Banks v. Comm. on Unauthorized Practice of Law, 539 U.S. 927 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Banks v. Comm. on Unauthorized Practice of Law, 539 U.S. 927 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dianne Knox v. California State Employees Association (ca9, 2010-12-10)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Dianne Knox v. California State Employees Association
9th Cir. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cummings v. Connell, 316 F.3d 886, 895 (9th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 927 , 123 S.Ct. 2577 , 156 L.Ed.2d 604 (2003) (holding that the Hudson notice was designed to provide nonmembers with information necessary to evaluate whether to object to a union’s calculation of chargeable expenses); Hohe v. Casey, 956 F.2d 399, 410 (3d Cir.1992) (“the issue is wheth er the notice provided nonmembers with ... sufficient information to determine whether they were only being compelled to contribute to chargeable activities”).
discussed Cited "see" Knox v. CALIFORNIA STATE EMPLOYEES ASS'N
9th Cir. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cummings v. Connell, 316 F.3d 886, 895 (9th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 927 , 123 S.Ct. 2577 , 156 L.Ed.2d 604 (2003) (holding that the Hudson notice was designed to provide nonmembers with information necessary to evaluate whether to object to a union's calculation of chargeable expenses); Hohe v. Casey, 956 F.2d 399, 410 (3d Cir.1992) ("the issue is whether *1134 the notice provided nonmembers with. . . sufficient information to determine whether they were only being compelled to contribute to chargeable activities").
cited Cited "see" Priola v. Ashcroft
4th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ramtulla v. Ashcroft, 301 F.3d 202, 203-04 (4th Cir.2002), cert. denied, — U.S. ---, 123 S.Ct. 2577 , 156 L.Ed.2d 604 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bennett v. Mueller
C.D. Cal. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Valerio v. Crawford, 306 F.3d 742, 776 (9th Cir.2002) (en banc), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 994 , 123 S.Ct. 1788 , 155 L.Ed.2d 695 (2003) (noting that state supreme court exercised discretionary power in capital cases to overlook procedural default “in both published opinions and unpublished orders”); see also Saffold v. Carey, 312 F.3d 1031, 1034 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 927 , 123 S.Ct. 2578 , 156 L.Ed.2d 604 (2003) (considering California Supreme Court minute orders in deciding whether a state habeas petition was “pending” for purposes of statutory tolling of the limitation…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Banks
v.
Committee on Unauthorized Practice of Law
02-1490.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 2003.
539 U.S. 927
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

539 U.S. 927

Banks
v.
Committee on Unauthorized Practice of Law et al.

No. 02-1490.

Supreme Court of United States.

June 16, 2003.

1

Appeal from the Ct. App. D. C.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 805 A. 2d 990.