green
Positive treatment
13.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Dudley Bryant, Jr. v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
See Prost v. Anderson, 636 F.3d 578, 584 (10th Cir.2011) (“The relevant metric ... is whether a petitioner’s argument challenging the legality of his detention could have been tested in an initial § 2255 motion.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1001 , 181 L.Ed.2d 733 (2012).
cited
Cited "see"
Jonathan Cruzaldovinos v. Eric Holder, Jr.
See Salem v. Holder, 647 F.3d 111, 114-15 (4th Cir.2011), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 1000 , 181 L.Ed.2d 733 (2012).
cited
Cited "see"
Lee v. Cozza-Rhodes
See Prost v. Anderson, 636 F.3d 578, 584 (10th Cir.2011), ce rt. denied, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 1001 , 181 L.Ed.2d 733 (2012).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carrasco-Chavez v. Holder
See Salem v. Holder, 647 F.3d 111 (4th Cir.2011), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1000 , 181 L.Ed.2d 733 (2012) (holding that where the relevant evidence of conviction is “in equipoise,” a petitioner has not satisfied his statutory burden to prove eligibility for relief from removal).
cited
Cited "see"
Anthony Alphonsus v. Eric Holder, Jr.
See United States v. Inzunza, 638 F.3d 1006, 1019 (9th Cir.2011), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 997 , 181 L.Ed.2d 733 (2012). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wen Zhang
See United States v. Hart, 635 F.3d 850, 858 (6th Cir.2011), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 1001 , 181 L.Ed.2d 733 (2012).
discussed
Cited "see"
Young v. Holder
See Salem v. Holder, 647 F.3d 111, 115-16 (4th Cir. 2011) (holding that an inconclusive record is insufficient to carry the alien’s burden of demonstrating eligibility for cancellation of removal), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1000 , 181 L.Ed.2d 733 (2012); Garcia v. Holder, 584 F.3d 1288, 1289-90 (10th Cir.2009) (same).
cited
Cited "see"
Dowell v. Garcia
See Prost v. Anderson, 636 F.3d 578, 588 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1001 , 181 L.Ed.2d 733 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see"
Del Raine v. Daniels
See Prost v. Anderson, 636 F.3d 578, 580 (10th Cir.2011) (if § 2255 motion could have been brought in the past, a present impediment does not render § 2255 inadequate or ineffective), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1001 , 181 L.Ed.2d 733 (2012).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Free Smith v. Derral Adams
The prosecutor’s comments on Smith’s failure to call his girlfriend and Anthony Woods as witnesses did not violate the dictate of Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 , 85 S.Ct. 1229 , 14 L.Ed.2d 106 (1965). “[A] prosecutor may properly comment upon a defendant’s failure to present witnesses so long as it is not phrased to call attention to [the] defendant’s own failure to testify.” United States v. Castillo, 866 F.2d 1071, 1083 (9th Cir.1988) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also United States v. Inzunza, 638 F.3d 1006, 1023 (9th Cir.2011), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct.…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
U.S. Vision, Inc.
v.
Debra Johnson
v.
Debra Johnson
No. 11-35.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 2012.
Cited by 10 opinions | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Same case below, 415 Fed. Appx. 841.