green
Positive treatment
6.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Bloomfield Financial Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. National Home Life Assurance Company, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
But cf. Photovest Corp. v. Fotomat Corp., 606 F.2d 704, 729-30 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 1278 , 63 L.Ed.2d 601 (1980) (court awarded punitive damages to a franchisee for multiple, oppressive, and intentional breaches when evidence showed that defendant sought to ruin plaintiff’s business and thereby force plaintiff to resell its franchises to the franchisor at a reduced rate).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Rosenberg v. Pillsbury Co.
In that case, the defendant franchisor opened its own stores to compete directly with the plaintiff franchisee, in order to “destroy plaintiff’s business and to recover the franchise for itself.” Id. at 728.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Harold W. Prow v. Medtronic, Inc.
The district court found that even assuming arguendo Medtronic’s actions were inequitable, such misconduct must bear some relation to the merits of the case, see Mitchell Brothers Film Group v. Cinema Adult Theater, 604 F.2d 852, 863-65 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 1277 , 63 L.Ed.2d 601 *122 (1980), and that no such relationship was established here.
discussed
Cited "see"
International Motor Contest Ass'n, Inc. v. Staley
See id. (requiring wrongdoing of “serious proportions” that is “directly related to the equities between the parties” to sustain an “unclean hands” defense to copyright infringement).
cited
Cited "see"
Vylene Enterprises, Inc. v. Naugles, Inc. (In Re Vylene Enterprises, Inc.)
See Photovest Corp. v. Fotomat Corp., 606 F.2d 704, 714-719 (7th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 445 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 1278 , 63 L.Ed.2d 601 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Darrell Murphy, Cross-Appellees v. Business Cards Tomorrow, Inc., and Itek Corporation, Cross-Apellants. Darrell Murphy v. Business Cards Tomorrow, Inc.
See Photovest Corp. v. Fotomat Corp., 606 F.2d 704, 723 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 1278 , 63 L.Ed.2d 601 (1980) 2 These two franchisees operated in Chicago, outside the area in which plaintiffs do business.
cited
Cited "see"
Murphy v. Business Cards Tomorrow, Inc.
See Photovest Corp. v. Fotomat Corp., 606 F.2d 704, 723 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 1278 , 63 L.Ed.2d 601 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see"
G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch Inc.
(2×)
See Photovest Corporation v. Fotomat Corporation, 606 F.2d 704, 711-13 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 1278 , 63 L.Ed.2d 601 (1980); United States v. Empire Gas Corporation, 537 F.2d 296, 302 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1122 , 97 S.Ct. 1158 , 51 L.Ed.2d (1977); Bernard Food Industries, Inc. v. Dietene Company, 415 F.2d 1279, 1284 (7th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 912 , 90 S.Ct. 911 , 25 L.Ed.2d 92 (1970). 71.
discussed
Cited "see"
Al Vaughn, Marjorie Vaughn, Algon Corporation and Springfield Drive-Ins, Inc. v. General Foods Corporation and Burger Chef Systems, Inc.
Reliance has been deemed justifiable where all of the material facts were “exclusively within the knowledge of [the sellers], and the purchasers had no means of independently ascertaining the truth.” Whiteco Properties, 467 N.E.2d at 437 ; see Photovest Corp. v. Fotomat Corp., 606 F.2d 704 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 1278 , 63 L.Ed.2d 601 (1981); Plymale, 419 N.E.2d at 762 .
cited
Cited "see"
Vylene Enterprises, Inc. v. Naugles, Inc. (In Re Vylene Enterprises, Inc.)
See Photovest Corp. v. Fotomat Corp., 606 F.2d 704, 714-719 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 1278 , 63 L.Ed.2d 601 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
The Domed Stadium Hotel, Inc., D/B/A Holiday Inn-Superdome v. Holiday Inns, Inc.
See Photovest Corp. v. Fotomat Corp., 606 F.2d 704, 726-27 (7th Cir.1979) cert. denied, 445 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 1278 , 63 L.Ed.2d 601 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gary Crossland, Cross-Appellants v. Canteen Corporation, Cross-Appellee
See Photovest Corp. v. Fotomat Corp., 606 F.2d 704, 723-24 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 1278 , 63 L.Ed.2d 601 (1980) (franchisor’s false representations that its prices were lower than competitors’ did not establish a tie because no use of economic power to coerce purchase). 6 .
cited
Cited "see"
Clovis Carl Green, Jr. v. Warden, U.S. Penitentiary
See Photovest Corp. v. Fotomat Corp., 606 F.2d 704 , 711 n. 5 (7th Cir.1979), certiorari denied, 445 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 1278 , 63 L.Ed.2d 601 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
King v. Edwards
See Mitchell Brothers Film Group v. Cinema Adult Theater, 604 F.2d 852 (5th Cir. 1979) cert. denied 445 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 1277 , 63 L.Ed.2d 601 ; Bertoglio v. Texas International Company, 488 F.Supp. 630 (D.Del.1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America Ex Rel. Monty Powell v. James Irving
See Martinez v. California, 444 U.S. 277 , 285 n.11, 100 S.Ct. 553, 559 , 62 L.Ed.2d 481 , rehearing denied, 445 U.S. 920 , 100 S.Ct. 1285 , 63 L.Ed.2d 601 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bell v. Cherokee Aviation Corp.
(2×)
See Photo-vest Corp. v. Fotomat Corp., 606 F.2d 704, 721-25 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 1278 , 63 L.Ed.2d 601 (1980) (express language in contract creates prima-facie tie-in ease despite fact that plaintiff desired the tie-in); Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 561 F.2d 434, 449 (3d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 (1978) (“once a plaintiff proves that a defendant has conditioned the sale of one product upon the purchase of another, there is no requirement that he prove that his purchase was coerced by the seller’s requirement.�…
discussed
Cited "see"
Bell v. Cherokee Aviation Corporation
(2×)
See Photovest Corp. v. Fotomat Corp., 606 F.2d 704, 721-25 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 1278 , 63 L.Ed.2d 601 (1980) (express language in contract creates prima-facie tie-in case despite fact that plaintiff desired the tie-in); Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 561 F.2d 434, 449 (3d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 (1978) ("once a plaintiff proves that a defendant has conditioned the sale of one product upon the purchase of another, there is no requirement that he prove that his purchase was coerced by the seller's requirement."); Mo…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Emigra Group, LLC v. Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy, LLP
See, e.g., Photovest Corp. v. Potomat Corp., 606 F.2d 704, 713 (7th Cir.1979) ("[o]ne of the most important indicia suggested in Brown Shoe is whether drive-thru photo processing is offered at prices distinct from other methods of photo processing”), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 1278 , 63 L.Ed.2d 601 (1980). 116 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. v. Smith
(2×)
See also Photovest Corp. v. Fotomat Corp., 606 F.2d 704, 721-25 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 1278 , 63 L.Ed.2d 601 (1980), cited by the Bell court for this proposition that the illegality of a tie-in is its wrongful restraint in the marketplace of the buyer’s freedom “to take either product by itself,” Northern Pacific R.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
AgMax, Inc. v. Countrymark Cooperative, Inc.
Ass’n, 720 F.Supp. 1363, 1378 (S.D.Ind.1989), aff'd, 908 F.2d 200 (7th Cir.1990); see also Photovest Corp. v. Fotomat Corp., 606 F.2d 704 , 721 n. 27 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 1278 , 63 L.Ed.2d 601 (1980); BeerMart, Inc. v. Strok Brewery Co., 633 F.Supp. 1089, 1105 (N.D.Ind.), rev’d on other grounds, 804 F.2d 409 (7th Cir.1986). 7 The injunctive relief sought by the plaintiff is in essence an order requiring Coun-trymark to continue to supply AgMax with fuel and petroleum products as it has in the past.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Southwestern Bell Media, Inc. v. Trans Western Publishing, Inc.
See, e.g., Mitchell Brothers Film Group v. Cinema Adult Theater, 604 F.2d 852, 863 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 1277 , 63 L.Ed.2d 601 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Matter of X-Cel, Inc., D/B/A Sizzler Family Steak House, Debtor-Appellant
See, e.g., Photovest Corp. v. Fotomat Corp., 606 F.2d 704, 731 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 1278 , 63 L.Ed.2d 601 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The MacHlett Laboratories, Inc. v. Techny Industries, Inc., C. William Vatz, Leonard Bezark, Jr., and James R. Craig
(2×)
Luke’s Medical Center, 660 F.2d 1217 at 1220 (7th Cir. 1981); see also Photovest Corp. v. Fotomat Corp., 606 F.2d 704, 731 (7th Cir. 1979), certiorari denied, 445 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 1278 , 63 L.Ed.2d 601 . 4 For the following reasons, we con-elude that the district court abused its discretion by granting this preliminary injunction.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Broadway Delivery Corp. v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
Compare Columbia Metal Culvert Co., Inc. v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp., 579 F.2d 20 , 33-34 & n.49 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 876 , 99 S.Ct. 214 , 58 L.Ed.2d 190 (1978) (issue of law), and H & B Equipment Co., Inc. v. International Harvester Co., 577 F.2d 239, 244-45 (5th Cir. 1978) (same), with Photovest Corp. v. Fotomat Corp., 606 F.2d 704, 726-27 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 1278 , 63 L.Ed.2d 601 (1980) (issue of fact), Ogilvie v. Fotomat Corp., 641 F.2d 581 , 1980-81 Trade Cases (CCH) ¶ 63,817 (8th Cir. 1981) (same), and Las Vegas Sun, Inc. v. Summa…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Juneau Square Corp. v. First Wisconsin National Bank of Milwaukee
It is well-established that the elements of a Sherman Act section two monopoly offense are “(1) the possession of monopoly power in the relevant market and (2) the willful acquisition or maintenance of that power as distinguished from growth or development as a consequence of a superior product, business acumen, or historic accident.” United States v. Grinnell Corp., 384 U.S. 563, 570 , 86 S.Ct. 1698, 1704 , 16 L.Ed.2d 778 (1966); see also Photovest Corp. v. Fotomat Corp., 606 F.2d 704, 711 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 1278 , 63 L.Ed.2d 601 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bora
v.
Mitchell Brothers Film Group
v.
Mitchell Brothers Film Group
No. 79-1088.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 3, 1980.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.