Esplanade Props., LLC v. City of Seattle, Washington, 539 U.S. 926 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Esplanade Props., LLC v. City of Seattle, Washington, 539 U.S. 926 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kellermann v. Holder (ca6, 2010-01-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Kellermann v. Holder
6th Cir. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dias v. I.N.S., 311 F.3d 456, 457-58 (1st Cir.2002), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 926 , 123 S.Ct. 2574 , 156 L.Ed.2d 603 (2003), Rankine v. Reno, 319 F.3d 93, 97-102 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 910 , 124 S.Ct. 287 , 157 L.Ed.2d 199 (2003); Chambers v. Reno, 307 F.3d 284, 290-293 (4th Cir.2002); Hernandez-Castillo v. Moore, 436 F.3d 516 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 810 , 127 S.Ct. 40 , 166 L.Ed.2d 18 (2006); Montenegro v. Ashcroft, 355 F.3d 1035, 1036-37 (7th Cir.2004) (per curiam); ArmendarizMontoya v. Sonchik, 291 F.3d 1116, 1121 (9th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 902 , 123 S.Ct…
discussed Cited "see" Sanders ex rel. Rayl v. Kansas Department of Social & Rehabilitation Services
D. Kan. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Robinson v. Kansas, 117 F.Supp.2d 1124, 1144 (D.Kan.2000), aff 'd, 295 F.3d 1183 (10th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 926 , 123 S.Ct. 2574 , 156 L.Ed.2d 603 (2002) (a prima facie case requires a plaintiff to prove: (1) he is handicapped under the Act; (2) he is “otherwise qualified” to participate in the pro gram; (3) the program receives federal financial assistance; and (4) the program discriminated against him). ‘“Qualified handicapped person'” is defined, for services other than those with respect to employment or education, as: “a handicapped person who meets the essent…
discussed Cited "see" Sanders Ex Rel. Rayl v. KANSAS DEPT. OF SOCIAL AND REHABIL. SERVICES
D. Kan. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Robinson v. Kansas, 117 F.Supp.2d 1124, 1144 (D.Kan.2000), aff'd, 295 F.3d 1183 (10th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 926 , 123 S.Ct. 2574 , 156 L.Ed.2d 603 (2002) (a prima facie case requires a plaintiff to prove: (1) he is handicapped under the Act; (2) he is "otherwise qualified" to participate in the program; *1246 (3) the program receives federal financial assistance; and (4) the program discriminated against him).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Quinones-Saucedo v. Ashcroft
9th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Dias v. INS, 311 F.3d 456, 458 (1st Cir. 2002), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 2574 , 156 L.Ed.2d 603 (2003) (applying St.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bonney v. Ashcroft
S.D.N.Y. · 2003 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Dias v. INS, 311 F.3d 456, 458 (1st Cir.2002) (per curiam), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 2574 , 156 L.Ed.2d 603 (2003) (”[A]pplication of the new [AEDPA] limitations on discretionary relief does not have an impermissible retroactive effect on those aliens who would have been eligible for discretionary relief when they were convicted of a felony after trial.”); Armendariz-Montoya v. Sonchik, 291 F.3d 1116, 1121 (9th Cir.2002) ("Unlike aliens who pleaded guilty, aliens who elected a jury trial cannot plausibly claim that they would have acted any differently had they known …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Esplanade Properties, LLC
v.
City of Seattle, Washington
02-1304.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 2003.
539 U.S. 926
Published

539 U.S. 926

Esplanade Properties, LLC
v.
City of Seattle, Washington.

No. 02-1304.

Supreme Court of United States.

June 16, 2003.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 9th Cir.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 307 F. 3d 978.