green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
8.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 46 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Temengil v. Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands
But see Pauling v. McElroy, 164 F.Supp. 390, 393 (D.D.C. 1958), aff'd 278 F.2d 252 , 254 n.3 (D.C.Cir. 1960) cert.denied 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 61 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960)(indicating that the Constitution does not protect Micronesian "non-resident aliens").
discussed
Cited "but see"
Commonwealth v. Atalig
But see Pauling v. McElroy, 164 F.Supp. 390, 393 (D.D.C. 1958), aff'd 278 F.2d 252 , 254 n.3 (D.C.Cir. 1960) cert. denied 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 61 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960)(indi-cating that the Constitution does not protect Micronesian "non-resident aliens").
cited
Cited "but see"
Mister Ralpho v. J. Raymond Bell, Chairman, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States
But see Pauling v. McElroy, 164 F.Supp. 390, 393 (D.D.C.1958), aff’d, 107 U.S.App.D.C. 372 , 278 F.2d 252 , cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 61 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Lo Bosco v. Kure Engineering Ltd.
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Id. at 87.
discussed
Cited "see"
Arnold v. District of Columbia
“However, legal conclusions, deductions or opinions couched, as factual allegations are not given a presumption of truthfulness.” 2A Moore’s Federal Practice and Procedure § 12.07 (2d ed.1986) (footnote omitted); see Haynesworth v. Miller, 820 F.2d 1245, 1254 (D.C.Cir.1987) (citing Pauling v. McElroy, 278 F.2d 252, 254 (D.C.Cir.1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81, S.Ct. 61, 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johns Hopkins University v. CellPro
Cooper Distributing Co. v. Amana Refrigeration, 63 F.3d 262 (3d Cir.1995); see general *313 ly Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 90 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Clinton
“However, legal conclusions, deductions or opinions couched as factual allegations are not given a presumption of truthfulness.” 2A Moore’s Federal Practice, § 12.07, at 63 (2d ed. 1986) (footnote omitted); see Haynesworth v. Miller, 820 F.2d 1245, 1254 (D.C.Cir.1987) (citing Pauling v. McElroy, 278 F.2d 252, 254 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 61 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Webb v. District of Columbia
“However, legal conclusions, deductions or *180 opinions couched as factual allegations are not given a presumption of truthfulness.” 2A Moore’s Federal Practice, § 12.07, at 63 (2d ed. 1986) (footnote omitted); see Haynesworth v. Miller, 820 F.2d 1245, 1254 (D.C.Cir.1987) (citing Pauling v. McElroy, 278 F.2d 252, 254 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 61 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (I960)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wiggins v. District Cablevision, Inc.
“However, legal conclusions, deductions or opinions couched as factual allegations are not given a presumption of truthfulness.” 2A Moore’s Federal Practice, § 12.07, at 63 (2d ed. 1986) (footnote omitted); see Haynesworth v. Miller, 820 F.2d 1245, 1254 (D.C.Cir.1987) (citing Pauling v. McElroy, 278 F.2d 252, 254 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 61 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wiggins v. Hitchens
"However, legal conclusions, deductions or opinions couched as factual allegations are not given a presumption of truthfulness.” 2A Moore’s Federal Practice, § 12.07, at 63 (2d ed. 1986) (footnote omitted); see Haynesworth v. Miller, 820 F.2d 1245, 1254 (D.C.Cir.1987) (citing Pauling v. McElroy, 278 F.2d 252, 254 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 61 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wiggins v. Philip Morris, Inc.
"However, legal conclusions, deductions or opinions couched as factual allegations are not given a presumption of truthfulness.” 2A Moore’s Federal Practice, § 12.07, at 63 (2d ed. 1986) (footnote omitted); see Haynesworth v. Miller, 820 F.2d 1245, 1254 (D.C.Cir.1987) (citing Pauling v. McElroy, 278 F.2d 252, 254 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 61 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wiggins v. Philip Morris, Inc.
“However, legal conclusions, deductions or opinions couched as factual allegations are not given a presumption of truthfulness.” 2A Moore’s Federal Practice, § 12.07, at 63 (2d ed. 1986) (footnote omitted); see Haynesworth v. Miller, 820 F.2d 1245, 1254 (D.C.Cir.1987) (citing Pauling v. McElroy, 278 F.2d 252, 254 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 61 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Price v. Kelly
“However, legal conclusions, deductions or opinions couched as factual allegations are not given a presumption of truthfulness.” 2A Moore’s Federal Practice, § 12.07, at 63 (2d ed. 1986) (footnote omitted); see Haynesworth v. Miller, 820 F.2d 1245, 1254 (D.C.Cir.1987) (citing Pauling v. McElroy, 278 F.2d 252, 254 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 61 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Boggs v. Bowron
“However, legal conclusions, deductions or opinions couched as factual allegations are not given a presumption of truthfulness.” 2A Moore’s Federal Practice, § 12.07, at 63 (2d ed. 1986) (footnote omitted); see Haynes-worth v. Miller, 820 F.2d 1245, 1254 (D.C.Cir.1987) (citing Pauling v. McElroy, 278 F.2d 252, 254 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835, 81 S.Ct. 61 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960)).
cited
Cited "see"
Jane Klein and Douglas Klein, Her Husband v. John S. Hollings Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. Tennessee Kartage, Inc. Ryder Temperature Control Carrier, Inc. John S. Hollings Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. And Tennessee Kartage, Inc. A/K/A Ryder Temperature Control Carriage, Jane Klein and Douglas Klein, Her Husband v. John S. Hollings Ryder Temperature Control Carrier, Inc. John S. Hollings Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. And Tennessee Kartage, Inc. A/K/A Ryder Temperature Control Carriage
See Lind v. Schenley Indus., Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 90 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
cited
Cited "see"
Klein v. Hollings
See Lind v. Schenley Indus., Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 90 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
cited
Cited "see"
Maylie v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
See Lind v. Schenley Industries, 278 F.2d 79, 90 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Finkelstein v. District of Columbia
(2×)
See Rich v. District of Columbia, 410 A.2d 528, 535-36 (D.C. 1979) (citing Taylor v. Washington Terminal Co., 133 U.S.App.D.C. 110 , 113, 409 F.2d 145, 148 , cert. denied, 396 U.S. 835 , 90 S.Ct. 93 , 24 L.Ed.2d 85 (1969), and Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 90 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960)); see also Brun-Jacobo v. Pan Am.
discussed
Cited "see"
Grenz v. Kelsch
See 5A Moore's Federal Practice, ¶ 49.03[4] (1987). [2] Kelsch urges this court to adopt a standard of review requiring "close scrutiny" for orders granting a new trial on the grounds the verdict is contrary to the weight of evidence than for orders granting a new trial on other grounds, as set forth in Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 90 (3 Cir.1960), cert. denied 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
cited
Cited "see"
The Association of the Bar of the City of New York v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Dulles v. Johnson, 273 F.2d 362, 367 (2d Cir.1959), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 834 , 81 S.Ct. 54 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
cited
Cited "see"
Roebuck, Dr. James R. v. Drexel University
See Lind v. Schenley Industries, 278 F.2d 79, 90 (3d Cir.) (in banc), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960). 36 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Temistocles Ramirez De Arellano v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Defense
(2×)
See Pauling v. McElroy, 278 F.2d 252 , 254 n. 3 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 61 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960); L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Temistocles Ramirez De Arellano v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Defense
(2×)
See Pauling v. McElroy, 278 F.2d 252 , 254 n. 3 (D.C.Cir.1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 61 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960); L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hanoch Tel-Oren, in His Capacity as Father, on Behalf of the Deceased, Imry Tel-Oren v. Libyan Arab Republic Hanoch Tel-Oren v. Libyan Arab Republic
(2×)
See Pauling v. McElroy, 164 F.Supp. 390, 393 (D.D.C.1958), aff'd, 278 F.2d 252 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 61 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960); Dreyfus v. Von Finck, 534 F.2d at 30 ; People of Saipan v. Department of Interior, 502 F.2d 90, 100-03 (9th Cir.1974) (Trask, J., concurring), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 1003 , 95 S.Ct. 1445 , 43 L.Ed.2d 761 (1975); Sei Fujii v. State, 38 Cal.2d 718 , 242 P.2d 617 (1952). 148 The Hague Conventions similarly cannot be construed to afford individuals the right to judicial enforcement.
discussed
Cited "see"
Marion v. Coffran v. Hitchcock Clinic, Inc.
See Borras, 586 F.2d at 887 , quoting Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 90 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960). 1 Applying these stan *7 dards after a careful review of the record, we are constrained to conclude that the district court erred in granting plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial, and that the jury’s verdict in favor of the defendant Clinic must be reinstated.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jolane Russell v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
See Vander Zee v. Karabatsos, 589 F.2d 723 (D.C.Cir.1978) and the cases cited therein, particularly Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79 , cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
cited
Cited "see"
Schreffler v. Board of Education of Delmar School District
See Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 90 (C.A.3) (en banc), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
cited
Cited "see"
Kerry Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers of America
See Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79 (3rd Cir.), cert, denied 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Estate of David Smith, Deceased v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
(2×)
E.g., Ballance v. United States, 347 F.2d 419, 423 (7th Cir. 1965); Commercial National Bank v. United States, 196 F.2d 182, 185 (4th Cir. 1952); Estate of Louis Sternberger, 18 T.C. 836 , 843 (1952), aff'd, 207 F.2d 600 (2d Cir. 1953), rev'd on other grounds, 348 U.S. 187 , 75 S.Ct. 229 , 99 L.Ed. 246 (1955); see Dulles v. Johnson, 273 F.2d 362 , 369--370 (2d Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 834 , 81 S.Ct. 54 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960). 16 The majority opinion not only ignores Park but the Code as well, focusing instead upon Treasury Regulation § 20.2053--3(d)(2), which provides deductions from…
discussed
Cited "see"
Lawrence B. Thomas, and Cross-Appellant v. E. J. Korvette, Inc., and Cross-Appellee
(2×)
Gatenby v. Altoona Aviation Corp., 407 F.2d 443, 446 (3d Cir. 1968); see Lind v. Schenely Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 84 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gatenby v. Altoona Aviation Corporation
See Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 84 (3rd Cir.), cert. den. 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960); Denneny v. Siegel et al., 407 F. 2d 433 , (3rd Cir. 1969), and cases there cited.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gatenby v. Altoona Aviation Corp.
See Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 84 (3rd Cir.), cert. den. 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960); Denneny v. Siegel et al., 407 F.2d 433 , (3rd Cir. 1969), and cases there cited.
discussed
Cited "see"
Neely v. Martin K. Eby Construction Co., Inc.
See Lind v. Schenley Indus., Inc., 278 F.2d 79 (C.A.3d Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 ; Moist Cold Refrigerator Co. v. Lou Johnson Co., 249 F.2d 246 (C.A.9th Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 968 , 78 S.Ct. 1008 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 ; Bailey v. Slentz, 189 F.2d 406 (C.A.10th Cir. 1951).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alverta Livergood and Omer Livergood, Her Husband, in Their Own Right, and on Behalf of Roy Livergood v. S. J. Groves & Sons Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. Charles Livergood, Third-Party
See Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 88 (C.A.3, 1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 . 72 If defendant's contention is to have any validity here, then any jury verdict in a serious bodily injury case where the testimony is conflicting would be violable.
cited
Cited "see"
Livergood v. S. J. Groves & Sons Co.
See Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 88 (C.A.3, 1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Edna M. Bennett v. D.C. Transit System, Inc.
(2×)
See Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 87-91 (3rd Cir., 1960), cert. denied 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 78 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 , wehre, following a thorough discussion, the opinion states in part: 12 'But where no undesirable or pernicious element has occurred or been introduced into the trial and the trial judge nonetheless grants a new trial on the ground that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence, the trial judge in negating the jury's verdict has, to some extent at jury's verdict has, to some extent at the facts and the credibility of the witnesses for that of thejury.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Menard, Inc. v. Dage-MTI, Inc.
(2×)
See also Lind v. Schenley Indus., Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 85 (3d Cir.) ("In many cases the same facts will support a finding of `apparent' or `inherent agency.'"), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960). [2] There are at least two relevant sections of the Restatement (Second) of Agency, which define the scope and extent of inherent authority as it relates to the facts of this case: § 8A (entitled, "Inherent Agency Power"), and § 161 (entitled, "Unauthorized Acts of General Agent"). [3] The Restatement explains, The rule in this Section ... [is an] important illustration[ ]…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Younis Bros. & Co. v. Cigna Worldwide Insurance
Co., 802 F.2d 667, 671 (3d Cir.1986); see also Lind v. Schenley Indus., Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 84 (3d Cir.1960) (in a diversity case the division of functions between the court and the jury is controlled by federal law), cert. denied, Schenley Indus., Inc. v. Lind, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Craft v. Metromedia, Inc.
See also Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co. v. Aalco Wrecking Co., 466 F.2d 179, 187 (8th Cir.1972) (court may order new trial if first trial resulted in a miscarriage of justice), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 930 , 93 S.Ct. 1371 , 35 L.Ed.2d 592 (1973). “[W]here the trial court finds the verdict contrary to the weight of the evidence and grants a new trial ... the appellate court should ‘exercise a closer degree of scrutiny and supervision ... in order to protect the litigants’ right to jury trial.’ ” Id., 466 F.2d at 187 (quoting Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 90 (3rd Cir.),…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Duane Keeler v. David Hewitt
Compare Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 90-91 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
A. A. Spurlin, Surviving Parent of Douglas J. Spurlin, a Minor, Deceased v. General Motors Corporation
See, e. g, Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960); Cities Service Oil Co. v. Launey, 403 F.2d 537 (5th Cir. 1968); Duncan v. Duncan, 377 F.2d 49, 52-55 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 913 , 88 S.Ct. 239 , 19 L.Ed.2d 260 (1967); Fireman’s Fund Ins.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William J. Dawson
Compare Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 88 (3 Cir. in banc), cert, denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Concrete Institute v. State Tax Commission
Compare Dulles v. Johnson (CA 2, 1959), 273 F2d 362 (80 ALR2d 1338), certiorari denied (1960), 364 US 834 ( 81 S Ct 54 , 5 L Ed 2d 60 ), and American Society for Testing and Materials v. Board of Revision of Taxes (1967), 423 Pa 530 ( 225 A2d 557 ), where the record showed that the organizations which there succeeded in obtaining exemption made a continuing contribution, including during the tax years before the court, in fields of endeavor where, but for that contribution, government would have had to step in and do the job that was being done by the organization in question.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barnett v. Anaconda Company
But causation is a question of ultimate fact, and a conclusory allegation on this subject need not be accepted when in irreconcilable conflict with the evidentiary facts alleged in the complaint. 1A Barron & Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure § 350 at 330-31 (Rules ed. Wright 1960); see, e. g., Pauling v. McElroy, 107 U.S.App.D.C. 372 , 278 F. 2d 252 (per curiam), cert. den., 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 61 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960); Hess v. Petrillo, 259 F.2d 735 (7 Cir. 1958), cert. den., 359 U.S. 954 , 79 S.Ct. 743 , 3 L.Ed.2d 761 (1959); Ryan v. Scoggin, 245 F.2d 54 (10 Cir. 1957); Sexton v.…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Down Town Association of the City of New York
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 208.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1960.
Timothy N. Pfeiffer and Rebecca M. Cutler for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, L. W. Post and Louise Foster for the United States.
Application, Consideration, Took.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.