green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Davis
See Illinois v. Caballes, 207 Ill.2d 504 , 280 Ill.Dec. 277 , 802 N.E.2d 202 (2003), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct 1875 , 158 L.Ed.2d 466 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gonzalez-Ramirez
See Illinois v. Caballes, 207 Ill.2d 504 , 280 Ill.Dec. 277 , 802 N.E.2d 202 (2003), cert. grant ed — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 1875 , 158 L.Ed.2d 466 (Apr. 5, 2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
Muniz v. Rovira-Martino
See Rivera-Torres v. Ortiz Velez, 341 F.3d 86, 102 (1st Cir.2003), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 1875 , 158 L.Ed.2d 466 (2004); O’Connor v. Huard, 117 F.3d 12, 18 (1st Cir.1997); Braunstein v. Mass. Bank & Trust Co., 443 F.2d 1281, 1285 (1st Cir.1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
NRV Real Estate, LLC v. Virginia Department of Health
They could also occur where the agency announces a “[s]udden and unexplained change” or “does not take account of legitimate reliance on prior interpretation.” Smiley v. Citibank (S.D.), N.A., 517 U.S. 735, 742 , 116 S.Ct. 1730, 1734 , 135 L.Ed.2d 25 (1996); see also United States v. Deaton, 332 F.3d 698, 712 (4th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 972 , 124 S.Ct. 1874 , 158 L.Ed.2d 466 (2004); Boyd v. People, Inc., 43 Va.App. 82, 91 , 596 S.E.2d 100, 105 (2004) (Kelsey, J., concurring).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Adam Bros. Farming, Inc.
See also Reply at 3, citing United States v. Deaton, 332 F.3d 698 (4th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 972 , 124 S.Ct. 1874 , 158 L.Ed.2d 466 . [2] Mot. at 10, citing a February 2004 General Accounting Office report entitled "Water and Wetlands: Corps of Engineers Needs to Evaluate Its District Office Practices in Determining Jurisdiction" (GAO-04-297) (available online at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d04297.pdf). [3] Likewise, the Court concludes that any differences among district offices of the Corps regarding the impact of SWANCC are not relevant to the issue of whether the Court's Order…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Adam Bros. Farming, Inc.
See also Reply at 3, citing United States v. Deaton, 332 F.3d 698 (4th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 972 , 124 S.Ct. 1874 , 158 L.Ed.2d 466 . .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Raaflaub
v.
Grievance Administrator, Attorney Grievance Commission of Michigan
v.
Grievance Administrator, Attorney Grievance Commission of Michigan
03-8748.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 5, 2004.
Published
Sup. Ct. Mich. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until April 26, 2004, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.