neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
RHOADES Et Al.
v.
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ABINGTON TOWNSHIP Et Al.
v.
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ABINGTON TOWNSHIP Et Al.
225.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1967.
Franklin C. Salisbury for appellants., William C. Bennett, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, John P. McCord, Deputy Attorney General, and Edward Friedman for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and William B. Ball for Paul et al., appellees.
Douglas.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Per Curiam.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Douglasis of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.