green
Positive treatment
5.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Rexach Benítez
See United States v. Lichenstein, 610 F.2d 1272 , 1281 & n.4 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed. 2d 856 (1980) ....
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael David Winter, and Aetna Life & Casualty Insurance Co., Intervenor-Appellant v. Brenner Tank, Inc. And Bar-Bel Fabricating Co., Inc.
See United States v. Lichenstein, 610 F.2d 1272, 1281 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, Bella v. United States, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980); see also Dixon 754 F.2d at 585-86 (“To justify a reversal based on improper comments of counsel, the conduct must be such as to gravely impair the calm and dispassionate consideration of the case by the jury.”) Though the questions propounded by the defense counsel were certainly improper, we cannot hold that they so permeated the proceedings such as to deny Winter’s right to a fair trial.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gabriel De Jesus Cardenas
See United States v. Lichenstein, 610 F.2d 1272, 1282 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alan Louis Chavis and Lambert Daniel Slisz
See United States v. Lichenstein, 610 F.2d 1272, 1277-78 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John R. Swaim
See United States v. Lichenstein, 610 F.2d 1272, 1278 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980). 16 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wendell Cole, Howard Masters, B.K. Taylor, Larry Masters, Defendants
See United States v. Nickerson, 669 F.2d 1016, 1020 (5th Cir. Unit B 1982) (citing United States v. Lichenstein, 610 F.2d 1272 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Floyd H. Plueckhahn v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
See Blackburn v. Crum & Forster, 611 F.2d 102, 104 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 906 , 100 S.Ct. 2989 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 *246 (1980); 8 Copperweld, — U.S. at —, 104 S.Ct. at 2742 (foreclosing section 1 liability entirely since parent and wholly-owned subsidiary, by necessity, have complete unity of interest); Hood, 739 F.2d at 1015 (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Francis P. Tracey v. United States
See United States v. Lichenstein, 610 F.2d 1272 , 1281 & n. 4 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980); United States v. Union Nacional de Trabajadores, 576 F.2d 388, 395 (1st Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
27 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1352, 28 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,413 Placido Rivera, Richard Gonzales, Intervenors-Appellants v. The City of Wichita Falls
See Eubanks v. Pickens-Bond Construction Co., 635 F.2d 1341, 1347 (8th Cir. 1980); accord Hamilton v. General Motors Corp., 606 F.2d 576, 580 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2990 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pedro Saade, United States of America v. Carlos Zenon Rodriguez
(2×)
See United States v. Lichenstein, 610 F.2d 1272 , 1281 & n.4 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980); United States v. Union Nacional de Trabajadores, 576 F.2d 388, 395 (1st Cir. 1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Terry Bottom, Dave Davis and Elam Bracy Hamilton
See United States v. Lichenstein, 610 F.2d 1272, 1279 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frank E. Basil, Inc. v. Guardino
Purposefulness, in turn, depends upon two factors: (1) whether the defendant “anticipated that [it] would derive any economic benefits as a result of the contract,” Buckeye Boiler Co. v. Superior Court, supra, and (2) whether it “assumed any obligations to [the plaintiff] which he might have sought to enforce in California.” Id.; see United California Bank v. First Bank of Oak Park, 98 Cal.App.3d 439 , 159 Cal.Rptr. 607 (1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2990 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980) (Sibley two part “purposefulness” test applied).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
International Telecommunications Exchange Corp. v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.
See, e.g., Consolidated Freightways Corp. v. Terry Tuck, Inc., 612 F.2d 465, 466 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2990 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Milne Truck Lines, Inc. v. Makita U.S.A., Inc.
Co., 260 U.S. 156, 163 , 43 S.Ct. 47, 49 , 67 L.Ed. 183 (1922)); see also Consolidated Freightways Corp. v. Terry Tuck, Inc., 612 F.2d 465, 466 (9th Cir.) (“[N]o claim for relief can be predicated on a carrier’s alleged fraudulent misquotation of tariffs.”), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2990 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Milne Truck Lines, Inc. v. Makita U.S.A., Inc.
Co., 260 U.S. 156, 163 , 43 S.Ct. 47, 49 , 67 L.Ed. 183 (1922)); see also Consolidated Freightways Corp. v. Terry Tuck, Inc., 612 F.2d 465, 466 (9th Cir.) ("[N]o claim for relief can be predicated on a carrier's alleged fraudulent misquotation of tariffs."), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2990 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of Jason David Meadows
See United States v. Stevens, 510 F.2d 1101, 1104, 1106 (5th Cir.1975) (government attorney’s unsworn, goodfaith affidavit stating that no questions were based on electronic surveillance held adequate response to general and unsubstantiated claim of surveillance); see also In re Grand Jury Proceedings (Brummit), 613 F.2d 62, 65 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2990 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Albert A. Greenwood
What makes a statement material is that it is required to put the claimant in a position to receive government benefits, whether rightfully or wrongfully.” United States v. Adler, 623 F.2d 1287, 1291 (8th Cir.1980); see also United States v. Lichenstein, 610 F.2d 1272, 1278-79 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paulson v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Aero Trucking, Inc., 594 F.2d at 621-22 ; see also Consolidated Freightways v. Terry Tuck, Inc., 612 F.2d 465 , 466 (9th Cir.) (per curiam) (shipper has no claim for relief based on carrier’s fraudulent misquotation of tariffs), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2990 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wicks v. Lockhart
See, e.g., United States v. Lichenstein, 610 F.2d 1272 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Municipal Bond Reporting Antitrust Litigation. John H. Degolyer Company, Inc. v. Standard & Poor's Corporation
See also Blackburn v. Crum & Forster, 611 F.2d 102 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 906 , 100 S.Ct. 2989 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980); Panotex Pipe Line Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 457 F.2d 1279 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 86 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Rutledge Oil Company
See, e.g., Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Delaware v. Terry Tuck, Inc., 612 F.2d 465 (9th Cir.) (dismissing counterclaim for fraud predicated on misquotation of tariffs), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2990 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980); Aero Trucking, Inc. v. Regal Tube Co., 594 F.2d 619 (7th Cir. 1979) (estoppel unavailable for reasonable reliance on fraudulent understatement of charges); Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Delaware v. Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc., 501 F.2d 1400 (7th Cir. 1974) (shipper unwittingly designating more expensive route cannot later assert estoppel defense).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brummitt
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 79-1700.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 9, 1980.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.