green
Positive treatment
10.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joel Borjas-Hernandez
See United States v. Grubbs, 585 F.3d 793, 803 (4th Cir.2009), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 1923 , 176 L.Ed.2d 392 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Schmidt
See United States v. Grubbs, 585 F.3d 793, 804 (4th Cir.2009) (explaining that a departure pursuant to USSG § 5K2.0, p.s., must be based on a factor related to the offenses charged in *195 the indictment), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1923 , 176 L.Ed.2d 392 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Baucom
See United States v. Grubbs, 585 F.3d 793, 805 (4th Cir.2009) (opining that a “§ 3553(a)-based[ ] explanation of [defendant’s] sentence provides independent grounds for a variance sentence and verifies the reasonableness of the district court’s sentencing determination”), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1923 , 176 L.Ed.2d 392 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Switzer
See United States v. Grubbs, 585 F.3d 793, 805 (4th Cir.2009) (opining that a “ § 3553(a)-based[ ] explanation of [defendant’s] sentence provides independent grounds for a variance sentence and verifies the reasonableness of the district court’s sentencing determination”), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1923 , 176 L.Ed.2d 392 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. McClam
In deciding whether to depart under § 4A1.3(a)(2), the court may consider “[p]rior similar adult criminal conduct not resulting in a criminal conviction.” USSG § 4A1.3 (a)(2)(E); see United States v. Grubbs, 585 F.3d 793, 799 (4th Cir.2009), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 1923 , 176 L.Ed.2d 392 (2010).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sutton
See United States v. Grubbs, 585 F.3d 793, 799 (4th Cir.2009), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 130 S.Ct. 1923 , 176 L.Ed.2d 392 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnson
See United States v. Grubbs, 585 F.3d 793 (4th Cir.2009), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 1923 , 176 L.Ed.2d 392 (2010) (rejecting Appellant’s argument that the Fifth Amendment requires a higher standard of proof at sentencing); see also United States v. Villareal-Amarillas, 562 F.3d 892, 897 (8th Cir.2009); United States v. Jones, 489 F.3d 243, 250 (6th Cir.2007); United States v. Grier, 475 F.3d 556, 561 (3d Cir.2007); United States v. White, 472 F.3d 458, 464 (7th Cir.2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Opio Moore
See, e.g., United States v. Grubbs, 585 F.3d 793, 798-803 (4th Cir.2009) (consistent with the Fifth and Sixth Amendments, a district court may consider uncharged conduct in determining a sentence, so long as that conduct is proven by a preponderance of the evidence), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1923 , 176 L.Ed.2d 392 (2010); United States v. Powell, 650 F.3d 388, 391-93 (4th Cir.2011) (holding that the Confrontation Clause does not apply at sentencing), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 350 , 181 L.Ed.2d 220 (2011); United States v. Wilkinson, 590 F.3d 259, 269 (4th Cir.2010) (noting…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Billy Terrell Adams
v.
Arkansas
v.
Arkansas
No. 09-9076.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 22, 2010.
176 L. Ed. 2d 392
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas denied.
Same case below, 2009 Ark. 375, 326 S.W.3d 764.