green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.5 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
TradeCard, Inc. v. S1 CORP.
the district court provided a succinct and correct summary of the law of enablement that does not challenge. a trial court need not further instruct the jury on what enablement does not require.
cited
Cited "see"
NUTLEY POLICE. BENEV. v. Nutley
See Glukowsky v. Equity One, Inc., 180 N.J. 49, 64 , 848 A. 2d 747 (2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1049 , 125 S.Ct. 864 , 160 L.Ed. 2d 770 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fletcher v. Cessna Aircraft Co.
See Glukowsky v. Equity One, Inc., 180 N.J. 49, 64 , 848 A. 2d 747 (2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1049 , 125 S.Ct. 864 , 160 L.Ed. 2d 770 (2005); S & R Assocs. v. Lynn Realty Corp., 338 N.J.Super. 350, 356 , 769 A. 2d 413 (App.Div.2001); Blecker v. State, 323 N.J.Super. 434, 442 , 733 A. 2d 540 (App. *862 Div.1999); see also Miss.
cited
Cited "see"
Lavon Lamar Heath v. Asst. U.S. Attorney
See Lifestar Ambulance Service, Inc. v. United States, 365 F.3d 1293, 1295 (11th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1050 , 125 S.Ct. 866 , 160 L.Ed.2d 770 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gjl v. Akl
See Turner and Muller, 237 Or.App. 192, 197-98 , 238 P.3d 1003 (2010), rev. den., 350 Or. 231 , 253 P.3d 1080 (2011) (reviewing de novo where the trial court's express findings were limited and did not mirror the statutory factors and the appellate court could not discern how implied findings may have affected the trial court's ultimate determination); see also O'Donnell-Lamont and Lamont, 337 Or. 86, 89 , 91 P.3d 721 (2004), cert. den., 543 U.S. 1050 , 125 S.Ct. 867 , 160 L.Ed.2d 770 (2005) (noting that the trial court's findings are entitled to considerable weight).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bustamante v. Borough of Paramus
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 121 N.J. 69, 79-80 , 577 A. 2d 1239 (1990)), certif. denied, 149 N.J. 408 , 694 A. 2d 193 (1999); see also Glukowsky v. Equity One, Inc., 180 N.J. 49, 64 , 848 A. 2d 747 (2004) ("[T]he principle of comity instructs state courts to give due regard to a federal court's interpretation of a federal statute.") (citing Dewey, supra, 121 N.J. at 80 , 577 A. 2d 1239 ), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1049 , 125 S.Ct. 864 , 160 L.Ed. 2d 770 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Former Employees of Marathon Ashland Pipe Line, LLC
v.
Chao, Secretary of Labor
v.
Chao, Secretary of Labor
04-397.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 2005.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
FORMER EMPLOYEES OF MARATHON ASHLAND PIPE LINE, LLC
v.
CHAO, SECRETARY OF LABOR.
No. 04-397.
Supreme Court of United States.
January 10, 2005.
1
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 370 F. 3d 1375.