green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Cignetti v. Healy
See Harris v. Roderick, 126 F.3d 1189 (9th Cir.1997), ce rt. denied, 522 U.S. 1115 , 118 S.Ct. 1051 , 140 L.Ed.2d 114 (1998) (concluding that police officers who testified before a grand and petit jury were not absolutely immune for their testimony if they functioned as complaining witnesses and the allegedly false testimony was necessary to show “the full range of occasions on which [the defendants'] falsehoods were uttered''); Ireland v. Tunis, 113 F.3d 1435, 1447 (6th Cir.1997) (denying Briscoe immunity for a “complaining witness who set the wheels of government in motion by instigating…
cited
Cited "see"
Frooks v. Town of Cortlandt
See Murphy v. Lynn, 53 F.3d 547, 548 (2d Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1051 , 140 L.Ed.2d 114 (1998); Crespo v. New York City Police Commissioner, 930 F.Supp. 109, 117 (S.D.N.Y.1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Castellano v. Fragozo
(2×)
See, e.g., Murphy v. Lynn, 118 F.3d 938, 944 (2d Cir.1997) ("[I]n order to prevail on [a malicious prosecution] claim under § 1983, the plaintiff must show a violation of his rights under the Fourth Amendment".), cer t. denied, 522 U.S. 1115, 118 S.Ct. 1051 , 140 L.Ed.2d 114 (1998); see also Lambert v. Williams, 223 F.3d 257, 262 (4th Cir.2000) ("[T]here is no such thing as a ' § 1983 malicious prosecution' claim.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. Dillion
See, e.g., Murphy v. Lynn, 118 F.3d 938, 947 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1115 , 118 S.Ct. 1051 , 140 L.Ed.2d 114 (1998); Russell v. Smith, 68 F.3d 33, 36 (2d Cir.1995); Janetka v. Dabe, 892 F.2d 187, 189 (2d Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Greater New Orleans Broadcasting Ass'n v. United States
See also Valley Broadcasting Co. v. United States, 107 F.3d 1328 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1050 , 140 L.Ed.2d 114 (1998) (finding the same ban at issue here to violate the first amendment after 44 Liquormart because of the numerous exceptions).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Greater New Orleans v. United States
See also Valley Broadcasting Co. v. United States, 107 F.3d 1328 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 1050 , 140 L.Ed.2d 114 (1998) (finding the same ban at issue here to violate the first amendment after 44 Liquormart because of the numerous exceptions)
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pritchett
See, e.g., United States v. Witham, 47 M.J. 297, 300-03 (1997)(citing cases), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 118 S.Ct. 1051 , 140 L.Ed.2d 114 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Super Young Industries
v.
Pacific Employers Insurance Co.
v.
Pacific Employers Insurance Co.
No. 97-1066.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1998.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Cer-tiorari denied.