green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
13.3 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 3 distinct cases, last quoted 1998 ·
…we will not overrule our prior rulings unless a ninth circuit court of appeals decision, supreme court decision or subsequent legislation has undermined those rulings.
⚠ not in text
Topic ↗
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Smolen v. Hatley (In re Hatley)
we will not overrule our prior rulings unless a ninth circuit court of appeals decision, supreme court decision or subsequent legislation has undermined those rulings.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Hatley
we will not overrule our prior rulings unless a ninth circuit court of appeals decision, supreme court decision or subsequent legislation has undermined those rulings.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Blagg v. Miller (In Re Blagg)
(2×)
we will not overrule our prior rulings unless a ninth circuit court of appeals decision, supreme court decision or subsequent legislation has undermined those rulings.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kustom Signals, Inc. v. Applied Concepts, Inc.
See Ute Indian Tribe v. State of Utah, 114 F.3d 1513, 1522 (10th Cir.1997) (Pierce was an “extraordinary case” based on “unusual combination of events”),- cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1107 , 118 S.Ct. 1034 , 140 L.Ed.2d 101 (1998); Colo. Interstate Gas Co. v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of Am., 962 F.2d 1528 , 1535 (10th Cir.1992) (Collins controls); Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1244-45 (10th Cir.1991) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hung Duc Bui v. IBP, Inc.
The purposes of collateral estoppel are “to promote judicial economy by minimizing repetitive litigation, to prevent inconsistent judgments which undermine the integrity of the judicial system, and to provide repose by preventing a person from being harassed by vexatious litigation.” Wanamaker v. Albrecht, 99 F.3d 1151 , 1996 WL 582738 at *4 (10th Cir. Oct 10, 1996) (Table), citing People v. Santamaria, 8 Cal.4th 903 , 35 Cal.Rptr.2d 624 , 884 P.2d 81, 85 (1994); see Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation v. State of Utah, 114 F.3d 1513, 1524 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 52…
cited
Cited "see"
DeBoer v. Pennington
See Ghotra v. Bandila Shipping, Inc., 113 F.3d 1050 , 1054 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1107 , 118 S.Ct. 1034 , 140 L.Ed.2d 101 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Insurance Company of North America v. Nnr Aircargo Service (Usa), Inc., a Corporation, Opinion
See Ghotra v. Bandila Shipping, Inc., 113 F.3d 1050 , 1054 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1107 , 118 S.Ct. 1034 , 140 L.Ed.2d 101 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Silicon Graphics Inc. Securities Litigation. Edmund J. Janas v. Edward R. McCracken Michael Ramsay Robert K. Burgess Thomas J. Oswald Teruyasu Sekimoto Forest Baskett Stephen Goggiano William M. Kelly Lucille Shapiro Silicon Graphics, Inc., Deanna Brody Andrea S. Donald Israel Buck Ruth Buck Denise Struthers Thomas G. Di Cicco Ira Steven B. Ewall Rosalyn Golaine Jerry Krim Mary Anne Beke Herman Grossman Samuel J. Reiner Dennis Lucas v. Edward R. McCracken Michael Ramsay Robert K. Burgess Thomas J. Oswald Teruyasu Sekimoto Forest Baskett Stephen Goggiano William M. Kelly Lucille Shapiro Silicon Graphics, Inc.
See Ghotra v. Bandila Shipping, Inc., 113 F.3d 1050 , 1054 (9th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, __ U.S. __, 118 S. Ct. 1034 , 140 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Janas v. McCracken
See Ghotra v. Bandila Shipping, Inc., 113 F.3d 1050 , 1054 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1034 , 140 L.Ed.2d 101 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
79 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1, 74 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,720, 75 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,720, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1030, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1289 Sherrie Ann Adcock, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Chrysler Corporation, and Chrysler Credit Corporation
(2×)
See Ghotra v. Bandila Shipping, Inc., 113 F.3d 1050 , 1054 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 1034 , 140 L.Ed.2d 101 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Adcock v. Chrysler Corp.
(2×)
See Ghotra v. Bandila Shipping, Inc., 113 F.3d 1050 , 1054 (9th Cir.1997), ce rt. denied, - U.S.-, 118 S.Ct. 1034 , 140 L.Ed.2d 101 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Bianchi v. Walker
See Ghotra v. Bandila Shipping, Inc., 113 F.3d 1050 , 1054 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1034 , 140 L.Ed.2d 101 (1998); Parker v. United States, 110 F.3d 678, 681 (9th Cir.1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9019, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,635 Maurice Bianchi, F/d/b/a M. Bianchi of California, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. David M. Walker, 1 Comptroller General of the United States General Accounting Office, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association, Counter-Defendant/claimant in Interpleader-Appellee
See Ghotra v. Bandila Shipping, Inc., 113 F.3d 1050 , 1054 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 1034 , 140 L.Ed.2d 101 (1998); Parker v. United States, 110 F.3d 678, 681 (9th Cir.1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7075, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9807 Citicorp Real Estate, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Helen Smith, an Individual J.A.H., Ltd, a California Limited Partnership Stewart Title Company of San Diego, a California Corporation, Citicorp Real Estate, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Helen M. Smith, an Individual M.H.H., a California General Partnership, Citicorp Real Estate, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Helen Smith, an Individual, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant, and J.A.H., Ltd., a California Limited Partnership, and Stewart Title Company of San Diego, a California Corporation, Citicorp Real Estate, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. M. Helen Smith M.H.H., a California General Partnership
See Ghotra v. Bandila Shipping, Inc., 113 F.3d 1050 , 1054 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied by, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 1034 , 140 L.Ed.2d 101 (1998); Parker v. United States, 110 F.3d 678, 681 (9th Cir.1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Citicorp Real Estate, Inc. v. Smith
See Ghotra v. Bandila Shipping, Inc., 113 F.3d 1050 , 1054 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied by, — U.S.-, 118 S.Ct. 1034 , 140 L.Ed.2d 101 (1998); Parker v. United States, 110 F.3d 678, 681 (9th Cir.1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph v. Libretti, Jr.
See Ute Indian Tribe v. Utah, 114 F.3d 1513 , 1520 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 1034 , 140 L.Ed.2d 101 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Farmers Home Administration v. Buckner (In Re Buckner)
(2×)
Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp., 496 U.S. 384, 405 , 110 S.Ct. 2447, 2460-61 , 110 L.Ed.2d 359 (1990); accord Ute Indian Tribe v. State of Utah, 114 F.3d 1513, 1520 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 118 S.Ct. 1034 , 140 L.Ed.2d 101 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anastasiou v. M/T WORLD TRUST
See, e.g., Ghotra v. Bandila Shipping, Inc., 113 F.3d 1050 , 1059 (9th Cir.1997) (self-employed owner of business covered under LHWCA even though he did not have any employees working for him), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1107 , 118 S.Ct. 1034 , 140 L.Ed.2d 101 (1998). 7 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ameritech Corp.
v.
Raczak
v.
Raczak
No. 96-2002.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1998.
Published
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (4)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.