330 (1996); Matthews v. Rollins Hudig Hall Co., 72 F.3d 50 , 53 n. 4 (7th Cir.1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Duffield v. Robertson Stephens & Co.
See Austin v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc., 78 F.3d 875, 880-82 (4th Cir.) (holding that employees can be compelled to submit ADA and Title VII claims to binding arbitration pursuant to collective bargaining agreement), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 432 , 136 L.Ed.2d 330 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
76 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1450, 73 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,397, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,202, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4837 Tonyja Duffield v. Robertson Stephens & Company, a Partnership Robertson Stephens & Company, a Corporation
See Austin v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc., 78 F.3d 875, 880-82 (4th Cir.) (holding that employees can be compelled to submit ADA and Title VII claims to binding arbitration pursuant to collective bargaining agreement), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 432 , 136 L.Ed.2d 330 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
William Partridge James Zagorski William Stojack v. Robert B. Reich Helen Haase U.S. Department of Labor
See Conlan v. United States Dep’t of Labor, 76 F.3d 271, 274 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 431 , 136 L.Ed.2d 330 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Slaughter v. State
(2×)
See Smallwood v. State, 907 P.2d 217, 233 (Okl.Cr.1995), cert. denied,U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 431 , 136 L.Ed.2d 330 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Abendschein v. Montgomery County, Md.
See Austin v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc., 78 F.3d 875, 879 (4th Cir.) (quoting Adkins v. Times-World Corp., 771 F.2d 829, 831 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 896 , 88 L.Ed.2d 930 (1986)), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 432 , 136 L.Ed.2d 330 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
James R. Penny v. United Parcel Service
See Austin v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc., 78 F.3d 875 , cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 432 , 136 L.Ed.2d 330 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chopra v. Display Producers, Inc.
See Austin v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container, 78 F.3d 875 (4th Cir.) (affirming grant of summary judgment to employer on the grounds that the plaintiff had failed to submit Title VII and ADA claims to mandatory arbitration under collective bargaining agreement), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 432 , 136 L.Ed.2d 330 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Igbonwa
See San Pedro v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 79 F.3d 1065, 1072 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 431 , 136 L.Ed.2d 330 (1996). 5 In Thomas , the alien entered into a plea agreement with a United States Attorney which specifically stated that “the United States of America (hereafter “Government,” which term includes its departments, officers, agents and agencies) ... will not oppose any motions made by your counsel for reduction of sentence, modification or relief from deportation to the Court, parole commission and U.S. Immigration Service.” 35 F.3d at 1335 n.…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, No. 96-1848 v. Franklin Uzo Igbonwa A/K/A Franklin Uzowa, A/K/A Francis Igwe, A/K/A Laz Igbonwa. United States of America v. Franklin Uzo Igbonwa A/K/A Franklin Uzowa, A/K/A Francis Igwe, A/K/A Laz Igbonwa Franklin Igbonwa, No. 97-1054
See San Pedro v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 79 F.3d 1065, 1072 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 431 , 136 L.Ed.2d 330 (1996). 5 23 In Thomas, the alien entered into a plea agreement with a United States Attorney which specifically stated that "the United States of America (hereafter "Government," which term includes its departments, officers, agents and agencies) ... will not oppose any motions made by your counsel for reduction of sentence, modification or relief from deportation to the Court, parole commission and U.S. Immigration Service." 35 F.3d at 1335 n. 1.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Abrams v. Trunzo
(2×)
See, e.g., San Pedro v. United States, 79 F.3d 1065, 1069-70 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 431 , 136 L.Ed.2d 330 (1996) (holding that U.S. attorneys may have implied authority to plea bargain as an integral part of their express authority to prosecute, but that they do not have the implied authority to bind the INS by a plea bargain concerning deportation because the INS has express authority over deportation proceedings); City of El Centro, 922 F.2d at 821 (finding that border patrol agents had no implied authority to obligate U.S. funds for medical services provided to …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Abrams v. Trunzo
See, e.g., San Pedro v. United States, 79 F.3d 1065, 1069-70 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 431 , 136 L.Ed.2d 330 (1996) (holding that U.S. attorneys may have implied authority to plea bargain as an integral part of their express authority to prosecute, but that they do not have the implied authority to bind the INS by a plea bargain concerning deportation because the INS has express authority over deportation proceedings); City of El Centro, 922 F.2d at 821 (finding that border patrol agents had no implied authority to obligate U.S. funds for medical services provided to …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clifford Brisentine v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation
Compare Pryner, 109 F.3d at 359 (7th Cir.)(holding that the FAA is generally applicable to collective bargaining agreements) with Austin v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container Inc., 78 F.3d 875, 879 (4th Cir.) (noting that “in this circuit, the FAA is not applicable to labor disputes arising from collective bargaining agreements”) (citations omitted), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 432 , 136 L.Ed.2d 330 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brisentine v. Stone & Webster Eng.
Compare Pryner, 109 F.3d at 359 (7th Cir.)(holding that the FAA is generally applicable to collective bargaining agreements) with Austin v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container Inc., 78 F.3d 875, 879 (4th Cir.) (noting that "in this circuit, the FAA is not applicable to labor disputes arising from collective bargaining agreements") (citations omitted), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 432 , 136 L.Ed.2d 330 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Autek Systems Corp.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 96-66.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 12, 1996.
Published
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.