De la Rosa v. Holder, 176 L. Ed. 2d 1182 (2010). · Go Syfert
Search
De la Rosa v. Holder, 176 L. Ed. 2d 1182 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
42 citation events (42 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Elias Umana-Ramos v. Eric Holder, Jr. (ca6, 2013-07-30)
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Elias Umana-Ramos v. Eric Holder, Jr.
6th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brief for Respondent in Opposition, Contreras-Martinez v. Holder, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3274 , 176 L.Ed.2d 1182 (2010) (denying cert.), 2010 WL 1513110 , at *13.
cited Cited "see" Bobokalonov v. U.S. Attorney General
11th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See De la Rosa v. U.S. Attorney Gen., 579 F.3d 1327 , 1337 n. 14 (11th Cir.2009), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3272 , 176 L.Ed.2d 1182 (2010).
discussed Cited "see" Frederick v. Holder
7th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See De la Rosa v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 579 F.3d 1327, 1337 (11th Cir.2009), cert. de *362 nied, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3272 , 176 L.Ed.2d 1182 (2010); Koussan v. Holder, 556 F.3d 403, 412-14 (6th Cir.2009); Vue v. Gonzales, 496 F.3d 858, 861 (8th Cir.2007); Abebe v. Gonzales, 493 F.3d 1092, 1104 (9th Cir.2007); Dalombo Fontes v. Gonzales, 483 F.3d 115 (1st Cir.2007); Vo v. Gonzales, 482 F.3d 363, 368-69 (5th Cir. 2007); Caroleo v. Gonzales, 476 F.3d 158, 167-68 (3d Cir.2007).
cited Cited "see" Martoyan v. Holder
9th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Abebe v. Mukasey, 554 F.3d 1203, 1207-08 (9th Cir.2009) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3272 , 176 L.Ed.2d 1182 (2010).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Nunez-Reyes v. Holder (2×)
9th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
Federal classifications distinguishing among groups of aliens thus are valid unless wholly irrational." Garberding, 30 F.3d at 1190 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); see also Abebe v. Mukasey, 554 F.3d 1203, 1206 (9th Cir.2009) (en banc) (per curiam) ("Congress has particularly broad and sweeping powers when it comes to immigration, and is therefore entitled to an additional measure of deference when it legislates as to admission, exclusion, removal, naturalization or other matters pertaining to aliens."), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 3272 , 176 L.Ed.2d 1182 (2010).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Giorgio Foods, Inc. v. United States
Ct. Intl. Trade · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs Motion is GRANTED. 11 BACKGROUND In order to qualify for distributions under the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (“Byrd Amendment” or “CDSOA”), 2 an entity must qualify as an “affected domestic producer.” 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(a); see also SKF USA, Inc. v. U.S. Customs and Border Prot., 556 F.3d 1337 (Fed.Cir.2009), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3273 , 176 L.Ed.2d 1182 (2010); Cathedral Candle Co. v. U.S. Int’l Trade Comm’n, 400 F.3d 1352 (Fed.Cir.2005). 3 An “affected domestic producer” is defined as either a “petition…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jose Erasmo De la Rosa
v.
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General
No. 09-594.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 17, 2010.
176 L. Ed. 2d 1182
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 579 F.3d 1327.