green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
10.6 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1999 ·
…in no case in this circuit have we found an adverse employment action ... without evidence that the terms, conditions, or benefits of employment were adversely affected.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Settle v. Baltimore County
(2×)
in no case in this circuit have we found an adverse employment action ... without evidence that the terms, conditions, or benefits of employment were adversely affected.
discussed
Cited "see"
Moret v. Geren
(2×)
See Munday v. Waste Mgmt. of N. Am., Inc., 126 F.3d 239 , 243 (4th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1116 , 118 S.Ct. 1053 , 140 L.Ed.2d 116 *344 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robinson v. Baltimore City Police Dept.
(2×)
See Munday v. Waste Management of N. Am., Inc., 126 F.3d 239 , 242 (4th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1116 , 118 S.Ct. 1053 , 140 L.Ed.2d 116 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chika v. Planning Research Corp.
(2×)
See Munday v. Waste Management of N. Am., Inc., 126 F.3d 239 , 242 (4th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1116 , 118 S.Ct. 1053 , 140 L.Ed.2d 116 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Brookins v. International Motor Contest Ass'n
See Corner Pocket of Sioux Falls, Inc. v. Video Lottery Techs., Inc., 123 F.3d 1107, 111-12 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1117 , 118 S.Ct. 1054 , 140 L.Ed.2d 116 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blomkest Fertilizer, Inc. v. Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan, Inc.
(2×)
See The Corner Pocket of Sioux Falls, Inc. v. Video Lottery Tech., Inc., 123 F.3d 1107, 1109 (8th Cir.1997), Cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1117 , 118 S.Ct. 1054 , 140 L.Ed.2d 116 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nichols v. Comcast Cablevision of Maryland
(2×)
See Munday v. Waste Management of North America, Inc., 126 F.3d 239, 243 (4th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1116, 118 S.Ct. 1053 , 140 L.Ed.2d 116 (1998) (defendant’s conduct did not rise to the level of an adverse employment action where there was no evidence that the terms, conditions, or benefits of the employee’s employment were adversely affected).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tammy S. Scusa v. Nestle U.S. A. Company, Inc., Doing Business as Friskies Petcare Co., Inc.
(2×)
See Munday v. Waste Management of North America, Inc., 126 F.3d 239, 243 (4th Cir.1997) (shunning of plaintiff by co-workers at direction of supervisor does not, as a matter of law, rise to the level of an adverse employment action for Title VII purposes), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1053 ,. 140 L.Ed.2d 116 (1998); see Wu v. Thomas, 996 F.2d 271 , 273 n. 3 (11th Cir.1993) (“we cannot find any case that clearly established that retaliatory harassment, as opposed to sexual or racial harassment, could violate Title VII where the employer caused the employee no tangible harm, such as lo…
discussed
Cited "see"
Tammy S. Scusa v. Nestle U.S.A. Co.
See Munday v. Waste Management of North America, Inc., 126 F.3d 239, 243 (4th Cir. 1997) (shunning of plaintiff by co-workers at direction of -18- supervisor does not, as a matter of law, rise to the level of an adverse employment action for Title VII purposes), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 1053 (1998); see Wu v. Thomas, 996 F.2d 271 , 273 n.3 (11th Cir. 1993) ("we cannot find any case that clearly established that retaliatory harassment, as opposed to sexual or racial harassment, could violate Title VII where the employer caused the employee no tangible harm, such as loss of salary, benefits or p…
discussed
Cited "see"
Pesso v. Montgomery General
See Munday v. Waste Management of N. Am., Inc., 126 F.3d 239 , 243 (4th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 1053 (1998). 3 Having affirmed the dismissal of all federal claims, we hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to exercise supple- mental jurisdiction over Pesso's state law claims. 28 U.S.C. § 1367 (c)(3); Jordahl v. Democratic Party of Va., 122 F.3d 192, 203 (4th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 856 (1998); see also United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 725-27 (1966). 6
cited
Cited "see"
Blomkest Fertilizer, Inc. v. Potash Corporation Of Saskatchewan, Inc.
See Corner Pocket of Sioux Falls, Inc. v. Video Lottery Technologies, Inc., 123 F.3d 1107, 1109 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 1054 , 140 L.Ed.2d 116 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Blomkest Fertilizer, Inc. v. Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan, Inc.
See Corner Pocket of Sioux Falls, Inc. v. Video Lottery Technologies, Inc., 123 F.3d 1107, 1109 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1054 , 140 L.Ed.2d 116 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cohen v. Abbott Laboratories
See Munday v. Waste Management of North Am., Inc., 126 F.3d 239 , 243 (4th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 1053 (1998). 7 1993, a warning for "disruptive conduct" in 1991 from her supervisors (not from Freeman), and copious notes from counselors (both female) in Abbott's Employee Assistance Program, which Cohen frequented from 1989 to 1993, repeatedly mentioning her "paranoia" about man- agement (including, but hardly limited to, Freeman) and her conflicts with numerous co-workers, both male and female, over the slightest matters.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dachman v. Shalala
(2×)
See Settle v. Baltimore County, 34 F.Supp.2d 969, 987-89 (D.Md. 1999) (discussing, inter alia, Page v. Bolger, 645 F.2d 227 (4th Cir.) (in banc), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 892 , 102 S.Ct. 388 , 70 L.Ed.2d 206 (1981), and Munday v. Waste Management of N. Am., Inc., 126 F.3d 239 , 243 (4th Cir.1997), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1053 , 140 L.Ed.2d 116 (1998)).
examined
Cited "see"
Gail Merchant Irving v. United States
(4×)
See National Union Fire Ins. v. United States, 115 F.3d 1415 , 1417-18 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1053 , 140 L.Ed.2d 116 (1998); Fisher Bros.
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Louis Parise, Jr.
(4×)
See United States v. Shifman, 124 F.3d 31, 36 (1st Cir.1997) (citation omitted), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 1053 , 140 L.Ed.2d 116 (1998). 20 It is clear that Parise Jr. participated in the conduct of the affairs of the NMU Enterprise for several years before he was given the formal title of "co-administrator" of the LSP.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Parise
See United States v. Shifman, 124 F.3d 31, 36 (1st Cir. 1997) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 1053 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Irving v. United States
See National Union Fire Ins. v. United States, 115 F.3d 1415 , 1417-18 (9th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 1053 (1998); Fisher Bros.
cited
Cited "see"
Irving v. United States
See National Union Fire Ins. v. United States, 115 F.3d 1415 , 1417-18 (9th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 1053 (1998); Fisher Bros.
discussed
Cited "see"
Toucheque v. Price Bros. Co.
(2×)
See United States v. Shifman, 124 F.3d 31, 36 (1st Cir.), petition for cert. filed, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1053 , 140 L.Ed.2d 116 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lucenti v. Potter
(2×)
See also Munday v. Waste Mgmt. of N. Am., 126 F.3d 239 (4th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1116 , 118 S.Ct. 1053 , 140 L.Ed.2d 116 (1998) (yelling at plaintiff during meeting, directing employees to ignore her and refusing to communicate with her about employment-related complaints held to be insufficient to state a hostile environment claim); Robinson v. City of Pittsburgh, 120 F.3d 1286, 1298 (3d Cir.1997) (harsh verbal reprimands insufficient to state a claim).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Manikhi v. Mass Transit Administration
(2×)
B To plead “retaliation” in violation of Title VII the plaintiff must allege that “(1) she engaged in statutorily protected expression or activity; (2) she suffered an adverse action by her employer; and (3) there is a causal link between the protected expression and the adverse action.” Knox v. Indiana, 93 F.3d 1327, 1333-34 (7th Cir.1996); see also Munday v. Waste Mgt. of N.A., Inc., 126 F.3d 239 , 242 (4th Cir.1997) (same), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1116 , 118 S.Ct. 1053 , 140 L.Ed.2d 116 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hernandez-Torres v. Intercontinental
(2×)
See Hart v. University Sys., 938 F.Supp. 104, 111 (D.N.H.1996) (holding that employee established material issue of fact as to retaliatory constructive discharge); see also Munday v. Waste Management of N. America, Inc., 126 F.3d 239 , 243 (4th Cir.1997) (explaining that constructive discharge is adverse employment action when "record discloses that it was in retaliation for the employee's exercise of rights protected by the Act"), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 1053 , 140 L.Ed.2d 116 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hernandez-Torres v. Intercontinental Trading, Inc.
(2×)
See Hart v. University Sys., 938 F.Supp. 104, 111 (D.N.H.1996) (holding that employee established material issue of fact as to retaliatory *48 constructive discharge); see also Munday v. Waste Management of N. America, Inc., 126 F.3d 239 , 243 (4th Cir.1997) (explaining that constructive discharge is adverse employment action when “record discloses that it was in retaliation for the employee’s exercise of rights protected by the Act”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1053 , 140 L.Ed.2d 116 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Commerce Bank, N. A.
v.
DiMaria Construction, Inc.
v.
DiMaria Construction, Inc.
No. 97-1085.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1998.
Published
Citer courts: D. Maryland (2)
Super. Ct. N. J., App. Div. Certiorari denied.