green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Pratt Central Park Limited Partnership v. Dames & Moore, Inc.
See 835 F.2d at 408 -09 6 Interestingly, Kalpakian cites a Seventh Circuit case, Eichberg & Co., Inc. v. Van Orman Fort Wayne Corp., 248 F.2d 758 (7th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 927 , 78 S.Ct. 716 , 2 L.Ed.2d 759 (1958), in which we upheld a limitation of a hotel's liability to a guest under an Indiana law similar to the Oklahoma law at issue in Kalpakian.
discussed
Cited "see"
M.B.E. Inc. v. Minority Business Opportunity Commission
See Schwebel v. Orrick, 153 F.Supp. 701, 705 (D.D.C.1957) (“it is not essential for a specification of misconduct to include the word ‘willful’ or ‘willfully’ in order to charge a willful act if knowledge and intent are implicit in the facts recited”), aff'd, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 210 , 251 F.2d 919 (per curiam), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 927 , 78 S.Ct. 716 , 2 L.Ed.2d 759 (1958).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bradford
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 829.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 7, 1958.
Petitioner pro se., Solicitor General Rankin and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.