Smith v. Noble Drilling Corp., 390 U.S. 143 (1968). · Go Syfert
Smith v. Noble Drilling Corp., 390 U.S. 143 (1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
64 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Herman Franks, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Max Britton, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Boyce Mitchell (ca6, 1975-06-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Herman Franks, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Max Britton, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Boyce Mitchell
6th Cir. · 1975 · confidence medium
See Fed.R.Crim.P. 24(c); United States v. Cameron, 464 F.2d 333 (3rd Cir. 1972); United States v. Garafolo, 385 F.2d 200, 207-208 (7th Cir. 1967), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 390 U.S. 144 , 88 S.Ct. 841 , 19 L.Ed.2d 970 *38 (1968); United States v. Ellenbogen, 365 F.2d 982, 989 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 923 , 87 S.Ct. 892 , 17 L.Ed.2d 795 (1967).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Ayala (2×)
usarmymilrev · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
United States v. Jones, 687 F.2d 1265, 1267-1268 (8th Cir.1982); United States v. Perry, 643 F.2d 38, 53 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom Patterson v. United States, 454 U.S. 835 , 102 S.Ct. 138 , 70 L.Ed.2d 115 (1981); In re United States, 584 F.2d 666, 667 (5th Cir.1978); United States v. Wells, 437 F.2d 1144, 1146 (6th Cir.1971); Powell v. United States, 208 F.2d 618, 619 (6th Cir.1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 961 , 74 S.Ct. 710 , 98 L.Ed. 1104 (1954); see United States v. Garafolo, 385 F.2d 200, 207 (7th Cir.1967), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 390 U.S. 144 , 88 S.Ct. 841 , 19 L.Ed…
discussed Cited "see" State v. Hinojos (2×)
N.M. Ct. App. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
People v. Hall, 117 Ill.App.2d 116 , 253 N.E.2d 890 (1969) (address); State v. Hassberger, 350 So.2d 1 (Fla.1977) (name and address); see, United States v. Garafolo, 385 F.2d 200 (7th Cir. 1967), opinion vacated, 390 U.S. 144 , 88 S.Ct. 841 , 19 L.Ed.2d 970 (1968), rev’d, 396 F.2d 952 (1968) (court first held that failure of the lower court to require informer-witness to give his address at the time of trial was not error, but opinion was vacated by United States Supreme Court in light of Smith and court then reversed itself).
discussed Cited "see" Michael J. Henderson v. Michael P. Lane, Warden, Menard Correctional Center (2×)
7th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Garafolo, 385 F.2d 200 (7th Cir. 1967), vacated on other grounds, 390 U.S. 144 , 88 S.Ct. 841 , 19 L.Ed.2d 970 (1968); United States v. Houlihan, 332 F.2d 8 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 828 , 85 S.Ct. 56 , 13 L.Ed.2d 37 . 7 The petitioner’s constitutional argument is thus narrowed in its focus to the reinstatement procedures.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Luis Marti and Lou Saks (2×)
2d Cir. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Garafolo, 385 F.2d 200 (7 Cir. 1967), vacated, 390 U.S. 144 , 88 S.Ct. 841 , 19 L.Ed.2d 970 (1968), rev'd on remand, 396 F.2d 952 (7 Cir. 1968).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Sam Garafolo
7th Cir. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See 88 S.Ct. 841 .
examined Cited "see, e.g." John Kirk v. United States (4×)
7th Cir. · 1971 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. Garafolo, 385 F.2d 200, 205 (7th Cir. 1967), vacated on other grounds, 390 U.S. 144 , 88 S.Ct. 841 , 19 L.Ed.2d 970 (1968); Austin v. United States, 334 F.2d 75, 76 (6th Cir. 1964); Holmes v. United States, 323 F.2d 430, 431 (7th Cir. 1963); United States v. Shelton, 249 F.2d 871, 874 (7th Cir. 1957).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Smith
v.
Noble Drilling Corp.
648.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 29, 1968.
390 U.S. 143
Samuel C. Gainsburgh for petitioner., W. Ford Reese for respondent.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana is granted. The judgment below is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Louisiana for further consideration in light of Billiot v. Sewart Seacraft, Inc., 382 F. 2d 662 (C. A. 5th Cir. 1967), and Loffland Brothers Co. v. Huckabee, 373 F. 2d 528 (C. A. 5th Cir. 1967).