green
Positive treatment
published
5.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Cited for
152 L. Ed. 2d at 490 Distinguishing challenge to contract substance versus existence1 citing case
- Cardegna v. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc., 894 So. 2d 860 (Fla. 2005).publishedThe court concluded that because the plaintiffs admitted assenting to the agreements, the challenge to the legality of the underlying contract constituted a "challenge [to] the substance, rather than the existence, of the loan agreements."…
Other citing cases
- Boeing Co. v. United States, 69 Fed. Cl. 397 (Fed. Cl. 2005).published
- Lillian Pebbles Morrison v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., Mark F. Shankle, Sr. v. Pep Boys — Manny, Moe & Jack, Inc., 317 F.3d 646 (6th Cir. 2003).published
- Network Appliance, Inc. v. Bluearc Corp., 374 F. Supp. 2d 825 (N.D. Cal. 2005).published
- Daniel E. Abbey v. Anthony J. Principi, 17 Vet. App. 282 (Vet. App. 2003).published
- Fazio v. Lehman Bros., 268 F. Supp. 2d 865 (N.D. Ohio 2002).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Burden
v.
Check Into Cash of Kentucky, LLC
v.
Check Into Cash of Kentucky, LLC
01-1078.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 1, 2002.
Published opinion
535 U.S. 970
2002 U.S. LEXIS 2169
Published
BURDEN ET AL.
v.
CHECK INTO CASH OF KENTUCKY, LLC, ET AL.
No. 01-1078.
Supreme Court of the United States.
April 1, 2002.
1
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 267 F. 3d 483.