green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.5 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2005 · 2 courts ·
…depression has been held to constitute a mental impairment.
at p. 2453
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Roseann Thorne v. Welk Investment, Inc. William Welk Marcia Paul, - Choice Hotel International, Inc. Roseann Thorne v. Welk Investment, Inc. William Welk Marcia Paul Choice Hotel International, Inc.
See, e.g., Delph, 130 F.3d at 358 (attorneys' fees of $88,800 in a racially hostile work environment case); Shrader v. OMC Aluminum Boat Group, Inc., 128 F.3d 1218, 1220 (8 th Cir. 1997) (attorneys' fees of $44,137.50 in an ADA case); cf. Migis v. Pearle Vision, Inc., 135 F.3d 1041, 1048 (5 th Cir. 1998) ($81,000 in attorneys' fees too high considering results obtained in Title VII case); but see Bridges v. Eastman Kodak Co., 102 F.3d 56 , 58 (2 nd Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1274 , 117 S. Ct. 2453 , 138 L.Ed.2d 211 (1997) (affirming Title VII attorneys' fees of $753,202.99).
discussed
Cited "but see"
McDannel v. Apfel
See, e.g., Delph, 130 F.3d at 358 (attorneys’ fees of $88,800 in a racially hostile work environment case); Shrader v. OMC Aluminum Boat Group, Inc., 128 F.3d 1218, 1220 (8th Cir.1997) (attorneys’ fees of $44,137.50 in an ADA case); cf. Migis v. Pearle Vision, Inc., 135 F.3d 1041, 1048 (5th Cir.1998) ($81,000 in attorneys’ fees too high considering results obtained in Title VII case); but see Bridges v. Eastman Kodak Co., 102 F.3d 56, 58 (2nd Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1274 , 117 S.Ct. 2453 , 138 L.Ed.2d 211 (1997) (affirming Title VII attorneys’ fees of $753,202.99).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Roseann Thorne v. Welk Investment
See, e.g., Delph, 130 F.3d at 358 (attorneys’ fees of $88,800 in a racially hostile work environment case); Shrader v. OMC Aluminum Boat Group, Inc., 128 F.3d 1218, 1220 (8th Cir.1997) (attorneys’ fees of $44,137.50 in an ADA case); cf. Migis v. Pearle Vision, Inc., 135 F.3d 1041, 1048 (5th Cir.1998) ($81,000 in attorneys’ fees too high considering results obtained in Title VII case); but see Bridges v. Eastman Kodak Co., 102 F.3d 56, 58 (2nd Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1274 , 117 S.Ct. 2453 , 138 L.Ed.2d 211 (1997) (affirming Title VII attorneys’ fees of $753,202.99).
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Calero-Cerezo v. United States Department of Justice
depression has been held to constitute a mental impairment.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Singh v. George Washington University
depression has been held to constitute a mental impairment.
cited
Cited "see"
Abbott v. Elwood Staffing Services Inc.
See Pritchard v. Southern Co. Services, 92 F.3d 1130 , 1135, amended in part on rehearing, 102 F.3d 1118 (11th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1274 , 117 S.Ct. 2453 , 138 L.Ed.2d 211 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Riley v. University of Alabama Health Services Foundation, P.C.
See Pritchard v. Southern Co. Services, 92 F.3d 1130 , 1135, amended in part on rehearing, 102 F.3d 1118 (11th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1274 , 117 S.Ct. 2453 , 138 L.Ed.2d 211 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Wyant v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad
See Pritchard v. Southern Co. Services, 92 F.3d 1130 , *1276 1135, amended in part on rehearing, 102 F.3d 1118 (11th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1274 , 117 S.Ct. 2453 , 138 L.Ed.2d 211 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kathleen Kline, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. City of Kansas City, Missouri, Fire Department, Appellant/cross-Appellee
See Bridges v. Eastman Kodak Co., 102 F.3d 56, 59 , 59 n. 2 (2d Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1274 , 117 S.Ct. 2453 , 138 L.Ed.2d 211 (1997); cf. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 488 F.2d 714, 717 (5th Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ott v. City of Mobile
Similarly, it is unnecessary to resolve whether the statement, even if inadmissible at trial, is admissible on motion for summary judgment under the principle that “otherwise admissible evidence [may] be submitted in inadmissible form at the summary judgment stage, though at trial it must be submitted in admissible form.” McMillian v. Johnson, 88 F.3d 1573, 1584 (11th Cir.1996), aff’d, 520 U.S. 781 , 117 S.Ct. 1734 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1 (1997); accord Pritchard v. Southern Company Services, 92 F.3d 1130 , 1135 (11th Cir.), amended on other grounds, 102 F.3d 1118 (11th Cir.1996), ce rt. denied,…
discussed
Cited "see"
McKnight v. Dormitory Authority
See Padilla v. Metro-North Commuter R.R., 92 F.3d 117 , 122 (2d Cir.1996) (bracket in original) (quoting Dominic v. Consolidated Edison Co., 822 F.2d 1249, 1254 (2d Cir.1987)), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1274 , 117 S.Ct. 2453 , 138 L.Ed.2d 211 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bilodeau v. Mega Industries
See Pritchard v. The Southern Co. Serv., 92 F.3d 1130 , 1133 (11th Cir.1996), amended in part on reh’g, 102 F.3d 118 , cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1274 , 117 S.Ct. 2453 , 138 L.Ed.2d 211 (1997); O’Neal v. Atlanta Gas and Light Co., 968 F.Supp. 721, 725 (S.D.Ga. 1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Patricia Taylor, as Guardian of Gary Taylor, a Minor v. Food World, Inc., Brunos, Inc.
See Pritchard v. Southern Co. Servs., 92 F.3d 1130 , 1132 (11th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2453 , 138 L.Ed.2d 211 (1997); see also 42 U.S.C. § 12102 (2).
cited
Cited "see"
Taylor v. Food World, Inc.
See Pritchard v. Southern Co. Servs., 92 F.3d 1130 , 1132 (11th Cir.1996), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 2453 , 138 L.Ed.2d 211 (1997); see also 42 U.S.C. § 12102 (2).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rapone, Anthony
(2×)
See Bonds v. District of Columbia, 93 F.3d 801, 804 (D.C.Cir.1996), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 2453 , 138 L.Ed.2d 211 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Local 514 Transport Workers Union v. Keating
(2×)
See also Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Co. v. State of Oklahoma ex. ret, Comm'rs of the Land Office, 83 F.3d 1219, 1229 (10⅛ Cir.1996) (citing Jane L. v. Bangerter, 61 F.3d 1493, 1497 (10th Cir.1995), cert, denied, 520 U.S. 1274 , 117 S.Ct. 2453 , 138 L.Ed.2d 211 (1997)). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Oliver v. Cole Gift Centers, Inc.
However, reinstate *116 ment may not be possible if no position is available for the plaintiff at the time of judgment, or where "the employer-employee relationship may have been irreparably damaged by animosity associated with the litigation." Id.; see also Padilla v. Metro-North Commuter R.R., 92 F.3d 117 , 125 (2d Cir.1996) (internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1274 , 117 S.Ct. 2453 , 138 L.Ed.2d 211 (1997); Kirsch v. Fleet Street, Ltd., 148 F.3d 149 (2d Cir.1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jenne v. Harris
See Steinberg v. City of Sunrise, 545 So.2d 424 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); see also Bridges v. Eastman Kodak Co., 102 F.3d 56 (2nd Cir.1996), cert. denied, Yourdon, Inc. v. Bridges, — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 2453 , 138 L.Ed.2d 211 (1997); Sharpe v. City of Lewisburg, Tenn., 677 F.Supp. 1362 (M.D.Tenn.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gunnell v. Utah Valley State College
See id. at 1033 ; see also Padilla v. Metro-North Commuter R.R., 92 F.3d 117 , 122 (2d Cir.1996) (“A plaintiff asserting a retaliation claim ‘has the ultimate burden of persuasion to demonstrate that the challenged employment decision was the result of intentional retaliation.’”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2453 , 138 L.Ed.2d 211 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kimel v. State of FL Bd. of Regents
(2×)
See Coolbaugh, 136 F.3d at 441 (Smith, J., dissenting). 44 U.S.C. § 12112 (a); see also Pritchard v. Southern Co. Services, 92 F.3d 1130 , 1132 (11th Cir.) (listing elements of prima facie ADA claim), amended on reh'g in other part, 102 F.3d 1118 (11th Cir.1996), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 2453 , 138 L.Ed.2d 211 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mary C. QUARATINO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TIFFANY & CO., Michael Eiring and David Wright, Defendants-Appellees
We also just recently reaffirmed (albeit in dicta) the holdings of Cowan and DiFilippo , consistent with the Rivera plurality, and noted that “a reasonable fee may well exceed the prevailing plaintiffs recovery.” Orchano v. Advanced Recovery, Inc., 107 F.3d 94, 98 (2d Cir.1997); see, e.g., Bridges v. Eastman Kodak Co., 102 F.3d 56 (2d Cir.1996) (upholding $753,000 fee award in Title VII case recovering $117,000 damages), cert. denied, U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2453 , 138 L.Ed.2d 211 (1997); Saulpaugh v. Monroe Community Hosp., 4 F.3d 134 (2d Cir.1993) (affirming $85,000 fee award on damage award o…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Swint
v.
Chambers County Commission
v.
Chambers County Commission
No. 96-1537.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 1997.
Published
Citer courts: District of Columbia (1)
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.