green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.9 score
“horsley ii”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Shugart
S.Ct. 136, 62 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979) (officer was not required to comply with federal “knock and announce” statute when he entered the defendant’s garage after other officers had entered the defendant’s residence, because garage was open and the officer’s entry did not amount to a “breaking” within the meaning of the statute); United States v. McClard, 333 F.Supp. 158, 167-68 (E.D.Ark.1971), aff 'd, 462 F.2d 488 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 988 , 93 S.Ct. 345 , 34 L.Ed.2d 255 (1972) (officer’s violation of “knock and announce” rule at defendant’s residence did not taint unannounce…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Afanador
(2×)
See United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 1361 (rejecting vagueness challenge concerning phrase “organizer, a supervisory position, or any other position of management” in 21 U.S.C.A. § 848 , and noting that “the words encompassed within the phrases * * * enjoy a wide currency in the business community and are commonly understood by members of the public,” id. at 1368 ), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 865 , 100 S.Ct. 136 , 62 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979); and Williams v. State, 329 Md. 1 , 616 A.2d 1275 (1992) (holding that terms “organizer, supervisor, financier or manager” used in Maryland statute…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Donaciano Hernandez-Escarsega
See id. at 526 (citing United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 1361, 1367 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 865 , 100 S.Ct. 136 , 62 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979)); see also United States v. Young, 745 F.2d 733, 747 (2d Cir.1984) *1571 (collecting cases), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1842 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alvin Frazin, United States of America v. Ronald Mark Miller
See United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 1361, 1365 (9th Cir.) (when officers announce at the front door of a house, they are not required to announce at the entry to the garage), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 865 , 100 S.Ct. 136 , 62 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979); United States v. Bustamante-Gamez, 488 F.2d 4, 9-10 (9th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 970 , 94 S.Ct. 1993 , 40 L.Ed.2d 559 (1974). 7 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Zavala
Accord, United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 1361, 1367 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 865 , 100 S.Ct. 136 , 62 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eugene C. Kirk
See United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 1361, 1364 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 865 , 100 S.Ct. 136 , 62 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979); United States v. Michel, 588 F.2d 986, 1000-1001 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 825 , 100 S.Ct. 47 , 62 L.Ed.2d 32 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jay Kenton Samuelson, United States of America v. Danny Gene Hoffarth
See United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 1361, 1364 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 865 , 100 S.Ct. 136 , 62 L.Ed.2d 88 (1977); United States v. Michel, 588 F.2d 986, 1000-01 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 825 , 100 S.Ct. 47 , 62 L.Ed.2d 32 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stephen Federico
(2×)
See United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 1361 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 865 , 100 S.Ct. 136 , 62 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul Mannino
See United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 1361, 1367-68 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 865 , 100 S.Ct. 136 , 62 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Tocco
See e.g., United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 1361 (9th Circuit), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 865 , 100 S.Ct. 136 , 62 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979); United States v. Bergdoll, 412 F.Supp. 1308 (D.Del.1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tanya Mann
United States v. Barnett, 667 F.2d 835, 841 (9th Cir.1982) (citing United States v. Provenzano, 334 F.2d 678, 691 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 947 , 85 S.Ct. 440 , 13 L.Ed.2d 544 (1964)); see also United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 1361 , 1363 n. 2 (9th Cir.) (one can aid and abet an unindicted principal), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 865 , 100 S.Ct. 136 , 62 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Walter R. Webster, A/K/A Gangster, A/K/A Mr. G, United States of America v. Walter R. Webster, A/K/A Gangster A/K/A Mr. G. A/K/A G, United States of America v. Richard Adams, A/K/A Mr. Richard, United States of America v. Norma Thompson, United States of America v. Boysie Ash, United States of America v. Victoria Wills, United States of America v. John v. Christian, A/K/A Wolf, United States of America v. Herbert Leon Johnson, A/K/A Herb
See, e. g., United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 1361, 1368 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 865 , 100 S.Ct. 136 , 62 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979) ("Finally, we see no fatal vagueness problem in the requirement that a criminal enterprise defendant must have received 'substantial income or resources' from his or her activity.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Webster
See, e. g., United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 1361, 1368 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 865 , 100 S.Ct. 136 , 62 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979) (“Finally, we see no fatal vagueness problem in the requirement that a criminal enterprise defendant must have received ‘substantial income or resources’ from his or her activity.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hackett
v.
Hackett
v.
Hackett
No. 79-35.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1979.
Published
Citer courts: D. New Jersey (1)
Ct. App. N. C. Certiorari denied.